The document discusses the principles of taxation and interpretation of tax statutes. It provides 4 key principles of taxation laid down by Adam Smith including that taxes should be proportionate to taxpayer abilities and certain rather than arbitrary. It notes that even enlightened tax systems violate these principles to some degree based on circumstances. The document outlines that tax statutes must be authorized by law and are subject to strict interpretation by courts with any ambiguities resolved in favor of the taxpayer. Strict interpretation means applying the plain meaning of words without inferences around legislative intent. Courts cannot extend tax liability beyond what is clearly written in the statute.
The document discusses the principles of taxation and interpretation of tax statutes. It provides 4 key principles of taxation laid down by Adam Smith including that taxes should be proportionate to taxpayer abilities and certain rather than arbitrary. It notes that even enlightened tax systems violate these principles to some degree based on circumstances. The document outlines that tax statutes must be authorized by law and are subject to strict interpretation by courts with any ambiguities resolved in favor of the taxpayer. Strict interpretation means applying the plain meaning of words without inferences around legislative intent. Courts cannot extend tax liability beyond what is clearly written in the statute.
The document discusses the principles of taxation and interpretation of tax statutes. It provides 4 key principles of taxation laid down by Adam Smith including that taxes should be proportionate to taxpayer abilities and certain rather than arbitrary. It notes that even enlightened tax systems violate these principles to some degree based on circumstances. The document outlines that tax statutes must be authorized by law and are subject to strict interpretation by courts with any ambiguities resolved in favor of the taxpayer. Strict interpretation means applying the plain meaning of words without inferences around legislative intent. Courts cannot extend tax liability beyond what is clearly written in the statute.
The document discusses the principles of taxation and interpretation of tax statutes. It provides 4 key principles of taxation laid down by Adam Smith including that taxes should be proportionate to taxpayer abilities and certain rather than arbitrary. It notes that even enlightened tax systems violate these principles to some degree based on circumstances. The document outlines that tax statutes must be authorized by law and are subject to strict interpretation by courts with any ambiguities resolved in favor of the taxpayer. Strict interpretation means applying the plain meaning of words without inferences around legislative intent. Courts cannot extend tax liability beyond what is clearly written in the statute.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12
Strict Interpretation of Tax
Statutes
By – Raghav Goyal (1927)
Rishabh Chopra(1934) 4 Principles of Taxation
Adam Smith has laid down four principles of
taxation, which have been generally accepted by subsequent political economists. These are : • The subjects of every State ought to contribute to the support of the government as nearly as possible in proportion to their respective abilities. • The tax ought to be certain, not arbitrary. Principles of Taxation
• Every tax ought to be levied at the time or in
the manner most convenient for the contributor. • Every tax ought to be so contrived as both to take out and keep out of the pockets of the people as little as possible over and above what it brings into the public treasury of the State. Principles of Taxation • Even in countries where the most enlightened principles of finance are followed, it will generally be found that all these maxims are violated in some way or the other. • Special circumstances have to be taken into account with regard to every tax that can be proposed, and the policy of imposing one tax instead of another depends upon the balance of advantages and disadvantages, and often to a greater or less extent on considerations of convenience and sentiment. Constitutional Conspectus of Taxation
• Article. 265 provides “No tax shall be levied or collected
except by authority of law.” • Article. 366(28) defines Taxation and Tax reads as: “Taxation include the imposition of any tax or impost whether general or local or special and ‘tax’ shall be construed accordingly.” CCE v. Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills, AIR 2001 SC 3379 It has been held that any compulsory exaction of money by Government amounts to imposition of tax which is not permissible except by or under the authority of a statutory provision. Need and Importance of Interpretation As the social, economic and political conditions of the society keeps on changing, interpretations of the laws also require change. Legislature is not equipped to meet such changing conditions and legislature cannot anticipate every situation which might occurred in real life. Thus, it is Courts which play the role and interpret the laws to adapt as per needs of the society. Rule of Strict Interpretation Strict rule of interpretation is one of the principles used to interpret fiscal and penal statutes. According to this rule, plain, clear and direct meaning is given to words which are used in common parlance by the general public to which such law is applicable. There can be no presumption by court with respect to particular meaning. Court cannot give particular meaning to a word which is not clear by making a presumption that particular meaning is the intention of the legislature. Court cannot under the guise of possible or likely intention of the legislature, give meaning to the words which are not clear and where contextual meaning cannot be made out. Reasons for Applicability of Strict Rule on Taxation Statute • Taxes place a monetary burden on the taxpayer and thus to some extent it is considered as penalty on the taxpayer which is imposed under the authority of law. Thus, unless the imposition of tax is clearly backed by law, no tax can be imposed. • Taxation statute is a fiscal statute which is enacted on the basis of trial and error method or on experimentation basis. It is not practicable for legislature to anticipate all the possible situations or conditions which may arose after the law is enacted. As tax results in pecuniary burden so the benefit of doubt is given to assessee in case of any contradictions. • Strict rule is applicable to taxation statutes, so courts are bound to give clear and plain meaning to the words without delving into the consequences it can result in. There is no presumption of tax or intendment of the legislature to impose tax unless clearly and specifically provided. Thus, it is the legislature or subordinate authority to come forward and bring amendments and clarifications to rectify the loopholes. Strict Rule of Interpretation applicable to Taxation Statute
• Taxation statute is a fiscal statute which imposes the
pecuniary burden on the taxpayer. So such statutes are construed strictly. Plain, clear and direct grammatical meaning is given. Where there are two possible outcomes then that interpretation is given which is in favour of assessee. • Nothing can be inferred to substantiate the intention of the legislature or purpose for which the law was made. Once the revenue shows that particular subject is covered by law then tax is applicable for all those subjects. But if it fails to proof then no tax can be imposed by extending the meaning. • Principal of equity has no role to play in case of taxation law. Thus, whatever is written must be strictly followed without considering its justness. It is duty of the legislature to rectify it through amendments. • In a Taxation statute, if a word has a clear meaning, then in that case, the court is bound to follow the clear meaning even if such meaning results in absurd results. It is in legislature’s domain to rectify such absurdity. In case of taxation statutes, Courts cannot extend the scope of law by giving meanings to word which are unclear or uncertain. • The words used in the taxation law should be given meaning which is understood by general public in daily routine and one which is popular. Such meaning should be given to words which people to whom law is applicable are familiar with. • In case of contradiction whereby two meaning are coming out then one which is reasonable, which will assist in fulfilling the intention of the legislature and solving the purpose for which law was enacted is preferred. They are to be interpreted in such a way so as to enforce and apply charging provisions smoothly. Case Analysis