09 Constitutional Development 1949-56
09 Constitutional Development 1949-56
09 Constitutional Development 1949-56
Development in
Pakistan
1949-1956
Prepared by: ARSHI NAUREEN
Basic Principles Committee
Federalism
Franchise
Basic Principles
Committee
24 Members
Fundamental Rights
Board of Talimat-e-
Islamia
Judiciary
BASIC PRINCIPLES COMMITTEE’S FIRST REPORT
The Committee presented its Report to the Constituent Assembly on 28th September 1950.
1: The Objectives Resolution to be included in the Constitution as the directive principles.
2: Bicameral Legislature: There would be two houses of the parliament.
Upper House: (House of Units) Equal representation for all the five federating units.
Lower House: (House of People) Representation of five federating units on the basis of
Population.
Central Assembly
(Two Houses)
3: PRESIDENT
The Head of State will be elected by joint session of parliament for five years (Two terms only).
President was not answerable to anyone regarding his powers.
Might be a Muslim or non-Muslim.
Assisted by the Prime Minister (PM) and Cabinet.
Parliament may impeach him by 2/3 majority.
He was given the power to abrogate the constitution.
Central Assembly
(Two Houses)
Bicameral
Legislature
Upper House
Lower House
Total seats
Total seats 300
50
175 175
Muhammad Ali Bogra Formula
On October 24, 1954 Malik Ghulam Muhammad surprised everyone and dissolved the
Constituent Assembly which proved a fatal blow to democratic process.
Maulvi Tameez-ud-Din Khan, then Speaker of the Assembly challenged the dissolution
order in Sindh High Court, which decided in the favor of the applicant.
The Federal Government went in appeal in the Federal Court, which accepted the
appeal by set-a siding the order of Sindh High Court.
Earlier in 1954, Prime Minister Mohammad Ali Bogra praised the idea and said, “There will be no
Bengalis, no Punjabis, no Sindhis, no Pathan, no Balochis, no Bahawalpuris, no Khairpuris. The
disappearance of these groups will strengthen the integrity of Pakistan”.
Iskander Mirza who put forward the bill in the Assembly also gave following reasons;
It would end the curse of provincial prejudices.
It would allow the development of backward areas.
It would reduce administrative expenses.
It would make it easier to draw up a new constitution.
It would give East and West Pakistan maximum autonomy.
ONE UNIT
Remote areas of the country were ignored, and some local problems emerged with high intensity.
The people of different provinces of West Pakistan protested against this new scheme and insisted on the separate, distinct identities
of regional cultures of the provinces. The demand for the restoration of small provinces came up through various movements.
In East Pakistan, many political parties and groups questioned the principle of parity between the two wings and perceived that the
whole of West Pakistan is together against East Pakistan. These facts increased the sense of alienation among them.
The ‘One Unit Scheme’ sustained the highly centralized and bureaucratic political order that suffered from a legitimacy crisis in the
NWFP and Sindh. Some leaders of Baluchistan, too, opposed the ‘One Unit Scheme.’
Overall, ‘One Unit’ created more problems internally in West Pakistan, even the disparity between West and the East was neither
removed nor was any other issue was resolved.