The Management of Capital
The Management of Capital
The Management of Capital
Introduction
• What is capital?
▫ Funds contributed by the owners of a financial institution
▫ The long-term funds coming from debt & equity that support a
bank’s long-term assets & absorb its earnings losses.
• Raising and retaining sufficient capital to protect the interests of
customers, employees, owners, and the general public is tough
• Why is capital so important in financial-services management?
▫ It provides a cushion of protection against risk and promotes
public confidence
• Capital has become the centerpiece of supervision and regulation
today
15-3
An international treaty involving the U.S., Canada, Japan & the nations of
Western Europe to impose common capital requirements on all banks in those
countries.
▫ Designed to keep their capital positions strong
▫ Reduce inequalities in capital requirements among different
countries
▫ Promote fair competition
▫ Catch up with recent changes in financial services and financial
innovation
▫ In particular, the expansion of off-balance-sheet commitments
▫ Formally approved in July 1988
▫ Included countries such as:
▫ The United States, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United
Kingdom, and Luxembourg
15-9
Basel 1
Basel II
▫ Bankers found ways around many of Basel I’s restrictions
▫ Instead of making banks less risky, parts of Basel I seemed to encourage banks to
become more risky
▫ Basel I represented a “one size fits all” approach to capital regulation
▫ It failed to recognize that no two banks are alike in terms of their risk profiles
▫ Basel II set up a system in which capital requirements would be more
sensitive to risk and protect against more types of risk than Basel I
▫ Low risk assets would require less capital than high risk assets
▫ Under Basel I, minimum capital requirements remained the same for most
types of loans regardless of credit rating
▫ Under Basel II, minimum capital requirements were designed to vary
significantly with credit quality
Basel Accord Summary
Credit risk was divided into 5 categories: 0%, 10%, 20%, 50%, and 100%
Commercial loans, for example, were assigned to the 100% risk weight category
50% weight attributed to mortgage loans
To calculate required capital, a bank would multiply the assets in each risk category by the
category’s risk weight and then multiply the result by 8%
Thus a $100 commercial loan would be multiplied by 100% and then by 8%, resulting in a
capital requirement of $8
● Basel-I accord was criticized i) for taking a too simplistic approach to setting credit risk weights
and ii) for ignoring other types of risk
● Banks developed techniques to avoid compliance with the capital requirements known as
Capital Arbitrage.
□ If a bank were managing and holding mortgages on houses, it would have to maintain a capital
requirement of 4%. Instead, it sells the mortgages and uses the proceeds to buy US government
bonds, then under the rules, US government bonds produce no capital requirement and the bank
would thus have no capital maintenance. Securitization is the main means used especially by
U.S. banks to engage in regulatory capital arbitrage as it involves reducing the measures of risk.
Basel Accord Summary (cont)
Assume a bank has a portfolio of commercial loans with the following ratings
and internally generated capital requirements
AA-A: 3%-4% capital needed
B+-B: 8% capital needed
B- and below: 12%-16% capital needed
Under Basel-I, the bank has to hold 8% risk-based capital against all of these
loans
To ensure the profitability of the better quality loans, the bank engages in
capital arbitrage--it securitizes the loans so that they are reclassified into a lower
regulatory risk category with a lower capital charge
Lower quality loans with higher internal capital charges are kept on the bank’s
books because they require less risk-based capital than the bank’s internal
model indicates
By the late 1990s, growth in the use of regulatory capital arbitrage led the Basel
Committee to begin work on a new capital regime (Basel-II)
▫ Effort focused on using banks’ internal rating models and internal risk models
▫ Under Basel I, minimum capital requirements remained the same for most types of
loans regardless of credit rating
▫ Under Basel II, minimum capital requirements were designed to vary significantly
with credit quality
15-15
Basel II (contd…)
Problems Accompanying the Implementation of Basel II
▫ Basel II was not perfect
▫ Some forms of risk had no generally accepted measurement scale
▫ Operational Risk
▫ How do we add up the different forms of risk exposure in order to get an
accurate picture of a bank’s total risk exposure?
▫ What should we do about the business cycle?
▫ Most banks are more likely to face risk exposure in the middle of an economic
recession than they will in a period of economic expansion
▫ For example, the Global credit crisis of 2007-2009
▫ Some have expressed concern about improving regulator competence
▫ Basel III: Another Major Regulatory Step Underway, Born in Global Crisis
▫ Key issue in Basel III: Determining the volume and mix of capital the
world’s leading banks should maintain if their troubled assets generate
massive losses
15-16
Pillars of Basel II
─ Internally generated capital avoid floatation costs and doesn’t require to depend on the open market for
funds. Less threaten to existing stockholders with loss of control.
─ Dividend Policy: The board of directors and management must agree on the appropriate retention ratio
and dividend payout ratio
─ Key factor - How fast the financial firm can allow its assets to grow so that its current ratio of capital to
assets is protected from erosion