CFO Macro12 PPT 14
CFO Macro12 PPT 14
CFO Macro12 PPT 14
Twelfth Edition (1 of 2)
PART IV
FURTHER
MACROECONOMICS
ISSUES
Copyright
Copyright2017
© 2017
Pearson
Pearson
Education,
Education,
Inc.Inc. 14-1
Copyright
Chapter 14
Financial Crises,
Stabilization, and
Deficits
THINKING PRACTICALLY
1. Why might it have been hard to predict the boom in the U.S. economy in the last half of
the 1990s?
• Attempts to stabilize the economy can prove destabilizing because of time lags.
• An expansionary policy that should have begun to take effect at point A does not
actually begin to have an impact until point D, when the economy is already on an
upswing.
• Hence, the policy pushes the economy to points E and F (instead of points E
and F).
• Income varies more widely than it would have if no policy had been implemented.
Recognition Lags
• recognition lag The time it takes for policy makers to
recognize the existence of a boom or a slump.
Implementation Lags
• implementation lag The time it takes to put the desired
policy into effect once economists and policy makers
recognize that the economy is in a boom or a slump.
• The GRH legislation, passed in 1986, set out to lower the federal deficit by $36 billion
per year.
• If the plan had worked, a zero deficit would have been achieved by 1991.
• The result is a smaller deficit but a larger decline in income than would
have otherwise occurred.
• implementation lag
• NASDAQ Composite