Review 1 SDT

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 39

E-VTOL Research Internship with NMCAD Lab,

Dept. of Aerospace Engg., IISc.

Structural Design Team


STRUCTURAL DESIGN TEAM
NAME COLLEGE NAME YEAR

Vishal H J RV college of engineering 4th

Vamshi Vardhan reddy RV college of engineering 4th

Shaikh Salman RV college of engineering 4th

Nrupa Chandra G RV college of engineering 4th

Jayasurya M RV college of engineering 4th

Shreesh RD RV college of engineering 4th

Madhu C M RV college of engineering -

Priyanka Prasad BMS college of engineering 4th

Aishwarya M BMS college of engineering 4th

Riya Vasan VIT 4th

Nityashree G RV college of engineering 3rd

Shreyansh RV College of engineering 3rd

Monu kumar RV college of engineering 3rd

Hrishikesh Das RV college of engineering 3rd

Harsh Tiwari Dayanand Sagar College of Engineering 3rd


ERGONOMICS
ERGONOMICS

• Requirements stated
– 4 Passengers + 1 pilot
– No cargo hull/space for initial design
• Passenger cabin > ADT + SDT
• Cockpit > ADT + AvT
PASSENGER CABIN
Seat pitch (cm) Seat width (cm) Aisle width (cm)

Economy Class 71–81 46–51 43–61


Business Class 84–91.5 53–56 56–63.5

Table 1: Seat and aisle pitch and width [1]


Description
Seat width ws
First Class (cm) Coach (cm)
• Headroom taken as 22cm.
48.2 to 53.3 43.1 to 45.7
Armrest width 6.98 6.35 • Additional clearance given for
Aisle width wi 45.7 to 50.8 40.64 to 45.72
Pitch P 94 to 106.7 82.2 to 91.4 wing-box.
Seat height 43.2 43.2
• Pressurization not required for
Table 1: Typical seating P/P0 = 0.8-0.9, unless required
dimensions [2] for AC unit.
COCKPIT (PILOT SEAT DIMENSIONS)
FUTURE WORK

• Decision on materials to be used


• Fuselage load and member calculations
• Location of landing gear
REFERENCES

1. Kundu, A.K., 2010. Aircraft design (Vol. 27). Cambridge University


Press, ISBN: 978-0-511-67785-4.
2. Pascale M. Sforza, “Commercial Airplane Design Principles”, ISBN:
978-0-12- 419953-8 (2014)
COMPOSITES
COMPOSITE MATERIALS
LITERATURE SURVEY
Composite Material Applications

GLARE (GLAss REinforced aluminum) Fuselage skin, Radome internal frame Lower skins of flaps, Leading
edges of stabilizers

Light bulkhead, fuel tanks, and floors


AFRP (Aramid Fibres Reinforced Polymer)

Rotor Blades , Fiberglass Radome


GFRP (Glass Fibres Reinforced Polymer)

Stabilizer skin, Wing Sheathing, leading edge of the vertical tail plane
CFRP (Carbon Fibres Reinforced Polymer)

ARALL (ARamid ALuminum Laminates) Fuselage skin, Lower skin of wing, Fatigued and Tensile loaded
regions

CARALL (CARbon ALuminum Laminates) Fuselage skin, Lower skin of wing, Fatigued and Tensile loaded
regions

Aircraft Interiors
Honeycomb structures (Al alloy core, Fibre sheet covering or fibre
textile covering)

GRE (Glass Reinforced Epoxy) Internal Structures


Table: Composite Material and Applications
Graphite-epoxy composites Internal structures of semi-monocoque
HYBRID MATERIAL CONCEPTS FOR WING AND
EMPENNAGE

● Better the fatigue crack growth


resistance
● Increased fatigue and corrosion
resistance, higher bearing strength
and impact resistance.
● higher fatigue resistance.
● Thick aluminium plate in-between
FMLs
• Propagation of fatigue cracks in
outer aluminium layers are
avoided by adding reinforcement
to the adhesive using high
strength fibres.

• Thick aluminium layers can be


bonded to the straps using fibre
reinforced epoxy resin with a
reduced Fibre Volume Fraction
(FVF).
COMPOSITE MATERIAL - FLOORING PANEL
ALUMINIUM HONEYCOMB CORE AND FRP
COMPOSITE FACE‐SHEETS
● The application of fiber‐reinforced plastic (FRP) composite materials
instead of metals, due to the low density of FRP materials, results in
weight savings in the base plates of aircraft pallets.
● The newly constructed sandwich base plate consists of an
Aluminum honeycomb core and FRP composite face‐sheets.
● The specimens of sandwich panels are made of an aluminum
honeycomb core and orthotropic composite materials face‐sheets.
● The FRP composite face‐sheets are made of Phenolic Woven
Glass Fiber. Phenolic resin is a synthetic polymer.
● The fiber orientation of the composite face‐sheets was cross-ply.
ALUMINIUM HONEYCOMB CORE AND FRP
COMPOSITE FACE‐SHEETS
DIGIMAT HC- INPUTS

Cell Wall thickness- 0.1 mm


Dimensions Cell size- 6 mm

Beam La- 40 mm
Specifications Lb- 670 mm
Lc- 455.875 mm
Beam’s width- 830 mm
Width of the loading panels- 40 mm
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
INFERENCES

• The general thickness of aircraft flooring panel is around 10 mm.

• For different placements of the skin layers:


– The equivalent stresses on the skin changed drastically.
– There is also a change in shear stresses.
FUTURE WORK

● Deciding the composite material for wing, tail, fuselage and


supporting structures.

● Choice of composite material for the construction of control surfaces.


REFERENCES

1. Gunnink, J.W.: US4935291 (1990).


2. A380, world’s largest commercial aircraft, successfully takes to the
skies, Airbus Press Release, 27 April 2005, www.airbus.com.

3. Roebroeks, G.H.J.J., Gunnink, J.W.: WO07145512A1 (2007).


4. On the Development of Hybrid Material Concepts for Aircraft
Structures, Rene Alderliesten, November 20, 2008
WING DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
WING CAD MODEL

● Modelling of wing in solidworks with the given design by the aircraft


design team.(dimensions are in mm)
SETUP OF CFD ANALYSIS

● K-omega SST model


● Fluid - Air
● Inlet Velocity - 100m/s
● Pressure - 101 kpa
● Temperature- 288K
MESHING

● Element size : 566.73mm


● Quality smoothing : High
● Aspect ratio : 1.16
● Inflation
Transition Rate : 0.272
● Max layers :5
● Growth rate : 1.2
● Number of nodes : 281798
Number of element : 1217861
OBTAINED MESH
OBTAINED RESULTS

● Solutions converged at 47th iteration.


● Angle of attack= 0 deg
● CL = 0.921
● CD = 0.1002
TOTAL PRESSURE AND STATIC PRESSURE
CONTOUR

● Static pressure
Max = 6.36e+03Pa
Min = -1.08e+04Pa
● Total Pressure
Max = 5.58e+03Pa
Min = -1.040e+04Pa
VELOCITY CONTOURS

● Given Velocity : 100m/s


● Max velocity : 145m/s
● Min Velocity : 0.556m/s
FORCES IN X,Y AND Z

● Force X :
max = 3.442N
min = -3.298N
● Force Y :
Max = 2.515N
Min = -1.730N
● Force Z :
Max = 41.48N
Min = -28.96N
Future work
• These pressure and load analysis will be used for determining the
load distribution over spars and ribs.
• Forces in X and Y directions will account in shear forces and shear
flow in the cross sections.
REFERENCES

1) Kathiravan.T, Mohammed Huda., Parthiban.K (October ,2018) ,


STRUCTURAL AND MODAL
ANALYSIS OF SUBSONIC AIRCRAFT WING USING ANSYS
WORKBENCH, International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology , 2395,05-10
2)Yunus A. Cengel , Afshin J. Ghajar , Heat And Mass Transfer
Fundamentals & Applications ,
Fifth Edition

You might also like