01 Proactive Negotiation
01 Proactive Negotiation
01 Proactive Negotiation
A Negotiation Example
What follows is a transcript of a radio conversation between a U.S. naval ship and Canadian authorities off the coast of Newfoundland. Canadians: Please divert your course 15 degrees to the south to avoid a collision. Americans: Recommend you divert your course 15 degrees to the north to avoid a collision. Canadians: Negative. You will have to divert your course 15 degrees to the south to avoid a collision. Americans: This is the Captain of a U.S. Navy ship. I say again, divert YOUR course. Canadians: No. I say again, you divert YOUR course. Americans: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER U.S.S. LINCOLN, THE SECOND- LARGEST SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES' ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY THREE DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES NORTH. I SAY AGAIN, THAT'S ONE FIVE DEGREES NORTH, OR COUNTERMEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS SHIP . Canadians: This is a lighthouse. Your call.
What Is Wrong
In Theory
Step I. Problem
Q u a d r a n t C h a r t O v e r v i e w
Conflict can
Be constructive or destructive Be energizing or unnerving Produce higher quality results or stifle a project Lead to original thinking or cause destructive power struggles
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Reduces productivity Destroys morale Spawns additional conflict Polarizes groups Produces regrettable behavior Diverts energy Deepens differences
Negotiation Styles
high
high
Avoiding
high
Useful for: Issues of low importance Reducing tensions Buying time Low power
x
low Interest in seeing the other achieve THEIR goals high
Competing
high
x
Interest in achieving OUR goals
Accommodating
high
Useful for: Creating good will Keeping the peace Retreating Low importance
It would be my pleasure
x
low Interest in seeing the other achieve THEIR goals high
Compromising
high
Useful for: Moderate importance Time constraints Temporary solutions Equal power & strong commitment
high
Collaborating
high
x
Interest in achieving OUR goals
Negotiation Styles
high
Competing
Interest in achieving OUR goals
Collaborating
Compromising
Avoiding
low
Accommodating
high
Positional Haggling
Offer/Position Final Offer Last Offer Last & Final Offer Last & Final Offer Last Offer Final Offer Threat/BATNA Offer/Position
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Threat/BATNA
COMMITMENT
ALTERNATIVE
Interests
Definition Needs, concerns, goals, desires and fears that motivate us to negotiate. Measure Satisfies both parties interests to make durable outcome Note Interests Are Different From Positions Positions are not the only way to meet our interests
Options
Definition Range of possibilities on which the parties might agree. Measure Maximizes creative potential Leaves no joint gains on the table Minimal waste Note Options are different from Alternatives Options are created On the table Separate option generation from option selection
Definition Things we can do, either by ourselves or with a third party, without the other sides agreement. Our BATNA is our Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement. Measure Any outcome should be better than our BATNA Note Alternatives are created Away from the table Develop or improve your BATNA
Legitimacy
Definition The perception of fairness by the parties as determined by outside standards or criteria. Measure Result perceived as fair; no one feels taken. Note Sources of legitimacy include: law, precedent, community standards, expert opinion, industry practices, and market prices. Be open to persuasion
Communication
Definition The medium through which we negotiate. Communication is the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information by speech, signals, writing, physical cues, or other actions. Measure Effective, Efficient and Authentic Message sent = message received Speaker feels heard, and the listener feels involved Note Dont assume we understand or are understood
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Relationship
Definition The quality of interaction between the negotiators. Measure The process we use today improves our ability to negotiate tomorrow. Note Treat every relationship as long term Having a good working relationship does not mean we always agree.
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Commitment
Definition An agreement about what each party will or will not do. Measure Sufficient / Realistic / Operational Aligned with readiness of the parties Note Many possible degrees of commitment Drafts, joint recommendations, agreement in principle, binding contract.
Is better than our Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement, our BATNA Meets both sides Interests Is the best of many Options Is Legitimate, supported by criteria that is objectively fair Improves, supports, or at least does not damage, the Relationship Is based on clear Communication Identifies Commitments that are operational
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Balance inquiry and advocacy Question to understand Separate the people from the problem Encourage two-way communication Be reliable and expect reliability Use persuasion, not coercion Take the time to define the value of collaboration Work together to find a mutually beneficial solution
2003 NCHELP Debt Management Conference
Learning Cycle
CONSCIOUS INCOMPETENCE
CONSCIOUS COMPETENCE
UNCONSCIOUS INCOMPETENCE
UNCONSCIOUS COMPETENCE
Lawrence S. Bacow and Michael Wheeler, Environmental Dispute Resolution, Cambridge: Perseus Books, 1984. J. William Breslin and Jeffrey Z. Rubin, Negotiation Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Program on Negotiation Books, 1995. Herb Cohen, You Can Negotiate Anything, New York: Bantam Books, 1980. Lavina Hall, Negotiation Strategies for Mutual Gain, Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc., 1993. Deborah M. Kolb, Ph. d. And Judith Williams, Ph. d., The Shadow Negotiation, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. Arthur Lall, Modern International Negotiation, New York: Columbia University Press, 1966. David A. Lax, and James K. Sebenius, The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain, New York: Simon & Schuster Trade, 1986. Roy J. Lewicki (Editor), David M. Saunders (Editor) and John W. Minton (Editor), Negotiation: Readings, Cases, and Exercises, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1998.
Bruce Patton, Douglas Stone, Sheila Heen, Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most, New York: Viking, 1999. Howard Raiffa, John S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney, Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, 1999. Jeffrey Z. Rubin and Dean G. Pruitt, Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1993. Jeffrey Z. Rubin and Dean G. Pruitt, Sung Hee Kim, Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, second edition 1994. Eric Rasmusen, Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory, Blackwell Publishers, 1994. Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990. G. Richard Shell, Bargaining for Advantage, New York: Penguin Books, 1999. Timothy J. Sullivan, Resolving Development Disputes through Negotiations, Cambridge: Perseus Books, 1984. William L. Ury, Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation, New York: Bantam Books, 1993. I. William Zartman and Maureen Burman, The Practical Negotiator, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
Provide individuals and groups across the organization with a shared vocabulary and common set of skills and tools to help them negotiate more effectively; Address organization-specific negotiation challenges by using customized role-plays and cases based on participants realworld scenarios ; Focus on particular areas of negotiation effectiveness such as:
dealing with difficult people and tactics building long-term, strategic relationships communicating effectively influencing and persuading others managing differences in perceptions managing roles in multi-party negotiations
Maximize resources by offering local workshops for groups of employees rather than sending them individually to public workshops Decide on a convenient time and location for the workshops which complements the schedule of the employees/organization
In addition, MWIs Negotiation Skills Workshops build each participants capacity to transform adversarial approaches to negotiation into problem-solving collaborations, producing better outcomes for all parties while enhancing long-term working relationships. Each training workshop is designed to:
Stimulate participants awareness of the complexities of negotiation Equip participants with a framework for understanding, diagnosing and leading the negotiation process Enhance participants skills through hands-on experience and feedback Provide participants with a process for continued improvement and learning
Charles Doran Executive Director Mediation Works Incorporated 9 Park Street - Sixth Floor Boston, MA 02108-4807 Phone: 617-973-9739 x22 / 800-348-4888 Fax: 617-973-9532 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.mwi.org/