Psychology Revision: Addictive Behaviour
Psychology Revision: Addictive Behaviour
Psychology Revision: Addictive Behaviour
Addictive Behaviour
Defining addiction
Addiction is often mixed up with excessive enthusiasms.
For example, some people may believe that they are
addicted to something such as tea and feel that they can
not go a day without it. However, in actually fact they
probably could go without it without suffering from
withdrawal symptoms.
• Salience – this is when the addict feels that the behaviour is the most important
thing in life.
• Mood Modification – this is the “buzz” or “high” that addicts report when engaging
in the activity.
• Tolerance – increasing the amount of the activity in order to achieve the same
“high” or “buzz” as when first starting the behaviour.
• Conflict – the individual begins to create conflict with those around them, and
sometimes experience inner conflict due to their own feelings of lack of control.
This idea is present in the activity of gambling. The rational choice theory
would suggest that gambling addicts would not continue their behaviour
after a loss.
A study by Griffiths(1994) offers an explanation for this based on the
cognitive bias/irrational thinking that distorts the reasoning of addictive
gamblers.
Langer (1975) and Langer and Roth(1983) found that when people
overestimate the extent to which they can predict whether they will win or
lose, they tend to lose track of how much money they have won or lost.
Griffiths(1994) states that the amount of control and skill involved in
gambling is overestimated, aiding in the irrational thinking of the
gambling addicts. He also found that addicts tended to explain their losses
as “near wins”, something which justified their continuation.
Explanations to Addiction
Behavioural Approach
Behavioural Approach
The behavioural approach assumes that addictive behaviour is a result of
maladaptive learning through operant or classical conditioning.
Advantages Disadvantages
Reductionist - reduces the act
Offers hope for those who of addiction down to simple
want to quit – they can just reinforcements.
relearn behaviour. Does not explain initiation well.
Is supported by studies. Winefield et al noted that more
gamblers lose than win,
therefore there is little
reinforcement.
It doesn’t take individual
differences into account.
Behavioural Approach
In Classical Conditioning the individual associates a stimulus with a
conditioned response (eg pavlov’s dogs). The conditioned stimulus acts
like a secondary reinforcer.
For example, when a smoker comes closer to something they associate
with smoking, eg smoke/stress, their body may start the biological
process for dealing with the excess dopamine it expects to receive. This
makes the addict feel withdrawal effects and cravings as their body
becomes low in dopamine.
Glutier et al found that alcohol related stimuli often produced the same
physiological responses as the alcohol itself
Siegel et al (1982) argued that tolerance to heroine can be conditioned to
the environment in which the drug is usually consumed. A change in
environment can cause an overdose. This explains the high number of
overdoses in unfamiliar places.
Robsins et al found that veterans who had become addicted to heroine
whilst in Vietnam were much less likely to relapse when they returned
home.
Advantages Disadvantages
Offers hope for those who
Reductionist - reduces the act
want to quit – they can just of addiction down to simple
relearn behaviour. reinforcements.
Is supported by studies.
Behavioural Approach
The social learning theory brings together both classical and operant
conditioning and extends them to looking at observation and
communication.
The addiction starts with operant conditioning where the individual
receives an initial award for the behaviour or witnesses someone else
receive a reward (vicarious reinforcement). Some people witness negative
effects and have a decreased likelihood of becoming addicted.
Through classical conditioning, secondary reinforcers are associated with
the behaviour.
George et al found that the presence of multiple cues raises the “positive
percieved expectations” and therefore increase the motivation to use the
drug again.
Advantages
Explains initiation better than the others.
Takes into account peer group influences.
Takes into account their own expectations.
Vulnerability to Addiction
Intra and Extra
Intrapersonal factors refer to factors that
are due to the individual, whilst extra
personal factors are factors which are
beyond the control of the individual.
However
Hull et al found that there was no diffence in levels of self
esteem of adolescence and substance abuse
Mcmurran found that the most important factors are
culture, family, lifestyle and social group. Feelings and self
esteem were the least important factors.
Attribution theory
This theory relates to the concept of control. Things beyond our
control are called external attributions, we can not be held
responsible for these because we can not control it. Internal
attributions are within our control, allowing us to take blame for
our own actions.
Kelly(1967) asked people why they started smoking. He found
that those with an external locus of control answered with
external attributions, whilst those with internal loci of control
answered with internal attributions.
Sereviratne and Saunders(2000) looked at relapse in alcoholics
and their reasons, and their perceived reasons for other people’s
relapse. They found that alcoholics tended to give external
attributes for themselves, eg “life is so stressful, I had no support
from others” but gave internal attributes for others, such as “they
have a weak personality”. From this it can be concluded that no
one likes to accept blame for their actions so blame addiction on
things beyond our control
Eiser et al found that if smokers perceived themselves as being
“addicted” they felt that it was beyond their control and do not try
to control or stop their addiction. The label “addict” prompted the
self-fulfilling prophecy.
Social Context of Addiction
Godard(1990) found that if parents smoke, the children are much
more likely to smoke.
Murray et al(1984) concluded that a parent’s attitude towards
smoking was very important. If children perceived parents as
being anti-smoking, they were seven times less likely to smoke.
Turner et al(2002) found that gambling addiction could be
associated with ADHD in early life.
Those who come from higher income families are less likely to
become gambling addicts than those who come from low income
families.
Environmental cues may trigger the addiction and cause relapse,
for example, if a smoker is surrounded by ashtrays it may prompt
them to begin smoking again.
Studies into peer pressure and peer groups have shown that
people are more likely to smoke if their friends also smoke.
The role of the media in
addiction
Media enforcement
“Celebrity endorsement” of certain lifestyles is
particularly important in influencing addictive
behaviour amongst young people who are most
vulnerable to the cult of perceived celeb glamour.
Bandura’s social learning theory indicates that
we model our behaviour on someone we respect
or would like to be like. The media offers many
celebrities as models.
The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB)
highlighted the issue that teenagers, in
particular, are very quick to pick up on stories
about a celebrity’s drug habits that go
unpunished. They often respond to the perceived
leniency in dealing with such offenders by
engaging in the activity themselves.
Media enforcement - Negative
Strasburger(1995) found that despite tobacco advertising
being banned in the US in 1971, it remained to be the
most purchased product until the early 1990s. He found
that this was because it was often associated with popular
brands of clothes and sports cars.
Sargent et al(2007) found that being exposed to smoking
through characters in movies and music videos increased
the risk of the observer becoming an established smoker.
Korn and Reynolds(2008) reported the impacts of
commercial gambling advertising as being influential. They
used a sample of adolescents in Canada to do a
questionnaire on gambling advertisements. Every
participant was able to identify atleast one gambling
campaign which they described to be “funny”, “showed
cool people” and indicated possibilities of financial gain. All
of which are likely be attractive to young people.
Media enforcement - Positive
Since the 1950s, the portrayal of smoking on TV has
steadily decreased. Signorielli (1990) reports that US TV
characters were 9 times more likely to smoke in 1964 than
in 1982, and at the same time the incidence of smoking in
society has decreased.
It is determined by:
Subjective norms/ the desirability of behaviour by
culture or social group.
Attitudes towards the outcome or expected outcome.
Theory of Reasoned Action
Beliefs about the
outcome of the
behaviour. Eg, “if
I stop smoking, I
will be healthier” Attitude to
specific
Evaluations of
behaviour
outcome. Eg “I
want to be Behavioural
healthier” intention Behaviour
(intend to quit) (Quitting)
Normative Beliefs
about the behaviour. Eg
“my friends think i should
stop smoking” Subjective
Norms
Motivation to comply
Eg “I want to be liked by
my friends, so I’ll do what
they want”
Theory of Reasoned Action
Advantages Disadvantages
It has been Fails to take past
successfully used in behaviour into account
predicting behaviour even though past
such as blood behaviour is often a
donation and good predictor of
smoking. future behaviour.
It takes personal Doesn’t take irrational
characteristics into or involuntary
account. behaviour into
account.
Not all intention turns
into actual behaviour.
Theory of Planned Behaviour
This theory is about the link between attitudes and
behaviour. It was proposed by Icek Ajzen as an extension
on the theory of reasoned action and is one of the most
predictive persuasion theories.
Subjective
Intention Behaviour
norms
Control
beliefs
Theory of Planned Behaviour
Advantages Disadvantages
It has been Fails to take past
successfully used in behaviour into account
predicting behaviour even though past
such as blood behaviour is often a
donation and good predictor of
smoking. future behaviour.
It takes personal Doesn’t take irrational
characteristics into or involuntary
account. behaviour into
Takes into account account.
the perceptions of the Not all intention turns
individual. into actual behaviour.
Interventions
There are lots of different reasons why people become addicted to
behaviours, therefore no single intervention will work for every
person.
The success of all interventions have been shown to be
dependant on the willingness of the individual to give up.
Prochaska and Diclemente(1983) made a model which details the
stages addicts go through when trying to quit their addiction:
Pre-contemplation (not thinking about quitting)
Contemplation (beginning to think about quitting)
Preparation (thinking practically about quitting, making plans to see
advisors etc.)
Action (actually attempting to quit)
Maintenance (maintaining it)
Aversion therapy (operant conditioning) can also be used to make the addict
associate the behaviour with punishment. Antabuse is a drug taken by alcoholics
which forces them to be sick if they have alcohol. Whilst Lang and Martlatt (1962)
found this to be effective, they noted that it doesn’t address the problems that
started the addiction.
Imaginal Desensitization is where addicts are taught to relax so that when they are
exposed to an environment which triggers the cravings for the behaviour, they can
relax and resist.
Self management techniques are where the addict makes a diary of when they do
the behaviour, therefore they can expect their cravings. Hall et al (1990) found this
to be unsuccessful on its own, but when combined with other therapies it aided in
the reduction of the behaviour.
Evaluations
Advantages Disadvantages
Are successful in helping people Doesn’t address the problems of
quit. why the person began the
Often used together in a multi- addictive behaviour in the first
component programme where place.
other interventions are also used. Aversion therapy poses health
risks.
Aversion therapy is unsuccessful
in non-chemical addictions
because the punishing effect (eg
electric shock) does not last
outside the clinical setting.
Don’t tend to work for gambling
addiction.
Cognitive Interventions
Cognitive psychologists have identified 3 stages of change which are relevant to stopping
smoking with the aid of a therapist:
Contemplation and commitment
Action
Maintenance
Currey (1993) found that many smokers can get through the stages themselves and
successfully quit smoking.
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy involves training the addict in social skills and developing
strategies with them to prevent relapse. It also challenges any ideas they have such as
“I’m not strong enough to give up smoking”, “gambling will get me out of debt”. CBT has
been proven effective, however Feeney(2002) found that it is much more effective when
used in conjunction with drug therapies.
Motivational interviewing involves trying to help addicts find the motivation to quit. This is
done by helping them weigh up the pros and cons of the addiction. Deroo and Rivara
(2001) found it was effective in helping those with substance abuse issues. They also found
that it encourages them to try more intense methods such as drug therapy.
Hypnotherapy, free association and talk therapy are all used to un-cover
issues that the addict is experiencing. These have not been proven
entirely successful through research, but this approach is used in
conjunction with others especially in the case of pathological gambling.
Evaluations
Advantages Disadvantages
Often used together in a multi- Isn’t as successful as drug
component programme where therapies.
other interventions are also used. Isn’t always easy to change
Addresses the reasons that someone’s way of thinking.
people become addicted. There is no evidence relating to
the psychodynamic approach.
Public Health
Doctors are seen as being credible sources of information. Sources have shown
that 70% of smokers will visit the doctors at some point and doctors can be
successful in promoting cessation in smoking.
Russel found that when doctors gave advices to stop smoking, a leaflet on stopping
smoking and a follow up appointment, smokers were more likely to quit.
Worksites have been forced to adopt no smoking policies. This makes it more
inconvenient for smokers.
Ogden found that whilst there was a reduced level of smoking in the workplace, the
smoking outside of work compensated for the less. When he surveyed workers who
smoked, they did see the benefits of not smoking but only 2% actually quit.
The smoking ban for public places has also shown an decrease in the amount of
smokers.
Community based programmes aim to give people motivation and social support.
The swiss national research programme saw a 8% reduction in smoking 3 years
after the campaign started.
In Australia, there was a 15% reduction within 3 years of the start of their
government community quit programmes.