A Man Who Lived in Shell
A Man Who Lived in Shell
A Man Who Lived in Shell
Anton Chekhov
Physician
Anton Pavlovich Chekhov was a Russian physician,
dramaturge and author who is considered to be among the
greatest writers of short stories in history.
Born: January 29, 1860, Taganrog, Russia
Died: July 15, 1904, Badenweiler, Germany
Spouse: Olga Knipper (m. 1901–1904)
Siblings: Maria Chekhova, Nikolai Chekhov,
Alexander Chekhov, Ivan Chekhov, Mikhail Chekhov
Books: Stories of Anton Chekhov, The Lady with the Dog.
PRESENTER
GHULAM MUSTAFA
LAHORE LEADS UNIVERSITY
ANTON PAVLOVICH CHEKHOV
Chekhov popular lines
Medicine is my lawful wife
and
Literature is my mistress
GENRE
SHORT STORY
Original Language
Russian
Translator into English
Ivy Litvinov
characters
Belikov: Teacher of Greek language at
school, forty years old bechelor.
Varya: sister of a new school teacher
Kavalenkov.
Kavalenkov: A new teacher of history at
the school.
How the Story moves ahead?
things.
Chekhov major concerns/ Themes
Humanity must be free from tyranny and coercion, Belikhov
is a social tyrant a mean spirited individual who not only
maintains rigid control over himself but also suppresses the
impulse toward liberation in other.
This story is insidious threat to human freedom and
fulfillment.
Introvert vs. extrovert
Self-restrainment.
Change.
Realism .
Philosophical suicide to avoid sufferings.
Socialable vs. unsocialable.
Atavism : imitate or continue customs of earlier life.
Conclusion
It is a thing of common sense that every one of us
has constructed walls around us, own philosophy and
theory and a self created world in which we dislike to
share with other, we don’t want change in life .
We don’t want the suicide of our philosophy like
Belikov and result is sufferings.
Every one of us living in a shell and does not want to
step out to see light.
Chekhov presents before us a universal theme with
the life history of Belikov, we reject Kavalenkov and
Varya as we don’t want change in our lives as we are
living in our shells.
But the question is there Belikhov is
production of the society, who is responsible
for the construction of such like fragmented
figures?
Or, this is psychological case?
Is Belikov is totally responsible for his action
THANKS