Equity is a branch of the legal system in India that refers to the essence or rules arising from the administration of justice in cases not adequately covered by statute. In India, there was never a separate court for equity, but courts act according to principles of equity and justice in the absence of specific law. The origins of equity in India can be traced back to the Hindu period when jurists introduced equitable principles to meet the needs of the time. Several important Indian statutes have incorporated principles of equity from English law, though not all English equity rules apply in India.
Equity is a branch of the legal system in India that refers to the essence or rules arising from the administration of justice in cases not adequately covered by statute. In India, there was never a separate court for equity, but courts act according to principles of equity and justice in the absence of specific law. The origins of equity in India can be traced back to the Hindu period when jurists introduced equitable principles to meet the needs of the time. Several important Indian statutes have incorporated principles of equity from English law, though not all English equity rules apply in India.
Equity is a branch of the legal system in India that refers to the essence or rules arising from the administration of justice in cases not adequately covered by statute. In India, there was never a separate court for equity, but courts act according to principles of equity and justice in the absence of specific law. The origins of equity in India can be traced back to the Hindu period when jurists introduced equitable principles to meet the needs of the time. Several important Indian statutes have incorporated principles of equity from English law, though not all English equity rules apply in India.
Equity is a branch of the legal system in India that refers to the essence or rules arising from the administration of justice in cases not adequately covered by statute. In India, there was never a separate court for equity, but courts act according to principles of equity and justice in the absence of specific law. The origins of equity in India can be traced back to the Hindu period when jurists introduced equitable principles to meet the needs of the time. Several important Indian statutes have incorporated principles of equity from English law, though not all English equity rules apply in India.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
Equity under Indian Legal System
As a branch of the legal system Equity refers to
the essence or rules arising from the administration process of justice specifically in those cases where the areas are not adequately covered by statute. Equity besides supplements the law with quintessence of liberty and goodwill. In India, as a matter of administration, there was never a well-developed Supreme court as most part of the law for the application of the court is certified. There the court acts according to the principle of equity, justice. In India, there was never any separate court for the administration of equity. The greater part of the law to be applied by the Court, has been codified. But in the absence of specific law or usage in any matter, the court has to act according to principles of ‘Equity’, ‘justice’ and good conscience interpreted to mean only those rules of English Equity which are applicable to Indian society and circumstances. Origin of Equity • In India the origin of equity can be traced back to the Hindu period when jurists explained the old laws and gave new rues of interpretation and equitable solutions in case of conflict between the rules of various laws. Hindu law had never been static and has consequently introduced equitable principles to meet the exigencies of the times. It has been laid down that in case of a conflict between the rules of “Smiritis” either may be followed, as reasoning on the principles of equity. Yuktivichar shall decide the solutions. In Mohammedan law also the principles of equity are clearly noticeable. Abu Hanifa, the founder of the Hanafi sect of Sunnis, expounded the principle that the rule of law based on analogy could be set aside at the option of the judge on a liberal construction or judicial preference to meet the requirements of a particular case. These principles of Mohammedan Law, are known as Istihasan or Juristic Equity. Courts under the East India Company
• Regulation of 1827 required the East India
Company Courts to act according to Justice, equity and good Conscience in the absence of a specific law and usage. Under clause 36 of the Supreme Court Charter of 1823, the Supreme Court of Bombay was expressly made a Court of Equity, and given an equitable jurisdiction corresponding to that of the Court of Chancery. Statutory recognition of Equity
• The SC observed in Official Trustee, W.B v.
Sachindra, AIR 1969 that “in fact in this country we have codified the very principles that were exercised by the Chancery Courts in England under their equitable jurisdiction.” Statutory recognition of the principles of Equity is found in the
1. Specific Relief Act, 1877
2. The Indian Trust Act, 1882 3. Indian Succession Act, 1925 4. Guardian And Wards Act, 1890 5. Indian Contract Act, 1872 6. Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 All these acts were enacted during the British period in India. At the time of codification of law in India, Lord Macaulay spoke in Parliament on codification, and reiterated this simple principle i.e., “uniformity”, when you can have it, “diversity”, when you must have it, but in all cases “Certainty”, and accordingly the Codes and Acts were framed. Conclusion • Thus, we have seen that in enacting many statutes, the Indian Legislature has substantially adopted the English rules of equity, but it must also be noted that all rules of English Equity are not applicable in India. There are many rules of English Equity which have either not been followed in India or imported only in a modified form in view of the special circumstances of this country.