Equity Under Indian Legal System

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Equity under Indian Legal System

As a branch of the legal system Equity refers to


the essence or rules arising from the
administration process of justice specifically in
those cases where the areas are not adequately
covered by statute. Equity besides supplements
the law with quintessence of liberty and goodwill.
In India, as a matter of administration, there was
never a well-developed Supreme court as most
part of the law for the application of the court is
certified. There the court acts according to the
principle of equity, justice.
In India, there was never any separate court
for the administration of equity. The greater
part of the law to be applied by the Court, has
been codified. But in the absence of specific
law or usage in any matter, the court has to
act according to principles of ‘Equity’, ‘justice’
and good conscience interpreted to mean only
those rules of English Equity which are
applicable to Indian society and
circumstances.
Origin of Equity
• In India the origin of equity can be traced back
to the Hindu period when jurists explained the
old laws and gave new rues of interpretation
and equitable solutions in case of conflict
between the rules of various laws. Hindu law
had never been static and has consequently
introduced equitable principles to meet the
exigencies of the times.
It has been laid down that in case of a
conflict between the rules of
“Smiritis” either may be followed, as
reasoning on the principles of equity.
Yuktivichar shall decide the solutions.
In Mohammedan law also the principles of
equity are clearly noticeable. Abu Hanifa, the
founder of the Hanafi sect of Sunnis,
expounded the principle that the rule of law
based on analogy could be set aside at the
option of the judge on a liberal construction
or judicial preference to meet the
requirements of a particular case. These
principles of Mohammedan Law, are known
as Istihasan or Juristic Equity.
Courts under the East India Company

• Regulation of 1827 required the East India


Company Courts to act according to Justice,
equity and good Conscience in the absence of
a specific law and usage. Under clause 36 of
the Supreme Court Charter of 1823, the
Supreme Court of Bombay was expressly
made a Court of Equity, and given an equitable
jurisdiction corresponding to that of the Court
of Chancery.
Statutory recognition of Equity

• The SC observed in Official Trustee, W.B v.


Sachindra, AIR 1969 that “in fact in this
country we have codified the very principles
that were exercised by the Chancery Courts in
England under their equitable jurisdiction.”
Statutory recognition of the principles of
Equity is found in the

1. Specific Relief Act, 1877


2. The Indian Trust Act, 1882
3. Indian Succession Act, 1925
4. Guardian And Wards Act, 1890
5. Indian Contract Act, 1872
6. Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
All these acts were enacted during the
British period in India. At the time of
codification of law in India, Lord Macaulay
spoke in Parliament on codification, and
reiterated this simple principle i.e.,
“uniformity”, when you can have it,
“diversity”, when you must have it, but in
all cases “Certainty”, and accordingly the
Codes and Acts were framed.
Conclusion
• Thus, we have seen that in enacting many
statutes, the Indian Legislature has
substantially adopted the English rules of
equity, but it must also be noted that all rules
of English Equity are not applicable in India.
There are many rules of English Equity which
have either not been followed in India or
imported only in a modified form in view of
the special circumstances of this country.

You might also like