POL 110 Introduction To Political Theory Unit-VI Major Contemporary Issues
POL 110 Introduction To Political Theory Unit-VI Major Contemporary Issues
POL 110 Introduction To Political Theory Unit-VI Major Contemporary Issues
Unit- VI
Major contemporary issues
Today’s Discussion Topic
Types of Democracy
Direct Democracy
Indirect or Representative Democracy
Notions of Democracy
Despite cultural, political and economic differences across different countries, more
and more countries are moving toward more democratic regimes, with higher levels of
civil liberties.
At the same time rising levels of education and standards of living in many parts of the
world have given more and more people higher existential security. Parallel to these
phenomena, the World Values Survey has found that cultures and therefore cultural
values are changing too.
Does economic development cause societies to adopt democratic systems of
government? Are democracies with higher income more likely to survive? These
questions have been asked and answered many times. Yet, they return periodically, as
new generations reignite the old debates with expanded data sets, novel statistical
models, and reframed historical arguments.
Conti…
The idea that economic advances lead to positive changes in political practices can be
traced to the Enlightenment conception of progress, in the works of Turgot, Condorcet,
Adam Smith, and others. Some credit Aristotle with first linking democracy to affluence,
although he associated good government with equality rather than higher income per se.
Later, Marx and Durkheim saw the roots of social and political modernity in the
economic transformations of the Industrial Revolution.
Liberals such as Viscount Bryce (1921, pp. 31–32) attributed the broadening of British
democracy to “the upward economic progress of the middle and humbler classes, which
made it seem unfair to keep them in tutelage.”
Like Marx, the postwar modernization theorists saw the forces that reshaped nineteenth-
century Europe as a syndrome that—they conjectured—would repeat in the decolonizing
countries of Asia and Africa.
Conti…
There, too, industrialization, urbanization, occupational specialization, social
differentiation, broader education, and consequent cultural changes would undermine
traditional power structures.
Unlike Marx, they envisioned as the endpoint not communist utopia but popular
government. Their belief in a universal logic was criticized by some as ethnocentric and
insensitive to the ways that global capitalism limited development in the periphery. But
were the modernization theorists right?
A first wave of challenges focused on exceptions. Germany and Japan industrialized but
did not immediately become stable democracies.
The Soviet Union and its East European satellites remained communist, even as their
scientists probed space and pioneered missile technology.
In the 1970s, military juntas took over the most economically advanced countries of Latin
America. These cases motivated theories of alternative, illiberal paths to modernity (
Moore 1966, O'Donnell 1988).
Conti….
What is most interesting now about these counterexamples is that none lasted.
Germany, Japan, Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay have been democratic for decades.
The Soviet Union collapsed, yielding 15 new countries and liberating its East
European allies. Almost all are more democratic today than 30 years ago. Fascist
and bureaucratic-authoritarian regimes have proved both rare and temporary
deviations from a common path rather than pioneers of alternative ones.
The third wave of democratisation which occurred in the late 20th Century
revolutionised different political systems across Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and
Latin America.
It is clear that in the 21st century, the majority of countries have follow the principle
of liberal democracy. The changing dynamic of democracy to liberal democracy is
increasing the economic development of the majority of countries.
Conclusion
So why does democracy increase growth? Our strategy is not well-suited to
disentangling particular mechanisms, but we attempt to disaggregate both
dimensions of democracy and proximate determinants of growth. When we
disentangle what components of democracy matter the most for growth, we find that
civil liberties are what seem to be the most important. We also find positive effects
of democracy on economic reforms, private investment, the size and capacity of
government, and a reduction in social conflict. Clearly all of these are channels by
which democracy can increase economic growth.
Thank You