Sahara Vs Sebi Dispute Case
Sahara Vs Sebi Dispute Case
Sahara Vs Sebi Dispute Case
Functions of SEBI
1. Issuers:
For issuers it provides a market place in which they can raise finance fairly and
easily.
2. Investors:
For investors it provides protection and supply of accurate and correct
information.
3. Intermediaries:
For intermediaries it provides a competitive professional market.
Objectives of SEBI:
SEBI has a power to initiate actions in regard to functions assigned. For example, it
can issue guidelines to different intermediaries or can introduce specific rules for
the protection of interests of investors.
CONTINUE…
SEBI has power to regulate insider trading or can regulate the functions of merchant bankers.
• Powers under Securities Contracts Act:
For effective regulation of stock exchange, the Ministry of Finance issued a Notification on 13
September, 1994 delegating several of its powers under the Securities Contracts (Regulations)
Act to SEBI.
SEBI is also empowered by the Finance Ministry to nominate three members on the Governing
Body of every stock exchange.
• Power to regulate business of stock exchanges:
SEBI is also empowered to regulate the business of stock exchanges, intermediaries associated
with the securities market as well as mutual funds, fraudulent and unfair trade practices
relating to securities and regulation of acquisition of shares and takeovers of companies.
INTRODUCTION : SAHARA
• Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd (SIRECL) & Sahara Housing Investment
Corporation Ltd (SHICL) issued Optionally fully convertible debentures (OFCDs)
through subscriptions from investors w.e from 25th April 2008 upto 13th April 2011
• Raised around Rs. 20,000 cr from investors
• However amount was collected from about 30 million investors in the guise of
“Private Placement”
• SEBI passed an order stating the two companies to refund the money Rs. 17,400 Cr
within 3 months with 15% interest
• Sahara filed an Appealed before Securities Appellate Tribunal
SEBI PERFORM IN SAHARA
• SEBI deemed the fund-raising illegal, to which Sahara responded with full-page
advertisements in newspapers.
• Sebi’s whole time director Prashant Saran orders Subrata Roy and three
other directors of the Sahara group to appear before him at 3pm on April
10 and submit a list of all their assets and copies of their income and
wealth tax returns from financial year 2007-08
• June 2011 - SEBI ordered Sahara firms to immediately refund the
money collected through sales of OFCDs.
• June 2012 - SEBI informed Supreme Court that real estate division
of Sahara india pariwar had no right to mobilize Rs.27,000 crore
from investors through optionally fully convertible debentures
(OFCD) without complying norms of Market regulator - SEBI
• Sahara India Real Estate Corp voices its grievance over a news channel reporting its
proposal made to the Securities and Exchange Board of India on securing the money
it mopped up from the market.
• The Supreme Court tells market regulator SEBI that it was free to initiate action
against two real estate companies of the Sahara group if they fail to take steps for
the refund of investors' money as directed by the apex court
• Sebi files a contempt petition against Sahara claiming it had not furnished the
investor documents within the court stipulated time. The Sahara group in
response moved the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) in protest against
market regulator Sebi's refusal to extend the deadline for the submission of
documents relating to the bond flotations by two unlisted group firms.
• Sahara Group moves the Supreme Court after
SAT rejects its appeal against SEBI.
• The Supreme Court tells market regulator Sebi that it was free to freeze accounts
and seize properties of Sahara group's two companies for defying court orders by
not refunding Rs. 24,000 crore to investors.
• Market regulator Securities Exchange Board of India also cautioned investors and
the general public against dealing with two Sahara group companies -- Sahara India
Real Estate Corp and Sahara Housing Investment Corp -- and their promoters
• Sebi files a contempt petition against Sahara in SC. Says company flouting SC
direction to make refund.
• The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) urges the Supreme Court to
award maximum punishment to Sahara India's head Subrata Roy.
• The Supreme Court directs the Sahara Group to give original title deeds of its
assets worth Rs.20,000 crore to SEBI as a guarantee towards the payment of
investors money.
OVERVIEW OF CASE
• The Supreme Court on 31st August, 2012 in one of its most anticipated judgment of
recent times has directed the Sahara Group.
• Sahara Group and its two group companies Sahara India Real Estate Corporation
Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL)
• To refund around Rs 17,400 crore to their investors within 3 months from the date
of the order with an interest of 15%.
• The Supreme Court while confirming the findings of the SAT has further asked
SEBI to probe into the matter and find out the actual investor base who have
subscribed to the Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs) issued by the
two group companies SIRECL and SHICL.
BACKGROUND OF CASE