Ethics: For College Students
Ethics: For College Students
Ethics: For College Students
FOR COLLEGE
-REV. FR. ANTHONY
STUDENTS
GEORGE BERGONIO
CHAPTER 2
FREEDOM
AND MORALITY
LESSON 1
FREEDOM
AND MORAL ACTS
FREEDOM AND MORAL ACTS
• In Kant Philosophy, freedom is defined as a concept
which is involved in the moral domain, at the question:
what should I do?
• Kant says that the moral law is only that I know
myself as a free person. Kantian freedom is
closely linked to the notion of autonomy, which
means law itself: thus, freedom falls obedience
to a law that I created myself. It is therefore,
respect its commitment to compliance with
oneself.
FREEDOM AND MORAL ACTS
• Practical reasons legislates (make laws and
requirements) of free being, or more precisely
the causality of free beings. Thus, practical
reason is based on freedom, it is freedom.
• Kant Ethics is mainly based on the concepts of
free will and autonomy.
KANTS MORALITY AND FREEDOM
• To act freely is to act autonomously. To act
autonomously is to act according to a law I give
myself.
• Whenever I act according to the laws of nature,
demands of social convention, when I pursue
pleasure and comfort, I am not acting freely. To
act freely is to choose the end itself, for its own
sake.
• For Kant, acting freely (autonomously) and acting
morally are one and the same thing.
To arrive at a proper understanding of
Kant’s notion of moral law and the
connection between morality, freedom
and reason, let’s examine these
contrasts:
DUTY VS INCLINATION (MORALITY)
- only the motive of duty, acting
according the law I gave myself
confers moral worth to an action. Any
other motive, while possibly
commendable, cannot give an action
moral worth.
AUTONOMY VS HETERONOMY (FREEDOM)
-I am only free when my will is determined
autonomously, governed by the law I give myself.
Being part of nature, I am not exempt from its laws
and I’m inclined or compelled to act according to
those laws (act heteronomously). My capacity for
reason opens another possibility. That of acting
according to the laws other than the laws of nature: the
laws I give myself. this reason, “pure practical
reason”, legislatives a priori -regardless of all
empirical ends.
CATEGORICAL VS HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVES (REASON)
– Kant acknowledges two ways in which reason
can command the will, two imperatives.
Hypothetical Imperatives uses instrumental
reason: if I want X, I must do Y. (If I want to stay
out of jail, I must be a good citizen and not rob
banks). Hypothetical imperatives is always
conditional.
TWO MAIN
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:
FORMULATIONS OF
Act only on that maxim whereby you can
at the same time will that it should
become a universal law.
-Immanuel Kant
•“MAXIM” is a rule, a principle that gives
reason to action.
•This is a “UNIVERSALIZING TEST” that checks
whether my action puts my interests and
circumstances ahead of everyone else’s. My
action will fail the test if it results in a
contradiction.
“Act in such a way that you always treat
humanity, whether in your own person or in the
person of any other, never simply as a means,
but always at the same time as an end.
-Immanuel Kant
•For Kant, HUMAN EXISTENCE has in
itself an absolute value -it is an end
in itself and the only ground of
possible categorical imperative.
THE ROLE OF
FREEDOM IN
MORALITY
• The Personal Aspect of Morality -which might
more properly be called ethics – is about the
cultivation of virtue: The development of
character traits so that choosing the good
becomes a matter of habit.
• Virtue can be guided by cultural traditions and
social institutions, but it cannot be coerced. A
virtuous man must also be a free man.
The interpersonal aspect of
morality is more about rule
following. RULES prevent us
from colliding with each
other. They permit us to live
together in harmony, and
they also make us recognize
from the mere consequences
to ourselves, the rights of
others.
FREEDOM: THE FOUNDATION OF
MORAL ACT
• Freedom is human’s greatest quality and it is
a reflection of our creator.
• Freedom is the power rooted in reason and
will, to act or not to act, to do this or that
and so to perform deliberate actions on one’s
own responsibility. Having Freedom means
having Responsibility.
WHAT SEPARATES HUMAN FROM
ANIMALS?
• REASON (intellect) and WILL (moral action).
• GOOD AND EVIL are rooted are forged in freedom. To that
degree that a person reaches higher level of freedom, he
becomes capable of higher levels of morality. The sinful
person becomes slave.
• The existence of freedom is a central premise in Catholic
morality. Our secular culture greatly exalts freedom. Yet
it also questions whether freedom really exists.
FREEDOM AND FREE WILL.
• There are many possible limits to our freedom: both
external and internal.
• EXTERNAL FREEDOM is a freedom from factors
outside ourselves that limit or destroy our free will.
• INTERNAL FREEDOM is a freedom from interior
factors that limit our free will.
Requirement of True Freedom
• True freedom is dependent upon truth, “You will
know the truth, and the truth will set you free (JN
8:32). True freedom is oriented toward the good.
• Evil enslaves us and diminishes our ability to be free.
• True freedom requires responsibility. There is no
such things as irresponsible freedom
Human act vs Acts of Humans.
• Human acts make use of his knowledge
and free will. Ex. Love your enemy, pray to
God, sacrifice for others.
• Acts of Human do not make use of his
intellect or will knowledge. His action is
natural. Ex. Breathing, blinking, and
sneezing.
• Man is created by God as a human person who can
begin and control his own actions. He is meant to seek
God and gain perfection by clinging to him. By
freedom (rooted form his intellect and will) man has
the power to act or not to act.
• By constantly doing good, man grows in freedom.
Doing evil leads man into a “slavery of sin” (Rom 6:17).
A person is responsible for directly willed
act. God confronted Eve, “What is this
that you have done?” (Gen 3:13). He also
confronted Cain, “what have you done?”
(Gen 4:10). A person is not responsible
for an evil act if he did not will it and did
not intend it as a means to an end.
• Human history attests that the problems of man come
from man’s abuse of freedom.
• An act is good when the object, the intention, and the
circumstances are all good. Some acts are evil in
themselves as fornication and are always wrong to
choose.
• Therefore, the person’s intention and circumstances, such
as pressure or duress, cannot change a morally evil act,
such as murder, blasphemy, or adultery, into a morally
good act. We cannot do evil so good will come from it.
LESSON 2
Culture and Morality
WHAT IS CULTURE?
• Culture is derived from the Latin Word “cultura” or “cultus”
which means care or cultivation. Culture as cultivation implies
that every human being is a potential member of his own social
group.
• He is endowed with certain innate qualities to make use.
However, he cannot develop these inborn talents without the
other people. He needs other people who can provide him with
the needed opportunities so he can translate these potentialities
into realities called achievement.
• “Culture is that complex whole which includes
knowledge, belief, law art, moral, custom, and other
capabilities and habits acquired as a member of
society” (Anthropologist Edward B. Taylor).
• On the other hand, sociologists defined culture as the
entire way of life followed by people, and everything
learned and shared by people in society. Culture is a
complex set of learned and shared beliefs, customs
skills, habits, traditions, and knowledge common to
members of society.
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE IN MORAL
DEVELOPMENT
• Culture has been with us since the dawn of human existence.
Significant as it is, culture considerably shapes its members on
how they live and relate within themselves and with other
cultures.
• Culture is a social environment in which a person is born and
wherein he or she lives together with other persons.
• Hence, culture has a great impact in the development of the
human person in varied ways; may it be in physical, knowledge,
thought, relationship, religious or moral development.
• Culture is a person’s heritage that has been passed
from one generation to the next basically through the
relationship that binds the society together.
• Culture is rooted form the “collective human
experience”. Culture is always transmitted, shared or
acquired through learning.
How culture influences the moral development of the people.