Different Types of Tooth Preparation
Different Types of Tooth Preparation
Different Types of Tooth Preparation
Sahana.R
PG – II yr
CONTENTS
• Definition
• Classification
• Conclusion
• References
DEFINITION (GPT – 9)
• Despite these advances, traditional crowns are still indicated for majority of
patients. The classic design of the preparation must be visualized so that
modifications if required can be instituted. Diagnosis and disciplined tooth
preparation are essential to successful fixed prosthetics.
PRINCIPLES OF TOOTH PREPARATION
(According to Rosenstiel)
BIOLOGIC
Conservation of tooth
structure
Avoidance of over contouring
Supra gingival margins
Harmonious occlusion
Protection against tooth
fracture
ESTHETIC OPTIMAL
MECHANICAL RESTORATION
Minimum display of metal
Maximum thickness of
Retention form
porcelain
Resistance form Porcelain occlusal surfaces
Subgingival margins
(According to Shillingburg)
RETAINERS
• Used where the break down of tooth structure is severe to the extent that
has been described as “the final attempt to preserve the tooth”
• Strong
• Wide round tipped tapered diamond (fine grit) (1.2 mm)- For finishing
STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE
• Half occlusal surface is reduced first and other half can be maintained as
reference
• Place 3 alignment groove on each buccal and lingual wall with narrow
round end tapered diamond.
• Diamond bur with 6 degree taper is used and identical axial taper will
result in preparation.
• The remaining islands of tooth structure between alignment grooves are
removed while the chamfer margin is placed.
• Ceramic layer bonded to a thin cast metal coping that fits over the tooth
preparation
• Esthetic demands
• Correction of malocclusion.
• Strength
• Good retention
ARMAMANTARIUM
• Round tipped rotary diamonds (regular grit for buccal reduction, fine grit
for finishing)
• Finishing stones
Guiding grooves:-
• Place in 2 planes- the cervical portion is parallel to long axis of tooth, for
incisal (occlusal) follows normal facial contour.
• 1.2 mm deep
Incisal (occlusal)reduction:
Lingual reduction:-
Finishing :-
• Excellent aesthetic
Facial reduction:-
• Bur- tapered diamond
Incisal reduction :-
• Bur – tapered diamond
Finishing :-
• Bur – fine grit diamond or carbide
• Three quarter crown – covers three surfaces of the crown leaving one
surface intact.
• Teeth with normal anatomic crown form, ie, without cervical constriction.
•
• Anterior teeth with adequate labio-lingual thickness
ADVANTAGE
• Tapered and straight carbide fissure burs - preparation of boxes, ledges and
pinhole finalisation.
• Finishing stones
Incisal Reduction:
• Using tapered round ended diamond bur reduce the incisal edge 1mm at
45 degree to the long axis of tooth.
• Follow the facial contour of the tooth and uniformly remove 1 – 1.5mm of
enamel
• Design of incisal bevel should prevent contact with opposing teeth and
incisal margin
Lingual Reduction:
Accomplished in two stages:
• Slight ridge left running incisogingivally along the centre of the lingual
surface.
• Reduction parallels long axis of the preparation (in this case the incisal two
thirds of the labial surface)
1) Using a 169L carbide bur, reduce the proximal surface by moving bur
from lingual to the facial surface. Position bur so that the tip of the bur is
further facial than the shank. Do not break contact with the adjacent
teeth. The facial line angles must remain intacet to provide aesthetically
pleasing results
• These are placed as far labially as possible without undermining the labial
enamel plate
• First groove is begun by cutting a 1mm deep template with a 170L bur.
This groove is extended gingivally in increments to the full length.
• Lingual wall of the groove has a 2 – 5 degree incisal convergence with the
lingual gingival wall of the preparation.
• Facial wall of the groove should be continuous with the proximal flare to
contribute bulk to the facial margin.
• The grooves are parallel to the incisal half or two thirds of facial surface.
• Boxes may be used as substitutes for the grooves where there are existing
proximal restorations or caries. Boxes must be narrow to resistant, hence
lingual wall of the box shortens as it moves lingually.
• The grooves are a minimum of 3mm long and terminate within 0.5mm of
the gingival finish line.
Incisal groove :
• Using 37 inverted cone bur, develop a 0.5 to 1mm groove connecting the
proximal groove . This should be in the dentin and parallel to the DEJ.
Facial bevel:
• Using a fine, flame shaped diamond bur, develop a narrow bevel < 0.5mm
on the labioincisal finish line at right angles to incisal two thirds of the
facial surface.
• Finishing the preparation Using a carbide finishing bur, round the angles
to ensure continuity of all the finish lines
RESIN BONDED BRIDGE
PREPARATION FOR RESIN BONDED BRIDGES
• The tooth preparation includes axial reduction and guide planes on the
proximal surfaces with a slight extension onto the facial surface to achieve a
faciolingual lock.
• To minimize any
deleterious effect on the
periodontium, the very
light chamfer finish line
should remain
approximately 1.0 mm
supragingival throughout
its length.
• Short groove is placed at
the facialmost extension of
the reduction on the
opposite side of the
cingulum with a short
needle diamond.
• It is critical to refrain from "jumping ahead" before the previous step has
been evaluated and, if necessary, corrected.
• If the clinician proceeds too rapidly, precious chair time will be lost, and
the quality of the preparation will probably suffer.
REFERENCE
• Goodacre CJ, Compagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete
crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2011
Apr;85(4):363-76.
• Parker MH, Calverley MJ, Gardner FM, Gunderson RB. New guidelines for
preparation taper. J Prosthodont. 1993;2:61-6.
• Farah JW, Craig RG, Payton FA. Experimental stress analysis of a restored
axisymmetric first molar. J Dent Res. 1974;53:859-866.
• Maxwell AW, Blank LW, Pelleu GB Jr. Effect of crown preparation height on
the retention and resistance of gold castings. Gen Dent. 1990;38:200-2.
• Woolsey GD, Matich JA. The effect of axial grooves on the resistance form
of cast restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;97:978-80.