Rishabh Malhotra ERP - 0191MBA041 Jatin Soni ERP - 0191MBA028

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Presented Presented

By By

JATIN SONI RISHABH


ERP – 0191MBA028 MALHOTRA
ERP – 0191MBA041

SUBMITTED TO –
Mr. NAVNEET GERA
WHAT IS GAME THEORY?

 In some respects, game theory is the science of strategy, or at least the optimal
decision-making of independent and competing actors in a strategic setting.
 Game theory is a theoretical framework for conceiving social situations among
competing players.
 The key pioneers of game theory were mathematicians John von Neumann
and John Nash, as well as economist Oskar Morgenstern.
THE BASICS OF GAME THEORY
 The focus of game theory is the game, which serves as a model of an interactive
situation among rational players. 
 The key to game theory is that one player's payoff is contingent on the strategy
implemented by the other player. 
 The game identifies the players' identities, preferences, and available strategies
and how these strategies affect the outcome.
 Game theory has a wide range of applications, including psychology, war,
politics, economics, and business.
 Despite its many advances, game theory is still a young and developing science.
GAME THEORY JARGONS
 Game: Any set of circumstances that has a result dependent on the actions of two or
more decision-makers (players)
 Players: A strategic decision-maker within the context of the game
 Strategy: A complete plan of action a player will take given the set of circumstances
that might arise within the game
 Payoff: The payout a player receives from arriving at a particular outcome (The
payout can be in any quantifiable form, from dollars to utility.)
 Information set: The information available at a given point in the game (The
term information set is most usually applied when the game has a sequential
component.)
 Equilibrium: The point in a game where both players have made their decisions and
an outcome is reached
Boeing-Airbus game
 Boeing and Airbus have to decide whether to invest in the development of a
Super Jumbo for long distance travel;
 if they both develop successfully the new plane, their profits will drop by 50
millions a year;
 if only one develop the Super Jumbo, it will make 80 millions a year in
additional profits, whereas the profits of the other firm will drop by 30 millions
a year;
 if no firm develops the plane, nothing changes.
Matrix Representation of Boeing-Airbus game

Airbus

Do not
Develop
develop

Develop -50,-50 80,-30


Boeing
Do not
-30,80 0,0
develop
Prisoners’ Dilemma

 Two individuals have been arrested for possession of guns. The police
suspects that they have committed 10 bank robberies;
 if nobody confesses the police, they will be jailed for 2 years.
 if only one confesses, he’ll go free and her partner will be jailed for 40
years.
 if they both confess, they get 16 years
Matrix Representation of Prisoners Dilemma

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
We want to predict the outcome of the game

Suppose that Rishabh decides to confess. What is the best decision for Jatin?

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
We want to predict the outcome of the game

Suppose that Rishabh decides to remain silent. What is the best decision for Jatin?

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
We want to predict the outcome of the game
Suppose that Jatin decides to confess. What is the best decision for Rishabh?

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
We want to predict the outcome of the game
Suppose that Jatin decides to remain silent. What is the best decision for Rishabh?

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
Outcome of the Game

Jatin

Do not
Confess
Confess

Confess 16,16 0,40


Rishabh
Do not
40,0 2,2
Confess
NASH EQUILIBRIUM

 Nash Equilibrium is an outcome reached that, once achieved, means no player can
increase payoff by changing decisions unilaterally. It can also be thought of as "no
regrets," in the sense that once a decision is made, the player will have no regrets
concerning decisions considering the consequences.
 The decisions of the players are a Nash Equilibrium if no individual prefers a
different choice.
 In other words, each player is choosing the best strategy, given the strategies
chosen by the other players.
Cooperative & Non-Cooperative
 Cooperative games are the one in which players are convinced to adopt a
particular strategy through negotiations and agreements between players. Let us
take the example cited in prisoner’s dilemma to understand the concept of
cooperative games. In case, John and Mac had been able to contact each other,
then they must have decided to remain silent. Therefore, their negotiation would
have helped in solving out the problem.
 Non-cooperative games refer to the games in which the players decide on their
own strategy to maximize their profit. The best example of a non-cooperative
game is prisoner’s dilemma. Non-cooperative games provide accurate results.
This is because in non-cooperative games, a very deep analysis of a problem takes
place.
Constant Sum, Zero Sum & Non Zero
Sum
 Constant sum game is the one in which the sum of outcome of all the players
remains constant even if the outcomes are different. Zero sum game is a type of
constant sum game in which the sum of outcomes of all players is zero. In zero
sum game, the strategies of different players cannot affect the available resources.
 Moreover, in zero sum game, the gain of one player is always equal to the loss of
the other player. On the other hand, non-zero sum game are the games in which
sum of the outcomes of all the players is not zero.
 A non-zero sum game can be transformed to zero sum game by adding one
dummy player. The losses of dummy player are overridden by the net earnings of
players.
 Examples of zero sum games are chess and gambling. In these games, the gain of
one player results in the loss of the other player. However, cooperative games are
the example of non-zero games. This is because in cooperative games, either
every player wins or loses.
THANK YOU !

You might also like