Disaster Management For Social & Economic Development: Midlands State University
Disaster Management For Social & Economic Development: Midlands State University
Disaster Management For Social & Economic Development: Midlands State University
UNIVERSITY
BEFORE
Prevention
Mitigation
Preparedness
DURING
Response
AFTER
Recovery
PREVENTION
This refers to the best ways to address a disaster before it occurs
It is there to ensure that human action or natural phenomena do not
result in disaster or emergency
PRO ACTIVENESS
This identifies potential hazards and devising safeguard to mitigate
their impact
It involves putting into place permanent measure that can help
minimize disaster risk
MITIGATION
This means to reduce severity of the human & material damage caused
by the disaster.
Mitigation aims to minimize the loss of human life that would result
from a disaster , both structural & non structural measures may be taken.
A structural measure means changing the physical characteristics of a
building of an environment to curb the effects of a disaster e.g. clearing
trees away from residential areas to ensure that dangerous storm don’t
knock down the trees and them crashing into homes and public
buildings.
PREPAREDNESS
It as an ongoing process in which individuals, communities,
businesses and organizations can plan and train for what they
will do in the event of a disaster
It can also be defined by ongoing training , evaluation &
corrective action ensuring the highest level of readiness
Fire drills , active-shooter drills & evacuation rehearsals are all
good examples of the preparedness stage
RESPONSE
This is what happens after the disaster occurs.
It involves both short and long-term responses.
Ideally, the disaster-management leader will coordinate the use of resources
including personnel, supplies & equipment to help restore personal &
environmental safety as well as to minimize the risk of any additional damage
RECOVERY
This is the last stage of disaster management, it can be sudden or long-term e.g.
New Orleans have yet to fully recover from hurricane Katrina , in the
Zimbabwean highlands in Chimanimani still has not recovered from the tragic
effects of cyclone idai.
It involves stabilizing the area and restoring all essential community functions.
Recovery requires prioritization, essential services like food, clean water,
utilities, transportation & healthcare will be restored
EFFECTIVENESS
CASE STUDY OF A SCENERIO OF A DISASTER MANAGEMENT THAT
WAS A FAILURE
In Zimbabwe , the past 2 decades have been punctuated by series of cyclones
which have left serious impact on the entire socio-economic system .
These events can be chronicled from the 2000 cyclone Eline that caused 91
deaths, 356 injuries & destroyed 54 187 houses & resulted about 2.7 million
people being affected (Brown et Al)2012
This was followed by cyclone Japhet in 2003, Dineo in 2017 & cyclone Idai in
2019.
CYCLONE IDAI
Cyclone Idai hit the country on 15 march 2019.
Rusitu valley in Chimanimani is one of the low lying areas were cyclone Idai left a traumatic
experience its communities.
The locals are said to have utilized a collection of their local networks, values, resources & ingenuity
in response to the disaster.
Most parts were cut from the rest of the country for several days as roads and bridges were damaged &
communication systems were disrupted.
The state disaster management officials & other external support only managed to access Rusitu valley
on 20 March 2019.
EFFECTS OF CYCLONE IDAI
Loss of lives
Damage of property
Death of livestock
Destruction of infrastructure & environment
Damage of crops
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MEASURES
TAKEN TOWARDS CYCLONE IDAI
The steps taken were effective to a lesser extent as a result of the following factors:
Poor early warning systems
Ignorance to early warning systems
Late rescue & search operation
Unavailability of camps for displaced person(s)
However the last stage of the emergency preparedness i.e. recovery towards the disaster is was met and
is currently on going .
Food aids through donations
Reconstruction of damaged infrastructure e.g. roads, bridges
Disaster management officials working towards rectifying the failures in the first 4 steps to reduce
effect in the future as the area has been identified to be prone of such emergencies
DISASTER AWARENESS
Evacuation
Conducting life saving missions e.g. rescue teams
Reinforcement
Designating facilities for emergency use
Reducing stress related illnesses
DISASTER IMPACTS
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
Positive
Formation of minerals
Improved soil fertility
Employment creation
NEGATIVE
Infrastructure destruction
Deterioration of buildings
Destruction of tourist sites
Death of a working member
Low gross domestic product particularly cotton production
SOCIAL IMPACTS
Negative
Loss of lives
Health problems
They be orphans
Increase in number of widows
Evacuation into new areas leads to language barriers
Cultural dilution
Destruction of crops
Pressure on health facilities
Death of livestock
SENDAI FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT FOR
DISASTER REDUCTION 2015-2030
DEFINATION OF KEY TERMS
Disaster – severe disruption of a certain area which involves economic ,
social & environmental loses
Risk – probability of a disaster to occur
Disaster risk reduction- according to the United Nations office for disaster
risk reduction 2015 , it refers to the target to reduce damage caused by natural
disasters
Framework- a set of ideas which are put aside in order to deal with problems
Sendai framework- a set of 7 targets adopted to reduce the occurrence of
disasters
BACKGROUND OF SENDAI
FRAMEWORK
The sendai framework succeeded the hyogo framework for action.
According to Olowu(2010) the Hyogo framework was adapted at the world conference by
168 governments on disaster reduction in Hyogo , Japan in January 2005.
Its main focus was to identify vulnerable areas to disasters & find possible solutions.
The sendai framework was adopted at the 3rd United Nations world conference on disaster
risk reduction in Sendai Miyati, Japan from14-18 March 2015
The framework applies to the risk of both small & large scale, infrequent sudden & slow
onset disasters caused by natural or man-made hazards.
Its objective is to guide the multi-hazard management of disaster risk in development at all
levels as well as across all sectors.
It centers around 7 targets that were adopted and its is key to achievement of the sustainable
development goals.
It also has 4 priorities for action
4 PRIORITIES
Understanding disaster risk
Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk
Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience .
Enhancing disaster preparedness.
SEVEN GLOBAL TARGETS
Reduce global disaster mortality
Reduce the number of affected people globally
Reduce direct economic loss in relation to GDP
Reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure disruption of basic services
Increase in the number of countries with national reduction strategies
Enhance international cooperation to developing countries
Increase availability of access to multi hazard early warning systems
CONCLUSION
Lack of resources & sound infrastructure makes the applicability of the Sendai framework
disaster risk reduction difficult e.g. early warning systems becomes ineffective without
proper equipment .
Lack of funds.
Lack of cooperation due to continued human hazards which lead to disasters making it
ineffective to implement the Sendai framework disaster risk reduction.
To a greater extent the Sendai framework disaster risk reduction targets were of a failure
because of some of the reasons mentioned above.