Aristotle took a scientific approach to understanding reality and disagreed with Plato's view of two worlds. For Aristotle, this world is the only reality we can access, and through observation we can understand it. Aristotle also extended this view to how humans aspire for their purpose or "telos" of happiness and flourishing by achieving their full potential. While people may pursue different things, Aristotle believed happiness is ultimately what motivates all human action and striving.
Aristotle took a scientific approach to understanding reality and disagreed with Plato's view of two worlds. For Aristotle, this world is the only reality we can access, and through observation we can understand it. Aristotle also extended this view to how humans aspire for their purpose or "telos" of happiness and flourishing by achieving their full potential. While people may pursue different things, Aristotle believed happiness is ultimately what motivates all human action and striving.
Aristotle took a scientific approach to understanding reality and disagreed with Plato's view of two worlds. For Aristotle, this world is the only reality we can access, and through observation we can understand it. Aristotle also extended this view to how humans aspire for their purpose or "telos" of happiness and flourishing by achieving their full potential. While people may pursue different things, Aristotle believed happiness is ultimately what motivates all human action and striving.
Aristotle took a scientific approach to understanding reality and disagreed with Plato's view of two worlds. For Aristotle, this world is the only reality we can access, and through observation we can understand it. Aristotle also extended this view to how humans aspire for their purpose or "telos" of happiness and flourishing by achieving their full potential. While people may pursue different things, Aristotle believed happiness is ultimately what motivates all human action and striving.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13
THE GOOD L IF E
• Everyone is in pursuit of the good life.
• We do certain things because we want to achieve a life which will make us happy and content. • People’s definition of good life may vary and differ in the particulars. • In generals, we recognize universal truths that cuts our differences. • In Ancient Greece, long before the word “science” has been coined the need to understand the world and reality was bound with need to understand the self and the good life. • For Plato, the task of understanding the things in the world runs parallel with the job truly getting into what will make the soul flourish. • It was Aristotle who gave a definitive distinction between the theoretical and practical sciences. Theoretical disciplines- “Truth” is the aim (logic, biology physics and metaphysics, among others.) Practical disciplines- “good” is the end goal (ethics and politics) Aristotle and How We All Aspire for Good Life • It is interesting to note that the first philosopher who approached the problem of reality from a “scientific” lens as we know now, is also the first thinker who dabbled into the complex problematization of the end goal of life; happiness. This man is none other than Aristotle. • Aristotle embarked on a different approach in figuring out reality. In contrast to Plato who thought that things in this world are not real and are only copies of the real in the world of forms, Aristotle puts everything back to the ground in claiming that this world is all there is to it and that this world is only reality we can all access. • For Plato, change is so perplexing that it can only make sense if there are two realities: the world of forms and the world of matter. • Plato recognized change as a process and as a phenomenon that happens in the world, that in fact, it is constant. However, Plato also claims that despite the reality of change, things remain and they retain their ultimate “whatness”; • Plato was convinced that reality is full of these seemingly contrasting manifestation of change and permanence. For Plato, this can only be explained by postulating two aspects of reality, two worlds if you wish: the world of forms and the world of matter. For Plato, this can only be explained by postulating two aspects of reality, two worlds if you wish:
• the world of forms- things are changing and
impermanent • the world of matter- entities are only copies of the ideal and models, and world of forms are only real entities. Aristotle for his part, disagreed with his teacher’s position and forwarded the idea that there is no reality over and above what the senses can perceive. As such, it is only by observation of the external world that one can truly understand what reality is all about. Change is a process that is inherent in things. We, along with all others entities in the world, start as potentialities and move toward actualities. The movement, of course, entails change. • Aristotle extends this analysis from the external world into the province of the human person and declares that even human beings are potentialities who aspire for their actuality. Ever human being moves according to an end. Every action that emanates from a human person is a function of the purpose (telos) that the person has. • Every human person, according to Aristotle, aspires for an end. This end, we have learned from the previous chapters, is happiness or human flourishing. No individual- young or old, fat or skinny male or female – resists happiness. We all want to be happy, Aristotle claims happiness is the be all and end all of everything that we do. We may not realize it but the end goal of everything that we do is happiness. If you ask one person why he is doing what he is doing, he may not readily say that it is happiness that motivates him. Had- pressed to explain why he is motivated by what motivates him will reveal that happiness is the grand, motivating force in everything that he does. When Aristotle claims that we want to be happy, he does not necessarily mean the everyday happiness that we obtain when we win a competition or we eat our favorite dish in a restaurant. What Aristotle actually means is human flourishing, a kind of contentment in knowing that one is getting the best out of life. A kind of feeling that one has maxed out his potentials in the world, that he has attained the crux of his humanity.