Web Analytics: "We Think We Want Information When Really We Want Knowledge."
Web Analytics: "We Think We Want Information When Really We Want Knowledge."
Web Analytics: "We Think We Want Information When Really We Want Knowledge."
• A potential customer receives an offer from you via snail mail. This
contains a coupon that they take into your brick-and-mortar store to
make their purchase. At the point of sale, your store sends the
purchase details (product name, value, coupon code, and so forth)
via the Internet to your Google Analytics account.
The digital touch point in this example was the actual purchase.
• If a = number of direct mailings sent = 100,000
• b = number of purchases with coupon = 725
then
• campaign performance = b / a = 0.7%
EXAMPLE
Suppose your direct mail encourages recipients to visit your website
first in order to obtain their coupon code. The second digital touch
point is your website, and visits to it reflect the interest in your offer.
For example, if
a = number of direct mailings sent = 100,000
b = number of purchases with coupon = 725
c = number of campaign visitors to your website = 8,000
(c) tells you that evaluating the results of a direct mailing is not as
black and white as just the number of purchases:
8,000 people are actually interested in your offer; without this piece of
information, it looks like only 725 people are interested.
Learning Objective
• Why is it Useful?
• Allows experimentation
You have so little actionable insight because clickstream data is great at the what, but not at the why. That is one of the limits of
clickstream data. We know every click that everyone ever makes and more. We have the what: What pages did people view on our
website? What products did people purchase? What was the average time spent? What sources did they come from? What keywords
or campaigns produced clicks? What this, and what that, and what not? You need to find out ways to answer the why!
Key questions associated with Web Analytics 2.0
THANK YOU