Why Smoking Should Be Banned

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

WHY SMOKING

SHOULD BE
BANNED
Muhammad dylan alghifari
Tantio arfito pratama
Brian muhammad cahyo
Muhammad aldrich revelin
Yusuf akmal
Secondhand smoke exposure is clearly linked with negative outcomes on a person’s
health. While the exact degree of harm is debatable, a recent study published in the
medical journal Circulation reviewed 13 studies from around the world and found
that banning smoking in public places can reduce heart attack hospitalizations by up
to 36 percent over time, regardless of geographical location. Clearly, it’s become
increasingly more difficult to make a case that secondhand smoke causes no
measurable injury to the breather — especially over time. The scientific evidence that
links secondhand smoke with heart disease and cancer has been mounting for
decades. Not only that, the effects of temporary exposure to smoke are also well
documented and include headaches, breathing problems, and even nausea. The
bottom line is that secondhand smoke has numerous short-term and long-term
consequences for innocent bystanders.

1.SECONDHAND SMOKE HAS SERIOUS NEGATIVE


HEALTH CONSEQUENCES
Cigarette butts account for millions of pieces of litter annually and detracts from
a location’s aesthetic. If smokers would dispose of their waste properly when
they’re in public places, this might not be an issue, but the fact of the matter is
that they don’t. The evidence is there, littering attractive buildings and the
surrounding landscape with cigarette butts. A smoking ban would reduce litter.
Although not a primary argument in support of a public smoking ban, it is still a
credible one.

2. LITTER REDUCTION
  In bars and restaurants and other establishments that permit smoking, many
patrons find the smell of cigarettes to be unpleasant and annoying. Cigarette
smoke tends to linger on people’s clothes and hair and takes longer to fade
even after the offending party has left. Clothes worn to a smoky bar may still
smell like smoke days later.

3: THE LINGERING ODOR OF STALE


CIGARETTES.
 It is the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe and healthy
environment for its employees. While many workers choose to work in
workplaces that permit smoking, others may prefer not to be around smoke but
persist because they need the employment. A smoking ban opponent may
simply say, “work somewhere without smoke,” yet I would argue that your
insistence on smoking in public is not as important as that employee’s health
and livelihood. Smokers’ unwillingness to control their urges should not force
people to change jobs in the name of personal health and welfare.

NO. 4: THE RIGHT TO A HEALTHY


WORKPLACE
 We’re not talking only about the high cost of the smoking habit, which can
average $1,500 a year just for the cigarettes. But there also are smoking
medical costs. For example, a smoker with poor lung function may have much
higher medical bills because of the smoking habit. Smokers also pay more for
life insurance and health insurance than nonsmokers, because of their higher
risk of health care costs. Smoking lowers the potential resale value of home
and cars, because most buyers are not interested in purchasing a house or car
that smells like cigarettes. Not to mention the cost to businesses and taxpayers
to beautify streets, buildings and other public places that have been littered and
damaged by smoking. These are some of the hidden costs of smoking.

NO. 5: THE COST OF SECONDHAND


SMOKE.

You might also like