1. The document discusses various laws governing succession and wills when there are foreign elements involved, such as the deceased or their properties spanning multiple countries.
2. There are two main theories for determining the proper law: the unitary system applies one law to govern all properties, while the split or scission system distinguishes between real and personal property, applying the law of the property's location to real property and the deceased's domicile to personal property.
3. The document examines Philippine conflict of laws rules regarding the extrinsic and intrinsic validity of wills, noting that extrinsic validity is governed by the law of execution while intrinsic validity follows the national law of the deceased.
1. The document discusses various laws governing succession and wills when there are foreign elements involved, such as the deceased or their properties spanning multiple countries.
2. There are two main theories for determining the proper law: the unitary system applies one law to govern all properties, while the split or scission system distinguishes between real and personal property, applying the law of the property's location to real property and the deceased's domicile to personal property.
3. The document examines Philippine conflict of laws rules regarding the extrinsic and intrinsic validity of wills, noting that extrinsic validity is governed by the law of execution while intrinsic validity follows the national law of the deceased.
1. The document discusses various laws governing succession and wills when there are foreign elements involved, such as the deceased or their properties spanning multiple countries.
2. There are two main theories for determining the proper law: the unitary system applies one law to govern all properties, while the split or scission system distinguishes between real and personal property, applying the law of the property's location to real property and the deceased's domicile to personal property.
3. The document examines Philippine conflict of laws rules regarding the extrinsic and intrinsic validity of wills, noting that extrinsic validity is governed by the law of execution while intrinsic validity follows the national law of the deceased.
1. The document discusses various laws governing succession and wills when there are foreign elements involved, such as the deceased or their properties spanning multiple countries.
2. There are two main theories for determining the proper law: the unitary system applies one law to govern all properties, while the split or scission system distinguishes between real and personal property, applying the law of the property's location to real property and the deceased's domicile to personal property.
3. The document examines Philippine conflict of laws rules regarding the extrinsic and intrinsic validity of wills, noting that extrinsic validity is governed by the law of execution while intrinsic validity follows the national law of the deceased.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29
Wills and Succession
Introduction:
In various legal system which respect private enterprise and
recognize the institution of private property, the transfer of assets from one generation to another is considered a great stabilizing force, to which value is attached. But while they agree on the basic idea of inheritance, they differ with respect to the law that governs succession to a person’s estate, where his assets are located in various jurisdictions. Wills and Successions: Foreign Element
Foreign Element can be in the form of a
will executed overseas, of foreigner dying within Philippine Territory and leaving properties here and abroad, of a Filipino dying overseas with properties in the Philippines, of a testator specifying a foreign law to govern the disposition of his estate. Example: Byron Chavez, a Filipino businessman, dies, domiciled in California, and leaves real and personal properties in various places: a house and lot in California, big parcels of land in Cebu City and suburbans; substantial shares of stock in a number of multi national corporations; and considerable bank deposits in Manila and New York
1. What law or laws determine who will succeed, and to what
extent, to Chavez’s assets? 2. Does it matter whether proceedings for the administration of the Chavez estate to take place in California, his domicile at the time of his death, or in the Philippines, his country ? Choice of Law: Theories or System
Theories or System in determining the
proper law for the transmission of successional rights:
UNITARY SYSTEM
SPLIT OR SCISSION SYSTEM
UNITARY SYSTEM
Unitary or Single system – only one law
determines transmission of real as well as personal properties. e.i. Philippines (The national law of the deceased governs the transmission of both real as well as personal properties). SPLIT or DIVISION
Splitor Division system, succession to real
property is governed by the lex situs, while succession to movable or personal property is governed by the law of the domicile of the deceased at the time of his death. WILLS AND SUCCESSION
Will – is an act whereby a person is
permitted, with the formalities prescribed by law, to control to a certain degree the disposition of his estate, to take effect after his death. (Art. 783 CC) WILLS AND SUCCESSION
Succession, is a mode of acquisition by
virtue of which the property, rights and obligations to the extent of the value of inheritance, of a person are transmitted through his death to another or others either by his will or by operation of law (Art. 774 CC) Validity of Wills:
◦ Extrinsic validity – deals with the forms and
solemnities in the making of wills, which include the age and testamentary capacity of the testator and the form of the will.
◦ Intrinsic validity- refers to the validity of the
dispositions made by the decedent. It concerns on the order of succession, the amount of successional rights and such other matters that fall under the term “substance” as distinguished from “forms and solemnities” of wills. Philippine Conflict Rules on Extrinsic Validity of Wills Art. 17 CC, The forms and solemnities of contracts, wills, and other public instruments shall be governed by the laws of the country in which they are executed. When the acts referred to are executed before the diplomatic or consular officials of the Republic of the Philippines in a foreign country, the solemnities established by Philippine laws shall be observed in their execution. Xxx
Article 815 CC,
When a Filipino is in a foreign country, he is authorized to make a will in any of the forms established by the law of the country in which he may be. Such will may be probated in the Philippines. Philippine Conflict Rules on Extrinsic Validity of Wills: Alien Art. 816 CC,
The will of an alien who is abroad produces the effect in
the Philippines if made with the formalities prescribed by the law of the place in which he resides, or according to the formalities observed in his country, or in conformity with those which this Code prescribes. When the acts referred to are executed before the diplomatic or consular officials of the Republic of the Philippines in a foreign country, the solemnities established by Philippine laws shall be observed in their execution. Philippine Conflict Rules on Extrinsic Validity of Wills: Other provisions Art. 817 CC,
A will made in the Philippines by a citizen or
subject of another country, which is executed in accordance with the law of the country of which he is a citizen or subject, and which might be proved and allowed by the law of his own country, shall have the same effect as if executed according to the laws of the Philippines. JOINT WILLS: PROHIBITED
ART. 818 CC,
Two or more persons cannot make a will jointly, or in the same instrument, either for their reciprocal benefit or for the benefit of a third person.
Art. 819 CC,
Wills, prohibited by the preceding article, executed by Filipinos in a foreign country shall not be valid in the Philippines, even though authorized by the laws of the country where they may have been executed. HOLOGRAPHIC WILL Art. 810 CC,
Holographic will, which must be entirely written,
dated, and signed by the hand of the testator himself, it is subject to no other form and may be made in or out of the Philippines, and need not be witnessed. REVOCATION OF WILL
Art. 829 CC,
A revocation done outside the Philippines, by a person who does not have his domicile in this country, is valid when it is done according to the law of the place where the will was made, or according to the law of the place in which the testator had his domicile at the time; and if the revocation takes place in this country, when it is in accordance with the provisions of the Code. REVOCATION Ifthe revocation is done outside the Philippines by a person who is domiciled here, it is valid in accordance with our law (lex domicilii) or the lex loci actus of the revocation (the place where the revocation was made)
Principle of dependent relative revocation- if the
subsequent will is denied probate by reason of its defective execution, the earlier will may then be entitled to probate if proved to be duly and properly executed. Philippine Law on intrinsic validity of wills Art. 16 CC, 2nd par. xxx intestate and testamentary successions, both with respect to the order of succession and to the amount of successional rights and to the intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions, shall be regulated by the national law of the person whose succession is under consideration, whatever may be nature of the property and regardless of the country wherein said property may be found.
◦ This was followed by the Supreme Court in Miciano vs.
Brimo, 50 Phil. 867; Bellis vs. Bellis, 20 SCRA 558; and Cayetano vs. Leonidas, 129 SCRA 522. Philippine Law on intrinsic validity of wills Under the Unitary System adopted from Roman Law, the intrinsic validity of wills is governed by the national law of the decedent.
Refrerence: Art. 16, par. 2 of the CC
BAR Problem: Civil 2015 Joint Wills Art. 818 CC states that: “Two or more persons cannot make a will jointly or in the same instrument either for their reciprocal benefit or for the benefit of a third person”
Joint wills whether executed by Filipinos in the
Philippines or abroad, even if such foreign country allows it, are considered VOID in the Philippines on ground of Public Policy. Joint Wills Although the law expressly invalidates joint wills executed by Filipinos in a foreign country which allows such, it is silent about joint wills executed in the Philippines by aliens whose national laws does not prohibit it.
However, it is suggested that in accordance with
the expressed policy in Art. 819 of the CC, said will should not be probated if it affects heirs in the Philippines DEPECAGE Depecage (from the French “depecer” meaning “to dissect” is a term for the phenomenon where “different aspects of a case involving a foreign element may be governed by different systems of laws. Summary: Extrinsic and Intrinsic Validity
The extrinsic validity of wills is governed by the law of
the place where they are executed; The intrinsic validity of a will is governed by the national law of the decedent.
(The intrinsic validity of wills under the Civil Code is
governed by Arts. 798 to 803, which governs wills executed by citizens of the Philippines wherever they may have been executed, as his national law follows him in his travels in accordance with the art. 15 in relation to 2nd par. of Art. 16 the CC.) PROBATE OF THE WILL
The probate of a will refers to the
authentication of a will in a probate proceedings in court concerning the capacity of the testator and the compliance with those requisites or solemnities which the law prescribes for its validity.
Mandatory. Effect of Probate:
Once probated, the principle of res judicata
applies, with respect to its extrinsic validity. This means that the testator was of sound mind and disposing mind at the time when he executed the will and was not acting under duress, etc. and that the will was signed by him in the presence of the required number of witnesses, and that the will is genuine and is not a forgery. Allowance of Will Proved Outside of Philippines and Administration of Estate A will may be probated outside the Philippines. Rule 77 of the Rules of Court provides the procedure on the allowance of will proved outside the Philippines and administration of estate.
When a decedent has properties in the Philippines
and abroad, the administration of his estate will require the appointment of a domiciliary or principal adminstrator and an ancillary administrator with respect to properties abroad. Evidence necessary for the reprobate or allowance of will in the country, which has been probated outside the Philippines: 1. The due execution of the will in accordance with the foreign law; 2. The testator has his domicile in the foreign country and not in the Philippines; 3. The will has been admitted to probate in such country; 4. The fact that the foreign tribunal is a probate court; and 5. The laws of a foreign country on probate and allowance of wills. Ancillary Administrator vis-à-vis Principal Administrator
When a person dies intestate owning property in the
country of his domicile as well as in a foreign country, administration shall be had in both countries. That which is granted in the jurisdiction of the decedent’s domicile is termed the principal administration.
The ancillary administration is proper whenever a
person dies leaving in a country other than that of his domicile, property to be administered in the nature of assets of the decedent, liable for his individual debts or to be distributed among his heirs. Grounds for the disallowance of the Will
Rule 76 Sec. 9. Grounds for disallowing will. - The will
shall be disallowed in any of the following cases: (a) If not executed and attested as required by law; (b) If the testator was insane, or otherwise mentally incapable to make a will, at the time of its execution; (c) If it was executed under duress, or the influence of fear, or threats; (d) If it was procured by undue and improper pressure and influence, on the part of the beneficiary, or of some other person for his benefit; (e) If the signature of the testator was procured by fraud or trick, and he did not intend that the instrument should be his will at the time of fixing his signature thereto.