6 Compensation Management

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 24

Compensation Management

1. Pay and Incentive Systems


2. Indirect Compensation: Employee Benefit Plans
Pay and Incentive Systems
Questions This Chapter Will Help Managers Answer

• How can we tie compensation strategy to general business


strategy?
• What economic and legal factors should we consider in
establishing pay levels for different jobs?
• What is the best way to develop pay systems that are
understandable, workable, and acceptable to employees at all
levels?
• How can we tie incentives to individual, team, or
organizationwide performance?
• In implementing a pay-for-performance system, what key
traps must we avoid to make the system work as planned?

© McGraw-Hill Education
Changes in Company Philosophies Concerning Pay and Benefits

Increased willingness to:

• Reduce the size of the workforce


• Outsource jobs overseas
• Restrict pay to control the costs of wages, salaries, and benefits

Less concern with pay position relative to that of competitors


and more concern with what the company can afford

Implementation of programs to encourage and reward


performance
• Makes pay more variable

© McGraw-Hill Education
Organizational Reward System

Includes anything an employee values and desires that an


employer is able and willing to offer in exchange for employee
contributions

Compensation: Includes both financial and nonfinancial rewards

Should provide the following in order to be effective:

• Sufficient level of rewards to fulfill basic needs


• Equity with the external labor market and within the organization
• Treatment of each member of the organization in terms of his or
her individual needs

© McGraw-Hill Education
Dimensions of Equity in Pay Systems

Internal equity
• In terms of the relative worth of individual jobs to an organization,
are pay rates fair?

External equity
• Are the wages paid by an organization fair in terms of competitive
market rates outside the organization?

Individual equity
• Is each individual’s pay fair relative to that of other individuals doing
the same or similar jobs?

© McGraw-Hill Education
Bases for Determining Equitable Payment: Common Points in Theories

Employees perceive a fair return for what they contribute to


their jobs

Employees determine what their equitable return should be


after comparing their inputs and outcomes with those of their
peers or coworkers
• Better known as social comparison

Employees who perceive themselves to be in an inequitable


situation will seek to reduce that inequity
• May mentally distort their inputs or outcomes, directly alter their
inputs or outcomes, or leave the organization

© McGraw-Hill Education
Viewing Compensation from a Strategic Perspective: Firm’s Actions

• Compensation is recognized as a pivotal control and incentive


mechanism that can be used flexibly by management to attain
business objectives
• Pay system is made an integral part of strategy formulation
• Pay considerations are integrated into strategic decision-
making processes, such as those that involve planning and
control
• Firm’s performance is viewed as the ultimate criterion of the
success of strategic pay decisions and operational
compensation programs

© McGraw-Hill Education
Determinants of Pay Structure and Level

Labor market conditions

Legislation

Collective bargaining
• Affects the following key factors:
• The level of wages
• The behavior of workers in relevant labor markets

Managerial attitudes

An organization’s ability to pay

© McGraw-Hill Education
Purposes of Job Descriptions

Identify important characteristics of each job, so that the relative


worth of jobs can be determined

Help identify, define, and weight compensable factors


• Compensable factors: Common job characteristics that an
organization is willing to pay for, such as skill, effort, responsibility,
and working conditions

© McGraw-Hill Education
Job Evaluation
• Provides a work-related and business-related rationale to
support decisions about pay
• Objective: To rank jobs in terms of their relative worth to the
organization, so that an equitable rate of pay can be
determined for each job
• Different job evaluation methods yield different rank-orders of
jobs, and therefore different pay structures

© McGraw-Hill Education
Developing a Pay Structure: Rules of Thumb

• Jobs of the same general value should be clustered into the


same pay grade
• Jobs that clearly differ in value should be in different pay
grades
• There should be a smooth progression of point groupings
• New system should fit realistically into the existing allocation
of pay within a company
• Pay grades should conform reasonably well to pay patterns in
the relevant labor markets

© McGraw-Hill Education
Alternatives to Pay Systems Based on Job Evaluation

Market-based pay system


• Uses a direct market-pricing approach for all of a firm’s jobs
• Feasible if all jobs are benchmark jobs and direct matches can be
found in the market
• Benchmark jobs: Characterized by stable tasks and stable job
specifications

Competency-based pay system


• Workers are paid on the basis of their skills or on their depth of
knowledge, both of which are termed “competencies”
• In such learning environments, the more workers learn, the more
they earn

© McGraw-Hill Education
Incentives for Executives, 1

Companies, with a history of outperforming their rivals, have the


following characteristics:

• Long-term strategic view of their executives


• Stability in their executive groups

Elements of executive reward systems


• Base salary; annual, or short-term, incentives; long-term incentives;
employee benefits; and perquisites

Annual, or short-term, incentive plans


• Encourage the efficient use of existing assets
• Usually based on indicators of corporate performance

© McGraw-Hill Education
Incentives for Executives, 2

Long-term plans
• Encourage the development of new processes, plants, and products
that open new markets and restore old ones
• Designed to reward strategic gains rather than short-term
contributions to profits
• Examples
• Performance shares: Stock grants awarded for meeting goals
• Performance-accelerated shares: Stock that vests sooner if the
executive meets goals ahead of schedule
• Restricted stock: Common stock that vests after a specified period
• Restricted stock units: Shares awarded over time to defer taxes

© McGraw-Hill Education
Incentives for Lower-Level Employees

Employees’ pay is supplemented with additions related to


improvements in job performance
• Lump-sum bonus: Employees receive an end-of-year bonus that
does not build into base pay
• Spot bonus: Awarded if an employee’s performance has been
exceptional

Individual incentive plans have a baseline, or normal,


performance standard
• Productivity above this standard is rewarded

© McGraw-Hill Education
Performance Standards

Provide a relatively objective definition of the job

Give employees targets to shoot for

Make it easier for supervisors to assign work equitably

In setting performance standards for production work, the ideal


job should:

• Be highly repetitive
• Have a short job cycle
• Produce a clear, measurable output

© McGraw-Hill Education
Incentive System: Union Attitudes
• Incentive systems set up by unionized employers are subject
to negotiation through collective bargaining
• Unions may wish to participate in the day-to-day management
of the incentive system
• Union attitudes toward incentives vary with the type of
incentive offered

© McGraw-Hill Education
Team Incentives, 1

Appropriate when jobs are highly interrelated

Provide an opportunity for each team member to receive a


bonus based on the output of the team as a whole

Aim to increase productivity and improve morale

Advantages
• Make it possible to reward workers who provide essential services
to line workers
• Encourage cooperation, not competition, among workers

© McGraw-Hill Education
Team Incentives, 2

Disadvantages
• Competition between teams
• Inability of workers to see their individual contributions to the
output of the team
• Top performers who grow disenchanted with having to carry “free
riders”

© McGraw-Hill Education
Organization wide Incentives: Profit-Sharing

Paid out if a firm meets its profitability target

Reasons for use


• To provide a group incentive for increased productivity
• To provide retirement income for employees
• To institute a flexible reward structure that reflects a company’s
actual economic position
• To enhance employees’ security and identification with the
company
• To attract and retain workers more easily
• To educate individuals about the factors that underlie business
success and the capitalistic system

© McGraw-Hill Education
Organization wide Incentives: Gain-Sharing

Results-based program that links pay to performance at the


facility level

Comprises the following elements:

• Philosophy of cooperation
• Involvement system
• Financial bonus

© McGraw-Hill Education
Gain-Sharing versus Profit-Sharing

Gain-sharing Profit-sharing
• Based on a measure of • Based on a global profitability
productivity measure
• Frequent events, distributed • Annual measure and reward
monthly or quarterly

• Current distribution plan • Deferred payment

© McGraw-Hill Education
Key Terms, 2
• Consumer-driven health
plan, or C D H P
• Pension
• Vested
• Defined-benefit plans
• Defined-contribution plan
• Cash-balance plan
• Cost shifting
• Cafeteria benefits
• Flexible-spending accounts
• Money purchase plan

© McGraw-Hill Education

You might also like