Lecture On The Judicial Affidavit Rule: A.M. NO. 12-8-8-SC
Lecture On The Judicial Affidavit Rule: A.M. NO. 12-8-8-SC
Lecture On The Judicial Affidavit Rule: A.M. NO. 12-8-8-SC
Consists of 12 Sections
A.M. No. 11-6-10-SC (21 February 2012) Court en banc approved the pilot
testing of the Guidelines for
Litigation in Quezon City Trial
Affidavits in lieu of direct testimony – for civil cases,
Courts wherein one of the salient
direct examination of all witnesses shall be presented provisions thereof is the
through affidavits preferably in question-and-answer submission of affidavits in lieu of
format; for criminal cases, allowed if (1) parties agree to direct testimony was made
submit affidavits and (2) to prove the civil liability (QC
Practice Guidelines) mandatory
NOTE: It can be said that the subject Guidelines served as basis for
the approval by the Court of the use of Judicial Affidavits (except that
the FORM and CONTENT requirements are much stricter and the
application to criminal cases is much different)
→
(1) where the maximum of the imposable penalty does not exceed
six (6) years;
(3) with respect to the civil aspect of the actions, whatever the
penalties involved are
prosecution to submit judicial affidavits not later than 5 days before
the pre-trial, serving copies of the same upon the accused
if accused desires to be heard on his defense, he shall have the
option to submit his judicial affidavit as well as those of his witnesses
within ten (10) days from receipt of the prosecution’s affidavits
Effect of non-compliance with the Judicial Affidavit Rule (Sec. 10) –
failure to submit affidavits on time: deemed to have waived their
submission
court may allow once the late submission provided that: (i) delay is
for a valid reason; (ii) would not unduly prejudice the opposing party;
and, (iii) the defaulting party pays a fine of not less than P1,000.00 nor
more than P5,000.00, at the discretion of the court
court not to consider the affidavit of any absent witness and counsel
who is absent without a valid cause shall be deemed to have waived
his client’s right to cross-examine the witness
court shall not admit as evidence judicial affidavits that do not conform
to the content requirements of Section 3 and the attestation
requirement of Section 4; but may allow the submission of
compliant replacement affidavits provided that: (i) delay is for a valid
reason; (ii) would not unduly prejudice the opposing party; and, (iii) the
defaulting party pays a fine of not less than P1,000.00 nor more than
P5,000.00, at the discretion of the court
Repeal or modification of inconsistent rules (Sec. 11) –
the provisions of the Rules of Court and the rules of procedure
governing investigating officers and bodies authorized by the
SC to receive evidence are REPEALED or MODIFIED insofar
as these are INCONSISTENT with the provisions of this Rule