Proximal Biceps

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

PROXIMAL BICEPS TENDON

ANATOMY
• Biceps Labral Complex (BLC) - Superior
labrum + LHBT
• BLC – Three zones; Inside, Junction,
Tunnel
• Inside – Sup. Labruum + Biceps anchor
• Junction – Intra articular LHBT + Pulleys
• Tunnel – Extra articular LHBT + Bicipital
tunnel (fibro – osseous)
• Superior labrum – histologically distinct
from inferior labrum
• Posterior labrum – closely resembles
LHBT

(Clin Sports Med 2016;35(1):01-18)


ANATOMY
Biceps Anchor
• LHBT directly attaches to supraglenoid tubercle –
50%
• Closely associated with sup. Labrum – 50%
• Four anatomical variants of attachment described
• Type I – entirely post. Labrum
• Type II – predominantly posterior
• Type III – equally anterior & posterior
• Type IV – mostly anterior

(Clin Sports Med 2016;35(1):01-18)


ANATOMY
Intra-articular LHBT
• Average length – 99 – 138 mm
• Needs 19 mm excursion for normal ROM
• Blood supply – sup. labral tributaries proximally &
ascending branches of ant. circumflex
• LHBT has nocioceptive neural elements
(Musculocutaneous nerve)
• Intra articular delivery of LHBT – gold standard
diagnostic modality for pathologic lesions
ANATOMY
Biceps Reflexion Pulley
• Capsulo – ligamentous complex
• Stabelizes LHBT within zone I of bicipital groove
• Contribution – CHL, SGHL, Subscapularis &
Supraspinatus tendons
• Arthroscopically – anteromedial and posterolateral
biceps reflection pulleys
• Pulleys are vulnerable to injury due to repeated
shear forces

(Clin Sports Med 2016;35(1):01-18)


ANATOMY
Bicipital Tunnel
• Fibro-osseous enclosure of extra-articular LHBT
• Often conceal hidden lesions
• Divided in to 3 anatomic zones

Function
• Source of debate & controversy
• EMG – show relative inactivity during isolated shoulder mvt
• Cadaver studies – mainly depressor, important for anterior/ posterior &
inferior stability
• Most clinically relevant study by Giphart et. al. – little effect on gleno-
humeral kinamatics
(J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24(4):215 -24)
EXAMINATION
• Popeye deformity (do not miss a SOL) • Biceps Tenderness – hallmark of biceps
• Ludington Test – complete tear disorders
• Elbow flexed & arm 10 IR
EXAMINATION
Biceps Instability tests Yergason’s Test
• Dynamic – tendon subluxate in & out of • Used to diagnose degenerative &
the groove with mvt inflammatory conditions
• Static – typically seen with pulley injury or • Reliability is controversial
Ssc tendon tear
EXAMINATION
Speed’s Test Other Tests
• Main clinical utility for biceps pathology • Lift - off Test
• Also positive for SLAP, Cuff tears & OA • Biceps Entrapment Test
• Dynamic Shear Test
• Active Compression Test – O’Brien
PROXIMAL BICEPS DISORDERS
Inflammatory Instability
Primary Tendonitis • Subluxation/ dislocation of LHBT
• Inflammation in the groove without • Rotator interval injury, pulley rupture, SSC
tendon injury, SLAP injuries
associated pathology
• Overuse
Rupture
• Partial split/ fraying/ complete rupture
Secondary Tendonitis
• secondary to: overuse, attrition,
• Chronic inflammation with associated
impingement, chronic inflammation,
shoulder pathology
instability
SYMPTOMS OF BICEPS DISORDERS
Tendonitis Instability
• Anterior shoulder pain • Snapping or clicking
• Along bicipital groove • Anterior shoulder pain
• Made worse by activity
• Worse at night Rupture
• Unable to sleep on the affected shoulder • Sudden audible pop
• Radiates down the arm • Sudden onset severe sharp pain
• Biceps cramps
• Anterior arm bruising
• weakness
• Popeye sign
IMAGING STUDIES - USS
Cheap but highly operator dependent Instability
Tendinopathy • USS can not assess pulley injuries
• Tendon thickening • “chondral Print” indirect US sign due to
• Synovial hypertrophy chondral erosion
• Fluid around the tendon in the groove
• Accuracy – 50% - 96%
IMAGING STUDIES - USS
• Rupture
Instability
• Absence of LHBT in the groove & cranially
• USS shows excellent accuracy to detect – “empty groove”
LHBT subluxation/ dislocation
• Retracted tendon stump
• Dynamic studies can be done
• +/- upper SSC tendon injury
IMAGING STUDIES - MRI
• Preferred imaging modality with/without
contrast
• Visualisation relies on sequences on the
proper plane

Degeneration Subluxation/ Dislocation


IMAGING STUDIES - MRI
Tendonitis Rupture
MANAGEMENT – NON OPERATIVE
NSAIDS Other Modalities
• Beneficial in short term to control pain &
swelling • Topical Nitro-glycerine
• Little benefit in treating chronic tendon • Iontophoresis
injuries
• Phonophoresis
(Am Fam Physician 2013;87(7):486)
• Theraputic US therapy
Steroids
• Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
• Provide short term anti inflammatory effect
• Low - level laser therapy
• Can be US guided injection
(Am Fam Physician 2013;87(7):486)
• Risk of LHBT rupture
• Preferred LA – Ropivacain (less chondrotoxic)
(J bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(5):986-91)
MANAGEMENT – NON OPERATIVE
Regenerative Injection Therapy Rehab Programmes
• US guided • Acute Phase
• Important role in non surgical Mx • Pain control, restore muscle balance, baseline
dynamic stability
• Induce an inflammatory response to regenerate
damaged tissue • Intermediate phase
• strengthening, increasing flexibility, Improving ROM,
- Dextrose enhancing neuro muscular control
- PRP • Advanced strengthening Phase
- WBC • Aggressive strengthening, restore muscular endurance & power,
prepare to return to activity
- RBC
• Return to activity phase
- Stem cells
(Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010;21(3):585 – 605) (Clin Sports Med 2016;35(1):75-92)
MANAGEMENT - OPERATIVE
Indications Tenotomy vs. Tenodesis
• LHBT injury/ tear (25% - 50% OF tendon • Several variables need to be considered
diameter)
- Age
• Instability
- Functional demand
• Tenosynovitis
- Cosmesis
• Bicipital groove pain (usu. due to poor gliding
IIry to longitudinal tear) - Body Habitus
• Failed conservative treatment - Operative time
• SLAP tear - Workers compensation
• Subscap tear with LHBT subluxation - Patient compliance with rehab
MANAGEMENT – OPERATIVE; TENOTOMY
Tenotomy – Surgical options
Arthroscopic Tenotomy
• Quick & technically simple
• Posterior viewing portal & antero superior
working portal
• LHBT retracts in to the groove
• Stump is trimmed

Looped Tenotomy
• Described by Goubier et. al.
• LHBT is looped on itself to prevent retraction
(Arthrosc Tech 2014;3(4):e427-30)
MANAGEMENT – OPERATIVE; TENODESIS
Several techniques have been described Surgical options
• Open/ Arthroscopic • A’copic soft tissue tenodesis
• Fixation – interference screw/ suture anchor/ • A’copic suture anchor tenodesis
sutureless anchor • A’copic knotless anchor tenodesis
• Level – sub • Mini-open suture anchor subpectoral
• Intra osseous/ extra osseous tenodesis
• Mini-open interference screw subpectoral
• Some prefer mini open subpectoral tenodesis tenodesis
– remove pain generators from whole groove • Mini-open key hole tenodesis
• Mini-open bone tunnel tenodesis
MANAGEMENT – OPERATIVE; TENODESIS
MANAGEMENT – OPERATIVE; TENOTOMY VS.
TENODESIS
Tenotomy Tenodesis
Pros • Technically easier • Lower incidence of Popeye deformity
• Fewer post op restrictions • Maintenance of length – tension relationship
• Quicker recovery • Retaining good supination strength
• Shorter operative time

Cons • Higher chance of Popeye deformity • More post op restrictions


• Muscle cramping/ fatigue • Longer recovery
• Longer operative time

(Clin Sports Med 2016;35(1):93-111)


THANK YOU!

You might also like