Seminar On-Planning For Change
Seminar On-Planning For Change
Seminar On-Planning For Change
PLANNING TO SUCCEED
-BRET T BLUMENTHAL
SEMINAR ON-
PLANING FOR CHANGE
Change Transition
CHANGE TRANSITION
E
E
va
va
lu
lu
ati
ati
n
n
g
g
ch
ch
an
an
ge
ge
o
o
ut
ut
co
co
m
m
e
e
fo
fo
rr
th
th
e
e
fu
fu
tu
tu
re
re
MEANING
Solve organizational
problems
Improve performance
Learning from experiences
(benchmarking)
Influence future
Reframe shared changes
perceptions
Adapt to external
environmental changes
Planned change attempts at all aspects of the
organization which are closely interrelated;
TECHNO
TASK
LOGY
STRUCT
PEOPLE
URE
TECHNOLOGY TASK
Normative–
Rational– Power–
reeducative
empirical coercive
Lewin (1951) identified several rules that should be
followed in implementing planned change:
1.Implemented only for good reason.
2.Always be gradual.
3.Should be planned, and not sporadic or sudden.
4.All individuals who may be affected by the change
should be involved in planning for the change.
THEORIES OF PLANNED CHANGE:
Lewins’
Change
Model
Action
research Positive
Model Model
I. Lewins’ Change Model
Kurt Lewin provided the earliest model of
change.
Change as a modification of forces keeping the
UNFREEZING
MOVEMENT
REFREEZING
UNFREE Occurs when the change agent convinces
●
●
REFREE ●
● The change agent assists in stabilizing the
system change and she is being supportive,
Findings:
Leadership style and employee involvement in
D
es
ig
n
a
n
d
d
el
iv
er
w
a
ys
to
cr
e
at
e
fu
tu
re
FORCES LEADING TO PLANNED
CHANGE
●
E.g: insurance agencies,
External forces government, consumer, new
technology etc
2.Develop
2.Develop a
a trusting
trusting relationship
relationship with
with those
those who
who are
are involved
involved in
in the
the change
change
through open communication:
through open communication:
4.Provision of resources
5.Other approaches
OTHER APPROACHES
NEGOTIAT
ION
COOPE COERCI
RATION ON
FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR SLOW
PACE OF INNOVATION ADOPTION
FACTORS
●
● Characteristic
Characteristic of
of the
the
innovation
innovation
● Characteristics of the
●
Characteristics of the
innovation
innovation adopters
adopters
● Contextual factors
Contextual factors
●
Actions to avoid during planned
change:
Simply announce a change without laying the
foundation
Ignore or offend powerful people
Violate the authority and communication lines in an
organization
Rely only on formal authority
Overestimate your formal authority
Organizational change in hospitals: a
qualitative case-study of staff perspectives
Results
Some staff expressed apprehension and held negative
expectations regarding the organizational change.
Concerns included inadequate staffing and potential for
collaboration breakdown due to new layout of workspaces.
These fears were compounded by current experiences of
feeling uninformed about the change, as well as feelings of
being fatigued and under-staffed in the constantly changing
hospital environment.
Nevertheless, balancing this, many staff reported positive
expectations regarding the benefits to patients of the change
and the potential for staff to adapt in the face of this change.
Conclusions
Throughout the processes of organizational change, such
as a hospital redevelopment, staff needs to be engaged,
adequately informed, trained, and to feel supported by
management.
The use of champions of varying professions and lead
departments may be useful to address concerns,
adequately inform, and promote a sense of engagement
among staff.
Higgins D, Bourne PA. Sch J Psychol & Behav Sci. 2018; 1(1):2641-1768
REFERENCES
Vati J.Principles and practice of nursing
management and administration: for B.Sc. and M.Sc.
Nursing . 2nd ed. Haryana : Jaypee brothers medical
publisher;2013.p.167-69
Basavanthappa BT. Nursing administration. 3rd ed.