Macroeconomics: Events and Ideas: Krugman/Wells
Macroeconomics: Events and Ideas: Krugman/Wells
Macroeconomics: Events and Ideas: Krugman/Wells
33
>> Macroeconomics: Events
and Ideas
Krugman/Wells
3 of 41
Classical Macroeconomics
The first modern school of economic thought.
Its major developers include Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste
Say, David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus and John Stuart
Mill.
Classical macroeconomics asserted that monetary policy
affected only the aggregate price level, not aggregate
output.
Classical macroeconomics asserted that the short run was
unimportant.
According to the classical model, prices are flexible, making
the aggregate supply curve vertical even in the short run.
4 of 41
Classical Macroeconomics
As a result, an increase in the money supply leads,
other things equal, to an equal proportional rise in
the aggregate price level, with no effect on
aggregate output.
Increases in the money supply lead to inflation, and
that’s all.
5 of 41
Classical Macroeconomics
By the 1930s, measurement of business cycles
was a well-established subject, but there was no
widely accepted theory of business cycles.
In 1920 Wesley Mitchell founded National Bureau
of Economic Research, an independent, nonprofit
organization that to this day has the official role of
declraing the beginnings of recessions and
expansions. The measurement of business cycle
was advanced by 1930.
The term macroeconomics appears in 1933 by
Norwegian economist Ragnar Frisch.
6 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
When Did the Business Cycle Begin?
7 of 41
The Great Depression and the Keynesian
Revolution
In 1936, Keynes presented his analysis of the
Great Depression—his explanation of what was
wrong with the economy’s alternator—in a book
titled The General Theory of Employment,
Interest, and Money.
The school of thought that emerged out of the
works of John Maynard Keynes is known as
Keynesian economics.
8 of 41
Classical versus Keynesian Macroeconomics
9 of 41
FOR INQUIRING MINDS
10 of 41
FOR INQUIRING MINDS
11 of 41
Policy to Fight Recessions
The main practical consequence of Keynes’s work
was that it legitimized macroeconomic policy
activism—the use of monetary and fiscal policy to
smooth out the business cycle.
12 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The End of the Great Depression
The basic message many of the young economists who
adopted Keynes’s ideas in the 1930s took from his work was
that economic recovery requires aggressive fiscal expansion
—deficit spending on a large scale to create jobs.
And that is what they eventually got, but it wasn’t because
politicians were persuaded.
Instead, what happened was a very large and expensive
war, World War II.
13 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
Fiscal Policy and the End of the Great Depression
14 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The End of the Great Depression
Figure 33-3 shows the U.S. unemployment rate and the
federal budget deficit as a share of GDP from 1930 to 1947.
As you can see, deficit spending during the 1930s was on a
modest scale.
In 1940, as the risk of war grew larger, the United States
began a large military buildup, and the budget moved deep
into deficit.
After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the
country began deficit spending on an enormous scale.
15 of 41
Challenges to Keynesian Economics
Monetarism asserted that GDP will grow steadily if
the money supply grows steadily.
It called for a shift from monetary policy rule to that
of a discretionary monetary policy.
It argued that GDP would grow steadily if the
money supply grew steadily.
Monetarism was influential for a time, but was
eventually rejected by many macroeconomists.
16 of 41
Fiscal Policy with a Fixed Money Supply
17 of 41
Monetarism
Milton Friedman (July 31, 1912 – November 16,
2006) ,1976 Nobel laureates in Economics .
When the central bank changes interest rates or
the money supply based on its assessment of the
state of the economy, it is engaged in
discretionary monetary policy.
A monetary policy rule is a formula that
determines the central bank’s actions.
The velocity of money is the ratio of nominal GDP
to the money supply.
The velocity equation: M × V = P × Y
18 of 41
Monetarism
Monetarists believed that V was stable, so they
believed that if the Federal Reserve kept M on a
steady growth path, nominal GDP would also grow
steadily.
Rule rather than discretionary.
19 of 41
Inflation and the Natural Rate of Unemployment
20 of 41
Inflation and the Natural Rate of Unemployment
21 of 41
The Political Business Cycle
22 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The Fed’s Flirtation with Monetarism
In the late 1970s, the Fed adopted a monetary policy rule,
began announcing target ranges for several measures of
the money supply, and stopped setting targets for interest
rates.
Most people interpreted these changes as a strong move
toward monetarism.
In 1982, however, the Fed turned its back on monetarism.
Since 1982 the Fed has pursued a discretionary monetary
policy, which has led to large swings in the money supply.
Why did the Fed flirt with monetarism, then abandon it?
23 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The Fed’s Flirtation with Monetarism
The turn to monetarism largely reflected the events of the
1970s, when a sharp rise in inflation broke the perceived
trade-off between inflation and unemployment and
discredited traditional Keynesianism.
The turn away from monetarism also reflected events: as
shown Figure 33-5, the velocity of money, which had
followed a smooth trend before 1980, became erratic after
1980.
This made monetarism seem like less of a good idea.
24 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The Velocity of Money
25 of 41
Rational Expectations, Real Business Cycles, and
New Classical Macroeconomics
New classical macroeconomics is an approach
to the business cycle.
New classical macroeconomics emerged as a
school in macroeconomics during the 1970s.
The most famous New Classical model is that of
Real Business Cycles, developed by Robert Lucas,
Jr.,Finn E. Kydland, and Edward C. Prescott,
building upon the ideas of, among others, John
Muth.
It returns to the classical view that shifts in the
aggregate demand curve affect only the aggregate
price level, not the aggregate output.
26 of 41
Rational Expectations
Rational expectations is the view that individuals
and firms make decisions optimally, using all
available information.
This way of modeling expectations was originally
proposed by John F. Muth (1961).
The idea of rational expectations did serve as a
useful caution for macroeconomists who had
become excessively optimistic about their ability to
manage the economy.
27 of 41
Real Business Cycles
According to new Keynesian economics, market
imperfections can lead to price stickiness for the
economy as a whole.
New Keynesian macroeconomic analysis usually
assumes that households and firms have rational
New Keynesian analysis usually assumes a
variety of market failures. New Keynesians
assume prices and wages are sticky which means
they do not adjust instantaneously to changes in
economic conditions.
Real business cycle theory says that
fluctuations in the rate of growth of total factor
productivity cause the business cycle. 28 of 41
FOR INQUIRING MINDS
Supply-Side Economics
During the 1970s a group of economic writers began
propounding a view of economic policy that came to be
known as “supply-side economics.”
The core of this view was the belief that reducing tax rates,
and so increasing the incentives to work and invest, would
have a powerful positive effect on the growth rate of
potential output.
The main reason for this dismissal is lack of evidence.
Almost all economists agree that tax cuts increase
incentives to work and invest, but attempts to estimate these
incentive effects indicate that at current U.S. tax levels they
aren’t nearly strong enough to support the strong claims
made by supply-siders.
29 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
The term "supply side" economics was first used by
Herbert Stein, a former economic adviser to
President Nixon, in 1976.
Typical policy recommendations of supply-side
economics are lower marginal tax rates and less
regulation.
30 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
Total Factor Productivity and the Business Cycle
Real business cycle theory argues that fluctuations in the rate
of growth of total factor productivity are the principal cause of
business cycles.
In the early days of real business cycle theory, proponents
argued that productivity fluctuations are entirely the result of
uneven technological progress. Critics pointed out, however,
that in really severe recessions, total factor productivity
actually declines.
Some economists argue that declining total factor productivity
during recessions is a result, not a cause, of economic
downturns. It’s now widely accepted that some of the
correlation between total factor productivity and the business
cycle is the result of the effect of the business cycle on
productivity, rather than the reverse.
31 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
Total Factor Productivity and the Business Cycle
32 of 41
Five Key Questions About Macroeconomic Policy
33 of 41
Current Debate
There are continuing debates about the appropriate
role of monetary policy.
Some economists advocate explicit inflation
targets, but others oppose them.
Inflation targeting requires that the central bank try to
keep the inflation rate near a predetermined target rate.
Economists debate about whether monetary policy
should take steps to manage asset prices.
Economists debate about what kind of
unconventional monetary policy, if any, should be
adopted to address a liquidity trap.
34 of 41
The Clean Little Secret of Macroeconomics
The clean little secret of modern macroeconomics
is how much consensus economists have reached
over the past 70 years.
35 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
After the Bubble
During the 1990s, many economists worried that stock
prices were irrationally high, and these worries proved
justified.
In 2001 the plunge in stock prices helped push the United
States into recession.
The Fed responded with large, rapid interest rate cuts. But
should it have tried to burst the stock bubble when it was
happening?
Although the economy began recovering in late 2001, the
recovery was initially weak. Also the Fed had to cut the
federal funds rate to only 1%—uncomfortably close to 0%.
36 of 41
►ECONOMICS IN ACTION
After the Bubble
In other words, the events of 2001–2003 probably
intensified the debate over monetary policy and asset
prices, rather than resolving it.
The bursting of the housing bubble after 2006 offered
another test. The case of the housing bubble also
highlighted the problem of identifying bubbles as they
inflate.
In late 2004, Alan Greenspan, then Fed Chairman,
pronounced a “severe distortion” in housing prices “most
unlikely.” It seems safe to predict that, in the future, the Fed
will be more inclined to take asset prices into account when
setting monetary policy.
37 of 41
SUMMARY
38 of 41
SUMMARY
40 of 41
SUMMARY
41 of 41
The End of Chapter 33
coming attraction:
Chapter 34:
Open-Economy Macroeconomics
42 of 41