This document discusses curriculum planning and development across multiple levels and sectors. It describes how curriculum planning can take place at the classroom, team/grade, school, district, and state levels, with each level exercising authority over those below. It also outlines some common decisions that are made during curriculum planning, such as course requirements, diversity inclusion, and critical thinking. Models for curriculum development are also presented, including deductive, inductive, linear, and non-linear models.
This document discusses curriculum planning and development across multiple levels and sectors. It describes how curriculum planning can take place at the classroom, team/grade, school, district, and state levels, with each level exercising authority over those below. It also outlines some common decisions that are made during curriculum planning, such as course requirements, diversity inclusion, and critical thinking. Models for curriculum development are also presented, including deductive, inductive, linear, and non-linear models.
This document discusses curriculum planning and development across multiple levels and sectors. It describes how curriculum planning can take place at the classroom, team/grade, school, district, and state levels, with each level exercising authority over those below. It also outlines some common decisions that are made during curriculum planning, such as course requirements, diversity inclusion, and critical thinking. Models for curriculum development are also presented, including deductive, inductive, linear, and non-linear models.
This document discusses curriculum planning and development across multiple levels and sectors. It describes how curriculum planning can take place at the classroom, team/grade, school, district, and state levels, with each level exercising authority over those below. It also outlines some common decisions that are made during curriculum planning, such as course requirements, diversity inclusion, and critical thinking. Models for curriculum development are also presented, including deductive, inductive, linear, and non-linear models.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23
Chapter 2
Curriculum Planning: A Multi-level,
Multi-sector Process • Curriculum development is a collaborative effort. • Planning can take place on five levels: classroom, team/grade/department, individual school, school district, and state. • From the state to the classroom, each level exercise authority over levels below it. • Teachers and curriculum specialist find opportunities to participate actively in curriculum development at the first four levels. • Some curriculum workers are asked by the state to serve on curriculum projects. Decisions -Curriculum (Planning) • 1. Course requirements (ie technology credit) • 2. Interdisciplinary • 3. Bringing diversity into the classroom • 4. Character education/sex education • 5. Critical thinking • 6. Bilingual education • Reading • Gifted/Talented Five Levels of Curriculum • 1st level: Classroom – Goals/objectives – Select subject matter – Select materials – Identify resources • 2nd Level: Team (Grade/Dept.) – Cooperative planning – Determine Content – Sequencing of subject matter • 3rd Level: School Level – Curriculum deficiencies – Planning for accreditation – Choosing textbooks – Library/Learning centers – Compliance with the state & federal mandates – Reducing absenteeism • 4th Level: School District Level – Adding new program/deleting programs – Reviewing achievements – Writing/Reviewing grants – Evaluating and articulating programs • 5th Level: State Level – Responsibility of curriculum – Provides leadership to schools – Interprets, enforces and monitor legislated regulations – Disburses monies – Accredits and monitors – Standards for graduation `` – Participation on the regional, national and international level sectors is usually a voluntary activity Chapter 4
Curriculum Planning: The Human
Dimension • There are various roles played by persons and groups involved in curriculum development at an individual school. • Principals that perceive themselves as instructional leaders take an active part in curriculum development. Others may delegate the responsibility of curriculum development. • Students, parents, and other community persons may participate in curriculum improvement by providing data about their own learning, serving on committees, answering surveys, and serving as resource persons. • Teachers and specialist share the greatest responsibility for curriculum development Part of Curriculum • Principal • Curriculum leader • Teacher • Students • Parents/citizens The Curriculum Coordinator Must: • Possess a good general education • Have a good knowledge of both general and specific curricula • Be knowledgeable about resources for curriculum development • Be skilled in research and knowledgeable about locating pertinent research studies • Be knowledgeable about the needs of learners, the community, and the society • Be a bit of a philosopher, sociologist, and psychologist • Know and appreciate the individual characteristics of participating colleagues Chapter 5
Models for Curriculum Development
• There are various models of curriculum development. • Four models are presented • Models can be in the forms of lists, diagrams, linear, deductive, inductive, prescriptive, and descriptive • Curriculum developers should become familiar with the various models and – Develop one that is understandable and suitable for the school they are working with. Curriculum Models • All meet the criteria for curriculum model; one cannot be considered better than the others • “Deductive” - starting with generalization and leading to actual development • “Inductive” - is starting with actual development and leading to generalization • “Linear” - propose a certain order or sequence of progression through the various steps • “Non-linear” - permit planners to enter at various points, skip components, reverse the order, work on two more components at the same time • “Prescriptive” - what ought to be done • “Descriptive” - platform, deliberation and design