Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 107 views

    Auto Cutter Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Radwan Rahat
    This document analyzes the capacity and efficiency of an auto cutter machine. It finds that the actual possible efficiency of 77% is lower than the theoretical efficiency of 85% due to 150 minutes spent on marker setup and positioning. It also compares the theoretical production plan to the actual production and finds a discrepancy, demonstrating the need to manually calculate efficiency.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Auto Cutter Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Radwan Rahat
    107 views11 pages
    This document analyzes the capacity and efficiency of an auto cutter machine. It finds that the actual possible efficiency of 77% is lower than the theoretical efficiency of 85% due to 150 minutes spent on marker setup and positioning. It also compares the theoretical production plan to the actual production and finds a discrepancy, demonstrating the need to manually calculate efficiency.

    Original Title

    Auto Cutter Analysis (003)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document analyzes the capacity and efficiency of an auto cutter machine. It finds that the actual possible efficiency of 77% is lower than the theoretical efficiency of 85% due to 150 minutes spent on marker setup and positioning. It also compares the theoretical production plan to the actual production and finds a discrepancy, demonstrating the need to manually calculate efficiency.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    107 views11 pages

    Auto Cutter Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Radwan Rahat
    This document analyzes the capacity and efficiency of an auto cutter machine. It finds that the actual possible efficiency of 77% is lower than the theoretical efficiency of 85% due to 150 minutes spent on marker setup and positioning. It also compares the theoretical production plan to the actual production and finds a discrepancy, demonstrating the need to manually calculate efficiency.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 11

    Analysis about Auto Cutter Machine

    Auto Cutter Cutting


    Analysis
    Available Minute & Machine Capacity
    Working Hour 11 Hour
    Available Minute 660 Min
    Plan Efficiency 85%
    At 85 % Efficiency, Available =660X 85%
    Minute =561 min
    Cutting SMV Per Perimeter 0.2
    11 H Machine Cutting Capacity =561 / 0.2
    =2805 Perimeter
    Actual Data
    Total Marker Cut 36 Piece
    Per Marker Positioning Time 2 Min
    Marker With Block 12 Piece
    Per Marker Block Black Time 6.5 Min
    Per Perimeter Cutting SMV 0.2

    Required Set up Time


    Marker Set=(36 X 2)=72 Min
    Block Back Time=(6.5X12)=78 Min

    ***Total Setup Time=(72+78)=150 Min


    Actual Possible Plan Efficiency

    Available Hour 11
    Available Min 660 min
    Positioning Time 150 min
    Actual Available Time 510 Min
    Actual Possible Plan Efficiency 510/660 %
    = 77 %
    Actual Capacity =510/0.2
    =2560 Perimeter
    Theoretical Plan VS Actual Plan

    Theoretical Plan Actual Plan


    Software Generate VS Manually Calculated Efficiency
    Date: 31st July-2019

    Software Generate Efficiency


    Manually Calculated Efficiency

    Plan Achievement
     Plan Marker cut= 38 Piece  Marker Cut=34 Piece
     Plan Block Marker cut= 5  Cut Perimeter=2446.92
     Set Up Time=(30 X1.6)+ (5X6.5)=92.5
    Min
     Plan Perimeter=(660-92.5)/.2
    =2837.5 Perimeter

    Efficiency= 2446.92/2837.5= 86%


    Reason For Efficiency Less
    10th Jan VS 22 Aug
    10 January
    th 22nd August
    Reason for Efficiency Less

     More Marker
     Short Quantity
     More PO
     Less Marker Length
     More Notch
    Corrective Action Plan For Increasing Efficiency

     Working with CAD Department to reduce Block Back Time

    Questions??
    Matrix From Machine Company

    You might also like