Strategies For Competing in International Markets
Strategies For Competing in International Markets
Strategies For Competing in International Markets
STRATEGIES FOR
COMPETING IN
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
THIS CHAPTER WILL HELP YOU UNDERSTAND:
LO 1 The primary reasons companies choose
to compete in international markets.
LO 2 How and why differing market conditions across countries
influence a company’s strategy choices in international
markets.
LO 3 The five major strategic options for entering foreign markets.
LO 4 The three main strategic approaches for competing
internationally.
WHY COMPANIES DECIDE TO
ENTER FOREIGN MARKETS
♦ Positives ♦ Negatives
● Tax incentives ● Environmental regulations
● Low tax rates ● Subsidies and loans to
● Low-cost loans domestic competitors
● Site location and ● Import restrictions
development ● Tariffs and quotas
● Worker training ● Local-content requirements
● Regulatory approvals
● Profit repatriation limits
● Minority ownership limits
CORE CONCEPT
♦ Advantages ♦ Disadvantages
● Low resource ● Maintaining control of
requirements proprietary know-how
● Income from ● Loss of operational
royalties and and quality control
franchising fees ● Adapting to local
● Rapid expansion market tastes and
into many markets expectations
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY STRATEGIES
♦ Advantages ♦ Disadvantages
● High level of control ● Costs of acquisition
● Quick large-scale ● Complexity of acquisition
market entry process
● Avoids entry barriers ● Integration of the firms’
● Access to acquired structures, cultures,
firm’s skills operations and personnel
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY STRATEGIES
A greenfield venture is a subsidiary business
that is established by setting up the entire
operation from the ground up.
A greenfield strategy is appealing when:
● Creating an internal startup is cheaper than making
an acquisition.
● Adding new production capacity will not adversely
impact the supply–demand balance in the local market.
● A startup subsidiary has the ability to gain good
distribution access.
● A startup subsidiary will have the size, cost structure,
and resource strengths to compete head-to-head
against local rivals.
GREENFIELD STRATEGIES
♦ Advantages ♦ Disadvantages
● High level of control ● Capital costs of initial
over venture development
● “Learning by doing” ● Risks of loss due to
in the local market political instability or lack of
● Direct transfer of the legal protection of
firm’s technology, ownership
skills, business ● Slowest form of entry due
practices, and culture to extended time required
to construct facility
BENEFITS OF ALLIANCE AND
JOINT VENTURE STRATEGIES
Collaborative strategies involving alliances or joint ventures
with foreign partners are a popular way for companies to
edge their way into the markets of foreign countries.
Gaining partner’s knowledge of local market conditions
Achieving economies of scale through joint operations
Gaining technical expertise and local market knowledge
Sharing distribution facilities and dealer networks, and
mutually strengthening each partner’s access to buyers.
Directing competitive energies more toward mutual rivals and
less toward one another
Establishing working relationships with key officials in the
host-country government
THE RISKS OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES WITH
FOREIGN PARTNERS
Competing
Internationally
Multidomestic Approach
(think local, act local)
Advantages Disadvantages
• Can meet the specific needs of • Hinders resource and capability
each market more precisely sharing or cross-market transfers
• Can respond more swiftly to • Higher production and distribution
localized changes in demand costs
• Can target reactions to the • Not conducive to a worldwide
moves of local rivals competitive advantage
• Can respond more quickly to
local opportunities and threats
TABLE 7.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Multidomestic,
Global, and Transnational Approaches (cont’d)
Transnational Approach
(think global, act local)
Advantages Disadvantages
• Offers the benefits of both local • More complex and harder to
responsiveness and global implement
integration • Conflicting goals may be difficult to
• Enables the transfer and reconcile and require trade-offs
sharing of resources and • Implementation more costly and
capabilities across borders time-consuming
• Provides the benefits of flexible
coordination
TABLE 7.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Multidomestic,
Global, and Transnational Approaches (cont’d)
Global Approach
(think global, act global)
Advantages Disadvantages
• Lower costs due to scale and • Cannot to address local needs
scope economies precisely
• Greater efficiencies due to the • Less responsive to changes in
ability to transfer best practices local market conditions
across markets • Higher transportation costs and
• More innovation from tariffs
knowledge sharing and • Higher coordination and integration
capability transfer costs
• The benefit of a global brand
and reputation