Strategic MGMT Ch-3
Strategic MGMT Ch-3
Strategic MGMT Ch-3
Ch 3 -1
Ch 13 -2
External Strategic Management Audit
Ch 3 -3
Key External Forces & the Organization
Competitors
Suppliers
Distributors
Creditors
Key Customers
Communities Opportunities
External
Managers &
Forces
Stockholders Threats
Labor Unions
Special Interest Groups
Products
Services
Ch 3 -4
Performing External Audit
Long-term orientation
Measurable
External
Factors Applicable to
competing firms
Hierarchical
Ch 3 -5
I/O Perspective Firm Performance
Industry Properties
Economies of Scale
Product differentiation
Level of competitiveness
Ch 3 -6
Economic forces
Ch 3 -7
Social, Cultural, Demographic & Environmental
Forces
childbearing rates,
number of special-interest groups,
number of marriages,
number of divorces,
number of births,
number of deaths,
immigration and emigration rates,
social security programs,
life expectancy rates,
per capita income,
location of retailing, manufacturing, and service
business.
Ch 3 -8
Political, Government & Legal Forces
Ch 3 -9
Technological Forces
Ch 3 -10
Competitive Forces
•Strengths
•Weaknesses
•Capabilities
•Opportunities
•Threats
•Objectives
•Strategies
Ch 3 -11
Competitive Forces
Ch 3 -12
The Five-Forces Model of Competition
Potential development
of substitute products
Ch 3 -13
Rivalry Among Competing Firms
Ch 3 -14
The intensity of rivalry among competing firms tends to
increase
Ch 3 -15
Potential Entry of New Competitors
Ch 3 -16
Potential Development of Substitute Products
Ch 3 -17
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Ch 3 -18
• It is often in the best interest of both suppliers and
producers to assist each other with reasonable prices,
improved quality, development of new services, just-
in-time deliveries, and reduced inventory costs, thus
enhancing long-term profitability for all concerned.
Ch 3 -19
Bargaining Power of Consumers
Ch 3 -20
Industry Analysis: The External Factor Evaluation
(EFE) Matrix
Ch 3 -21
EFE matrix can be developed in five steps:
Ch 3 -22
• Assign a rating between 1 and 4 to each key external
factor to indicate how effectively the firm’s current
strategies respond to the factor, where 4=the response
is superior, 3=the response is above average, 2=the
response is average, and 1=the response is poor.
Ratings are based on effectiveness of the firm’s
strategies. Ratings are thus company-based, whereas
the weights in step 2 are industry based.
Ch 3 -23
• Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a
weighted score.
• Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the
total weighted score for the organization.
Ch 3 -24
Ch 3 -25
Ch 3 -26
Industry Analysis EFE
Ch 3 -27
Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
Ch 3 -28
Gateway Apple Dell
Ch 3 -29
Gateway Apple Dell
Ch 3 -30