The document discusses several techniques for critically reading texts, including:
1. Keeping a reading journal to record personal reactions and connect ideas to experiences.
2. Annotating texts by underlining important passages and writing notes, comments and questions.
3. Outlining texts to understand how claims are structured and connected.
4. Summarizing texts to differentiate major from minor points.
It also discusses evaluating claims, understanding context, intertextuality, and hypertext as ways readers can engage more critically with information. The goal is for readers to thoughtfully process an author's message rather than just passively understand texts.
The document discusses several techniques for critically reading texts, including:
1. Keeping a reading journal to record personal reactions and connect ideas to experiences.
2. Annotating texts by underlining important passages and writing notes, comments and questions.
3. Outlining texts to understand how claims are structured and connected.
4. Summarizing texts to differentiate major from minor points.
It also discusses evaluating claims, understanding context, intertextuality, and hypertext as ways readers can engage more critically with information. The goal is for readers to thoughtfully process an author's message rather than just passively understand texts.
The document discusses several techniques for critically reading texts, including:
1. Keeping a reading journal to record personal reactions and connect ideas to experiences.
2. Annotating texts by underlining important passages and writing notes, comments and questions.
3. Outlining texts to understand how claims are structured and connected.
4. Summarizing texts to differentiate major from minor points.
It also discusses evaluating claims, understanding context, intertextuality, and hypertext as ways readers can engage more critically with information. The goal is for readers to thoughtfully process an author's message rather than just passively understand texts.
The document discusses several techniques for critically reading texts, including:
1. Keeping a reading journal to record personal reactions and connect ideas to experiences.
2. Annotating texts by underlining important passages and writing notes, comments and questions.
3. Outlining texts to understand how claims are structured and connected.
4. Summarizing texts to differentiate major from minor points.
It also discusses evaluating claims, understanding context, intertextuality, and hypertext as ways readers can engage more critically with information. The goal is for readers to thoughtfully process an author's message rather than just passively understand texts.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 43
Whenever you read something and you evaluate claims,
seek definitions, judge information, demand proof, and
question assumptions, you are thinking critically. This type of reading goes beyond passively understanding a text, because you process the author’s words and make judgments after carefully considering the reading’s message. A reading journal is similar to keeping a diary except you are writing your feelings and ideas in reaction to your reading assignments. This process allows you to develop your impressions of the text and connect them to your personal experiences. This allows your to better relate to the essay and understand the author’s ideas. Annotating the text simply means making notes on your copy of the reading. This includes highlighting or underlining important passages and writing notes, comments, questions, and reactions on the margins.
By doing this, your are entering into a dialogue with the
author and not just passively reading the text. Creating a rough outline of the text will also be helpful in getting to understand it more critically. By locating the thesis statement, claims, and evidence, and then plotting these into an outline, you can see how the writer structures, sequences, and connects his or her ideas. This way you will be able to better evaluate the quality of the writing. Summarizing the text is similar to outlining, in that you need to get the gist.
A summary consists of getting the main
points of the essay and important supporting details. Summarizing is a useful skill because you can better understand the reading if you can recognize and differentiate major and minor points in the text. Questioning the text involves asking specific questions on points that your are skeptical about. These may be topics that do not meet your expectations or agree with your personal views. Determining Explicit and Implicit Information Critical reading also means that you are able to distinguish the information that is clearly stated (explicit) in the text from ideas that are suggested (implicit). This will help you make inferences about what you read. Defining Claims The claim is the most important part of the text. The quality and complexity of the reading depend on the claim, because the claim defines the paper’s direction and scope. The claim is a sentence that summarizes the most important thing that the writer wants to say as a result of his/her thinking, reading, or writing. 1.A claim should be argumentative and debatable. 2.A claim should be specific and focused. 3.A claim should be interesting and engaging. 4.A claim should be logical. Distinguishing Between the Types of Claim First, claims of fact state a quantifiable assertion, or a measurable topic. They assert that something has existed, exist, or will exist based on data. They rely on reliable sources or systematic procedures to be validated; this is what makes them different from inferences. Next, claims of value assert something that can be qualified. They consist of arguments about moral, philosophical, or aesthetic topic. These types of topics try to prove that some values are more or less desirable compared to others. They make judgments, based on certain standards, on whether something is right or wrong, good or bad, or something similar. Finally, claims of policy posit that specific actions should be chosen as solutions to a particular problem. Being a critical reader also involves understanding that texts are always developed with a certain context. A text is neither written nor read in a vacuum; its meaning and interpretation are affected by a given set of circumstances. Thus, context is defined as the social, cultural, political, historical, and other related circumstances that surround the text and form the terms from which it can be better understood and evaluated.
When was the work written?
What were the circumstances that produced it? Another important technique in analyzing the context of a text’s development is defining its intertextual link to another text. Intertextuality is the modeling of a text’s meaning by another text. It is defined as the connections between language, genre, or discourse. This is seen when an author borrows and transforms a prior text, or when you read one text and you reference another. This view recognizes that the text is always influenced by previous texts and in turn anticipates future texts. A text contains many layers of accumulated cultural, historical, and social knowledge, which continually adds to and affects one another. Thus, intertextuality becomes a dialogue among different texts and interpretation of the writer, the audience, and the current and earlier cultural contexts. Take, for intake, the local legend of folk hero Bernardo Carpio. Many versions of his tale exist, but local folklore says he is a giant who is the cause of earthquake. In Greek mythology, there is also Poseidon, who is the god of sea and earthquakes. Many cultures also attribute natural disasters to legendary figures. This is an example intertextuality. Meanwhile, hypertext is a relatively new way of reading a text online. Traditionally, reading was viewed as a linear process, where you read from the beginning until the end. However, the advent of the Internet and technology has created new ways of reading and processing a text, which includes hypertext. , therefore, is a nonlinear way of showing information.
connects topics on a screen
to related information, graphics, videos, and music---information is not simply related to text. This information appears as links and is usually accessed by clicking. The reader can jump to more information about a topic, which in turn may have more links. A reader can skim through sections of a text, freely jumping from one part to another depending on what aspect of the text interests him/her. Thus, in reading with hypertext, you are given more flexibility and personalization because you get to select the order in which you read the text and focus on information that is relevant to your background and interest. Therefore, you create your own meaning out of the material. For example, you are doing research about the Philippine eagle. A quick Google search would lead you to a Wikipedia article on it. Information on it would include a picture and a brief, written description. While reading about the Philippine eagle, you will also encounter links to its conversation status. This may lead you to more information about conversation effort. However, if you were interested in the appearance of the Philippine physical description and even give you links to pictures and videos of the Philippine eagle. Thus, depending on your purpose and interests, the article on the Philippine eagle could lead you to a variety of different, detailed paths. Becoming a good critical reader means that you are able to logically evaluate the claims of the writer. Any writer would want the reader---and possibly agree with---the claims that he or she puts forward. In expository writing, assertions become the primary channel for a reader to assent to a claim. Assertions are declarative sentences that claim something is true about something else. Simply put, it is a sentence that is either true or false. The sampaguita’s roots are used for medicinal purposes, such as an anesthetic and a sedative.
The sampaguita belong to the genus
Jasminum of the family Oleaceae. The popularity of sampaguita flowers is most evident in places of worship.
Sampaguitas are the most beautiful
and most fragrant of all flowers. A. The first type of assertion is a This is a statement that can be proven objectively by direct experience, testimonies of witnesses, verified observations, or the results of research. B. The second type is an A convention is a way in which something is done, similar to traditions and norms. C. The third type of assertion is an . Opinions are based on facts, but are difficult to objectively verify because of the uncertainty of producing satisfactory proofs of soundness. C. Opinions result from ambiguities; the more ambiguous a statement, the more difficult it is to verify. Thus, they are open to disputes. The popularity of sampaguita flowers is most evident in places of worship.
The above statement is an opinion because it is based on an observation
that need to be proven by studies and repeated observations; there are too many factors involved that makes explicit judgement difficult.