PP Ch01
PP Ch01
PP Ch01
PowerPoint Slides by
R. Dennis Middlemist
Colorado State University
An Introduction to
Corporate Strategy
PowerPoint Slides by
R. Dennis Middlemist
Colorado State University
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Need for Corporate Strategy
Many major companies experienced slow
or negative growth in late 1990s
These companies replaced their CEOs
Ineffective corporate strategies played a
major role in these misfortunes
1-3 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Need for Corporate Strategy
The pressure to change
Corporate governance scandals
Financial capitalists
Pressure for shareholder value
Corporate takeover
Leveraged buyout
Franchising
1-4 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
What Is Corporate Strategy?
1-5 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Adapted from: Figure 1.1: Corporate Strategy Triangle
Foundations
VISION
of Corporate
GOALS Strategy
& OBJECTIVES
ORGANIZATION
CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
1-6 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Vision
Successful corporations have one
Ambitious aspiration
Defined domain (boundaries of the firm)
Ethical values
1-7 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Goals & Objectives
Specific short- and medium-term quantitative
targets (objectives)
Qualitative intentions (goals)
1-8 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Resources
Assets, skills, and capabilities of the firm
Critical building blocks of strategy
Determine what a firm can do
Determine competitive advantage at the
business unit level
Determine range of market opportunities
Ultimate source of value creation both within
and across businesses
1-9 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Businesses
The industries in which a firm operates, and
the competitive strategy it adopts in each
Industry choice is critical to the long-term
success of a corporate strategy
Best predictor of firm performance is the
profitability of the industries in which it
competes
1-10 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Businesses
A firm’s competitive strategy within each
industry affects corporate performance
Superior returns, in the long run, are created
only by effective strategies that create
competitive advantages
1-11 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Structure, Systems, & Processes
Structure
Division of a corporation into discrete units
Formal organization chart shows allocation of
authority inside the corporate hierarchy
1-12 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Structure, Systems, & Processes
Systems
Formal policies and routines
Rules that define how tasks are to be fulfilled
1-13 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Structure, Systems, & Processes
Processes
Informal elements of an organization’s activities
A firm’s internal design should flow from its
strategy and be customized to fit its resources
and businesses
1-14 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Structure, Systems, & Processes
No one optimal set of structures, systems,
and processes for all firms
Firm’s internal design should flow from its
strategy and be customized to fit the
resources and businesses of the particular
firm
Inappropriate design often causes failure of
otherwise well-constructed corporate
strategies
1-15 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Corporate Advantage
An effective corporate strategy results CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
1-16 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Corporate Advantage
Most corporate advantages are CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
1-17 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Framework for Corporate Strategy
Corporate Advantage
Three questions can be applied to every CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
High
3 1.0 0.33
Relative market share
Adapted from Figure A.2: Growth Share Matrix was Used to Map Businesses
1-19 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Portfolio Planning:
Growth Share Matrix
High
3 1.0 0.33
Relative market share
Adapted from Figure A.3: Classic Growth Share Matrix (General Foods Corporation, 1980–1982)
1-20 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Value-Based Strategy
Current
market
value
Curent Maximum
perceptions raider
gap opportunity
Company Optimal
value restructured
as is Restructuring value
Framework
Strategic and Total
operating company
opportunities opportunities
1-21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Four Types of Corporate Strategies
1-22 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Resource-Based View
Core competency
Capability or skill
Thread running through a firm’s businesses
units
Weaves units together into a coherent whole
1-23 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Financial Economics View
Performance implications of diversification
Capital market test to the value of
diversification
20% diversification discount
Compares the actual stock market
capitalization of a multibusiness corporation to
the sum of the imputed value of its business
segments
For some firms, the whole is worth more than
the sum of the parts
1-24 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.