Module 4: Evaluating Nutrition Care Plans: Nutrition For Children With Special Health Care Needs

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 38

Nutrition for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Module 4: Evaluating Nutrition


Care Plans
Pacific West MCH
Distance-Learning Curricula
 Nutrition for Children with Special Health
Care Needs - 6 self-study modules
 Nutrition for Children with Special Health
Care Needs - 4 group study modules
(this presentation is one of them)
 Nutrition and Oral Health Curriculum
all available (free) on-line at
www.pacificwestmch.org
Group Study Curriculum
Module 1: Providing Family-Centered Care
Module 2: Participating in the
Interdisciplinary Approach to
Feeding Interventions
Module 3: State and Local Nutrition
Resources
Module 4: Improving Nutrition Interventions
Module 4:
Evaluating Nutrition Care Plans
Activities:
 Video example of interdisciplinary intervention
 Review process of nutrition assessment and
intervention planning
 Evaluate appropriate intervention plans and
outcome measures
 Discussion regarding follow up and measurement
of intervention outcomes
Learning Objectives
After completing the module, participants
will have the knowledge and skills to:
 Critically evaluate the development of
nutrition interventions
 Develop alternative strategies for weak
nutrition intervention plans
 Determine appropriate mechanisms for
nutrition follow-up
The Process of Developing a
Nutrition Care Plan
 Decide on Nutrition Outcomes
(assessment to identify problems)
 Develop Nutrition Interventions
(to address identified problems)
 Determine Outcome Measures
(appropriate to specific interventions)
The Process
 Screening
 Assessment
 Anthropometrics
 Biochemical
 Clinical/Medical
 Dietary/Feeding
 Intervention
 Evaluation
The Process: How does the condition
affect:
Assessment •Growth potential?
•Body composition
 Anthropometrics
•Risk of over/under- weight
 Biochemical
Are the effects on growth
 Clinical/Medical nutrition-related or non-
nutritional?
 Dietary/Feeding
Do any medications have
the potential to affect
growth? Weight gain?
The Process:
Assessment Does the condition affect
biochemical markers?
 Anthropometrics
Do medications affect
 Biochemical biochemical markers?
 Clinical/Medical Does the condition require
 Dietary/Feeding special biochemical
monitoring?
The Process:
Assessment
 Anthropometrics Are there any secondary
 Biochemical conditions that might affect
nutritional status (e.g.,
 Clinical/Medical constipation,
malabsorption)?
 Dietary/Feeding
The Process:
Assessment Does the condition affect
nutrient needs?
 Anthropometrics (Energy, other macronutrients;
 Biochemical vitamins, minerals; fluid)

 Clinical/Medical Does the condition affect


ability to eat?
 Dietary/Feeding (Positioning, oral-motor skills,
coordination, need for different
portion size, acceptance of food,
meal duration, social interaction)
The Process:

Intervention = ACTION = What will be done differently?


Individualized
Specific
Outcome-based
Family centered

Example: Family will offer energy-dense foods at meal and


snack times
Interventions
Effective interventions specify:
 What will be done
 How it will be carried out
 Who will do it
 When it will happen
 Where it will happen (when appropriate)

Family will offer 2 foods with crunchy textures at each meal


Evaluation
Outcome = RESULTS = What will happen as a result of the
intervention?
Measurable
Specific
Evaluated

Example: Weight-for-age between the 10th and 50th


percentiles
Evaluation
Outcome = RESULTS = What will happen as a result of
the intervention?
 Long-term (adequate calcium intake)
 Short-term (re-gain of weight lost during an acute
illness)
Examples
Sheldon
Sheldon is a 9-month old with Prader-Willi
syndrome.
Assessment identifies that:
 Wt/age, length/age, weight/length are <5th %ile
 Wt/age was ~10th %ile until 6 weeks ago, when
he was ill
GOAL (desired outcome):
 Sheldon’s weight-for-age will increase.
Sheldon
Sheldon is a 9-month old with Prader-Willi
syndrome.

IMPROVED GOAL:

Sheldon’s weight-for-length will increase


to 5-10th percentile in 6 weeks.
Sheldon
GOAL: Sheldon’s weight-for-length will increase
to 5-10th percentile in 6 weeks.

INTERVENTION (action):
 Sheldon’s family will offer infant formula that
is concentrated.
Sheldon
GOAL: Sheldon’s weight-for-length will increase
to 5-10th percentile in 6 weeks.

IMPROVED INTERVENTION:
 Sheldon’s family will offer infant formula that
is concentrated to provide 24 kcal/oz.
Sheldon’s family will receive a written recipe
for this special formula.
Carla: Desired outcomes
Carla is a 2-year old with cerebral palsy
Assessment indicates that:
- Oral-motor delays interfere with eating
- Weight gain has slowed over past few months
- Labs indicate that she is malnourished

 Carla will be well-nourished


 Carla’s feeding problems
will be addressed
Carla: Measurable Outcomes
Carla is a 2-year old with cerebral palsy
–Oral-motor delays interfere with eating
–Weight gain has slowed over past few months
–Labs indicate that she is malnourished

 Carla will be well-  Carla’s prealbumin will be in


nourished the normal range in 6 weeks
 Carla’s feeding  Carla’s weight-for-length will
problems will be be >10th percentile in 6
addressed months
Carla: Measurable Outcomes
Carla is a 2-year old with cerebral palsy
–Oral-motor delays interfere with eating
–Weight gain has slowed over past few months
–Labs indicate that she is malnourished

 Carla will be well-


nourished
 Carla’s feeding  Carla will be referred
problems will be to a feeding therapist
addressed by her next clinic visit
Carla: Designing Interventions
Outcomes:
 prealbumin will be in the normal range in 6 weeks
 weight-for-length will be >10th percentile in 6 months
 Referral to feeding therapist by next clinic visit

Interventions: need to be designed to achieve the


measurable outcome
Carla: Specific Interventions
Outcomes:
 prealbumin will be in the normal range in 6 weeks
 weight-for-length will be >10th percentile in 6 months
 Referral to feeding therapist by next clinic visit

Interventions:
 One food with added energy and protein will be offered
at each meal and snack
 RD will contact Carla’s PCP to initiate referral
Carla: Evaluating Progress
 Prealbumin will be in the normal range in 6 weeks
 Blood drawn: prealbumin was in the normal range
 Outcome modified: prealb, albumin WNL in 6 mos
 Weight-for-length >10th percentile in 6 months
 Weight-for-length 10th percentile
 Outcome modified: weight/age 5th-25th %iles, length/age10th-
50th %iles, weight/length 10th-50th %iles
 Referral to feeding therapist by next clinic visit
 Carla’s mother reported that referral made
 Outcome modified: Carla will receive feeding therapy
Aaron: Desired Outcomes

Aaron is an 8-year old with Down syndrome. In


9 months, Aaron has gained 7 kg. BMI-for-age is
at the 95th %ile

 Aaron will maintain a healthy weight


Aaron: Measurable Outcomes
Aaron is an 8-year old with Down syndrome. In 9
months, Aaron has gained 7 kg. BMI-for-age is at
the 95th %ile
 Aaron will maintain
his current weight
 Aaron will maintain (32 kg) until his
a healthy weight BMI-for-age is at
the 75th %ile
Aaron: Interventions
Aaron will maintain his current weight (32 kg)
until his BMI-for-age is at the 75th %ile

 Aaron will eat foods with fewer kilocalories


Aaron: Improved Interventions
Aaron will maintain his current weight (32 kg) until
his BMI-for-age is at the 75th %ile

 Aaron’s family will substitute foods with fewer


kilocalories for energy-dense foods (specific
information provided to Aaron’s family).
 Aaron will walk to school with his older brother 3
days each week
Justin
 18-month old with
trisomy 21 (Down
syndrome)
 Growth is appropriate
 Feeding skills are
delayed
 Receives OT, SLP
services
Justin: Feeding skills
 Give mother a handout
about feeding skill
development
 Suggest the family be
seen by a feeding
therapist
 Suggest that the OT
and SLP also work on
feeding skills
Justin: Improved Interventions
 Review feeding skill  Give mother a handout
development handout about feeding skill
with mother development
 Identify where Justin is  Suggest the family be
and what skills to seen by a feeding
reinforce therapist
 OUTCOME: Identify  Suggest that the OT and
desired feeding skills SLP also work on
and strategies family can feeding skills
use
Justin: Improved Interventions
 Give mother a handout
about development of
feeding skills
 Make a referral to a  Suggest the family be
community feeding team seen by a feeding
at an early intervention therapist
center  Suggest that the OT and
 OUTCOME: appointment SLP also work on
will be scheduled feeding skills
Justin: Improved Interventions
 Give mother a
handout about
development of
 Contact OT and SLP to discuss
feeding skills
a plan to address Justin’s
feeding skills  Suggest the family be
seen by a feeding
 OUTCOME: RD, OT and SLP
therapist
will develop list of feeding-
related recommendations for  Suggest that the OT
Justin before next nutrition and SLP also work on
appointment
feeding skills
Justin
Goals for nutrition
therapy:
 Maintain adequate
intake and
appropriate growth
 Improve feeding
skills
 Prevent overweight
Further thought…
Conclusion

 Resource sheet
 Post-test and evaluation

You might also like