Employee Performance

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

HR ANALYTICS – 4 TH TERM (2019-20) Prof Manish

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
Pivot point: where differences in performance most affect success
Example: Disney theme park
 What is the important talent for theme park success?
 Where would an improvement in the quality of talent and organization make the biggest difference in
strategic success?
 Faculty resources and staff resources
 Key constraint for the park: “delightful minutes”
 85 acres
 100s of small and large attractions
 Talent pool: Mickey Mouse and Park sweeper
WHY DOES PERFORMANCE VARY ACROSS JOBS
Two reasons
 Nature of the job: to the extent it allows autonomy and discretion
 Cooking French fries in a restaurant vs. project leader of an advertising campaign or a salesperson
 Relative value to the organization of variations in performance
 Software engineers designing new products for leading edge software companies vs. employees preparing daily reports in a
financial services company
 Variation is less crucial
 Mickey mouse vs sweeper
 Sweeper: high SD
 Mickey: high value
 McDonald’s vs. Starbucks: role of a front-line associate
 How would performance-yield curve for the two look like?
 Focus on achieving minimum standard vs improving performance
 Notion of “Find the Best Candidate for every position” – right or wrong?
 Kano Analysis: differential effect of improved performance
ROLE OF SD IN UTILITY ANALYSIS
It cannot generally be obtained from exiting records
 Has been most difficult parameter to obtain

Complicated cost accounting methods which are both costly and time consuming
 Cost in monetary value of each employee
 Then computing the SD

Some newer although subjective measures


COST ACCOUNTING APPROACH
Cost considerations
 Average value of production or service units
 Quality of objects produced or services accomplished
 Overhead, including rent, light, heat, cost depreciation, or rental of machines and equipment
 Errors, accidents, spoilage etc.
 General social effectiveness
 Time spent of other employees and mangers

Eight Steps
Limitation
 Not based on units of performance
40 PERCENT RULE
Wages and salaries average 57 percent of the value of goods and services
SD as 40% of salary
One SD difference therefore about 20% of average output
SD values differ based on complexity of jobs
 Less complex
 15%
 Medium
 25%
 High
 46%
 Life Insurance
 97%
 Salesperson
 39%
 Management, Leadership Jobs will have high SDs
GLOBAL ESTIMATION
If the monetary value of job performance is normally distributed
 85th percentile (one SD above average)
 50th percentile
 15th percentile

Two ways for calculating SDs


 By using the average value found for jobs of similar complexity
 Using supervisory estimates
CASCIO-RAMOS ESTIMATE OF PERFORMANCE IN
DOLLARS (CREPID)
Assumption: organization’s compensation program reflects current market rate for
jobs
8 steps
SD obtained is about 3 and half times larger than the SD of the actual distribution of
salaries
SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS TECHNIQUE
Situations in which individual salary is only a small percentage of the value of
performance to the organization or of the equipment operated
 It calculates the difference in system effectiveness between the average performer and someone who
is one SD better than average
SUPERIOR EQUIVALENTS TECHNIQUE
Uses estimate of how many superior (85th percentile) performers would be needed to
produce the output of a fixed number of average performers

You might also like