The document discusses different sociological perspectives on the self, including George Herbert Mead's theory that the self develops through social interaction and taking on different social roles. It also summarizes Charles Cooley's looking glass self theory, where people develop their self based on how they think others perceive them. Additional perspectives covered include social identity theory, postmodern views of a fragmented self, and Erving Goffman's theory that people manage impressions through social interactions like performances.
The document discusses different sociological perspectives on the self, including George Herbert Mead's theory that the self develops through social interaction and taking on different social roles. It also summarizes Charles Cooley's looking glass self theory, where people develop their self based on how they think others perceive them. Additional perspectives covered include social identity theory, postmodern views of a fragmented self, and Erving Goffman's theory that people manage impressions through social interactions like performances.
The document discusses different sociological perspectives on the self, including George Herbert Mead's theory that the self develops through social interaction and taking on different social roles. It also summarizes Charles Cooley's looking glass self theory, where people develop their self based on how they think others perceive them. Additional perspectives covered include social identity theory, postmodern views of a fragmented self, and Erving Goffman's theory that people manage impressions through social interactions like performances.
The document discusses different sociological perspectives on the self, including George Herbert Mead's theory that the self develops through social interaction and taking on different social roles. It also summarizes Charles Cooley's looking glass self theory, where people develop their self based on how they think others perceive them. Additional perspectives covered include social identity theory, postmodern views of a fragmented self, and Erving Goffman's theory that people manage impressions through social interactions like performances.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
Chapter 1: The self from various perspective
CAN YOU LIVE ON YOUR OWN?
identify the sociological perspectives about the self; demonstrate critical and reflective thinking in showing different aspects of the self; and examine yourself using Charles Horton Cooley’s Looking-Glass Self Theory He argued that the self is not biological but social He proposed the idea that the self develops through social interaction; that social interaction involves the exchange of symbols (i.e. laguange); and that understanding of symbols involves being able to take the role of another. Role playing is the process in which one takes on the role of another by putting oneself in the position of the person with whom he or she interacts For Mead, self is not inborn. Babies cannot interpret the meaning of other people’s behavior. Learned during childhood in these stages: Imitation or the Preparatory stage- a child imitates the behavior of his or her parents (sweeping the floor) Play stage- involves the child playing the role of others (act like teacher or parent) Game stage- To play the game, the child must be aware of his or her relationship to other people and place himself/herself in their roles in order to appreciate his/her particular role in the game For Mead, all humans experience internal conversation. This conversation involves the, I and Me, which is called phase of self. For him, self is essentially a social process going on between the I and Me. The I is the phase of the self that is unsocialized and spontaneous. “Free and Unique”. It is also the subjective part of the self. The Me, on the contrary, is the self that results from the progressive stages of role playing or role-taking and the perspective one assumes to view and analyze one’s own behavior. It represents the conventional and objective part of the self The Collective Self is the cognition concerning a view of the self that is found in memberships in social groups (i.e. family etc.) Example: A person identified as feminist. “Similar attributes of being a feminist” Mead describes Generalized others as an organized community or social group which gives to the individual his or her unity of self. Example: A dance group as a team as long as it is an organized process of social activity The looking glass self is a social psychological concept. In this view, the self is developed as a result of one’s perceptions of other people’s opinions. Example: A parent or teacher praise the child for his or her artistic skills, the child will infer that he or she is artistic, thus boosting child’s confidence People are the way they are at least partly because of other people’s reactions to them and to what they do The self is built to social interaction which involves three steps: People imagine how they must appear to others They imagine the judgment on that appearance They develop themselves through the judgment of others Looking glass self is made up of feelings about other people’s judgments of one’s behavior. Private Self- or individual self is the cognition that involves traits, states, and behaviors Example: I am generous- shows one’s knowledge of his or her attributes that differentiate him or her from the others Public Self- is the cognition concerning the generalized other’s view of the self. Example: People think I am religious- shows one’s relation with others and the role one assumes in that relationship Collective Self- is the cognition concerning a view of the self that is found in memberships in social groups Example: When a person is activist – attributes of being an activist (campaigns to bring about political or social change) Social identity theory has been defined as the person’s sense of who he or she is according to his or her membership to a certain group Group membership is an important source of pride and self-esteem. It gives sense of identity and belongingness to the social world Henri Tajfel pointed out that, the world is divided into “us” and “them” through the process of social categorization forming the social groups. William Graham Summer further divided these social groups into two: In-group- is an esteemed social group commanding a member’s loyalty “a person belongs” Out-group- one feels competition or opposition. “a person does not belong” A person has an inherent feeling of enhancing the status of the group. Example: in upholding the claim that Filipinos are the most hospitable people in the world, Filipinos increase their self- image by interacting with other Filipinos, the in-group (the group one identifies with) Tajfel and Turner identified three mental processes in evaluating “us and them” Social Categorization- how people categorize things Social Identification- people adapt the identity of the group to which they have categorized themselves (ex. When we categorize Christians, chances are they will adopt the identity of a Christian) Social Comparison- after categorizing and identifying a group, they tend to compare that group with other groups. In the postmodernist view, self is not the creator of meaning, nor the center of starting a point of sociological inquiry. There are four basic postmodernist ideas about the self (Anderson): Multiphrenia- refers to the many different voices speaking about “who were are and what we are” (You can be a student, a sibling, a friend, GF/BF) Protean- a self is capable of changing constantly to fit the present conditions. (You may not be at ease to talk with gays and lesbians as a teenager, but now you are not bothered at all) De-centered- a belief that there is no self at all. The self is constantly being redefined or constantly undergoing change. Self-in-relation- which means that humans do not live their lives in isolation but in relation to people and to certain cultural contexts Postmodern social condition is dominated by two realities: The rise of new media technologies The dominance of consumerism Lyon argued that the predicament of the self in postmodern societies is complicated by the advent of electronic-mediated virtual interactions of cyber selves and the spread of information technology The self is digitalized in cyberspace For Goffman, social interaction may be compared to a theater and people to actors on a stage where each plays a variety of roles He posited the idea that people interact with one another they are constantly engaged in impression management. People regulate and control information in social interaction He used imagery of theater in order to portray the nuances and significance of face to face social interaction (i.e. actor, audience, performance). For him, the self is a product of the dramatic interaction between actor and audience: In real life, everyday interactions happen in three regions: The front stage- is a region where actors perform and act in conformity with the expectations of the audience The back stage- is the region where actors behave differently. The place where actors act their natural selves The off stage- where actors meet members of the audience independently. Saturated self is characterized by constant connection to others, a self that absorbs a multitude of voices (sometimes contradictory) and takes seemingly endless streams of information. This saturation contradicts the notion of a singular, true, authentic self, and instead gives way to a self- consisting of “multiple” selves This is due to the splitting of the self into multitude of options which Gargen’s calls Multiphrenia. That is people establish multiple selves through absorption of the multiple voices of people in their lives, either real life or through the media People then internalize these different selves, thus creating a seemingly endless pool of selves that they can choose to draw upon depending on the needs of the current situation. People create and experiment with multiple selves by utilizing our current technology (internet, video games). These mediums help people to construct idealized version of who they are by selectively representing various aspects of their selves like self- promotion on the internet.