Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
Common variation is
Example: A molding process that
inherent in the production always leaves “burrs” or flaws on
process a molded item.
Taguchi’s View of Variation
Traditional view is that quality within the LSL & USL is good and that the cost
of quality outside this range is constant, whereas Taguchi views costs as
increasing as variability increases, so seek to achieve zero defects and that will
truly minimize quality costs.
High High
Incremental Incremental
Cost of Cost of
Variability Variability
Zero Zero
Tolerances
Choice of process & its consistency
Perfectly centered process
Process limits
Specification limits
How do the limits relate to one another?
Process capability
How well the process is capable of producing parts relative to the
design tolerances
Process Capability Index, Cpk
Capability Index shows how X LTL UTL - X
well parts being produced fit C pk = min or
into the range specified by the 3 3
design limits
As a production process
produces items small shifts
in equipment or systems
can cause differences in
production performance
from differing samples.
A simple ratio:
Specification width/ Actual process width
Generally, the bigger the better
Process Capability
X LTL UTL X
C pk Min ;
3 3
Specification or
Tolerance Limits X LTL UTL X
Upper Spec = 16.8 oz C pk Min ;
3 3
Lower Spec = 15.2 oz
Observed Weight
Mean = 15.875 oz 15.875 15.2 16.8 15.875
C pk Min ;
Std Dev = .529 oz
3(.529) 3(.529)
C pk Min.4253; .5829
C pk .4253
What does a Cpk of .4253 mean?
What percentage of boxes are defective (i.e. less than 15.2 oz)?
Z LTL= (x – Mean)/Std. Dev. = (15.2 – 15.875)/.529 = -1.276
NORMSDIST(Z) = NORMSDIST(-1.276) = .100978
Approx. 10 % of the boxes have less than 15.2 ounces of cereal in them!
Similarly,
Z UTL= (x – Mean)/Std. Dev. = (16.8 – 15.875)/.529 = 1.748
NORMSDIST(Z) = NORMSDIST(1.748) = .0402
Approx. 4 % of the boxes have more than 16.8 ounces of cereal in them!
Process Control Procedures
Process Control
Monitoring quality when the product is being produced
Provide timely information on whether products are meeting
design specifications
process has shifted
Statistical Process Control
Testing random sample from a process
Is the process producing items within a preselected range?
Types of quality characteristics
Attribute (Go or no-go information)
Defectives refers to the acceptability of product across a
range of characteristics
Defects refers to the number of defects per unit which may
be higher than the number of defectives
p-chart application
Variable (Continuous)
Usually measured by the mean and the standard deviation
X-bar and R chart applications
Statistical UCL
1 2 3 4 5 Samples
6 over time
UCL
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 Samples
6 over time
UCL
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 Samples
6 over time
Control Limits based on the Normal Curve
x
m
z
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Standard
deviation units or
“z” units.
Control Limits
We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL) and
the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus or minus 3
standard deviations from some x-bar or mean value.
Based on this we can expect 99.7% of our sample
observations to fall within these limits.
99.7%
x
LCL UCL
Example of Constructing a p-Chart:
Required Data
Given: T o ta l N u m b e r o f D e fe c tiv e s
p =
T o ta l N u m b e r o f O b s e rv a tio n s
p (1 - p)
sp =
n
Compute control limits:
UCL = p + z sp
LCL = p - z sp
Constructing a p-chart: Step 1
Sample n Defectives p
1. Calculate the 1 100 4 0.04
sample proportions, 2 100 2 0.02
3 100 5 0.05
p (these are what 4 100 3 0.03
can be plotted on the 5 100 6 0.06
p-chart) for each 6 100 4 0.04
7 100 3 0.03
sample 8 100 7 0.07
9 100 1 0.01
10 100 2 0.02
11 100 3 0.03
12 100 2 0.02
13 100 2 0.02
14 100 8 0.08
15 100 3 0.03
Constructing a p-chart: Steps 2&3
55
p = = 0.036
1500
3. Calculate the standard deviation of the
sample proportion
p (1 - p) .036(1- .036)
sp = = = .0188
n 100
Constructing a p-chart: Step 4
UCL = p + z sp
LCL = p - z sp
.036 3(.0188)
UCL = 0.0924
LCL = -0.0204 (or 0)
Constructing a p-Chart: Step 5
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1 UCL
p 0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0 LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
O b servation
x-bar and R Charts: Required Data
1 0 .8 5 0 UCL
1 0 .8 0 0
1 0 .7 5 0
M ea n s
1 0 .7 0 0
1 0 .6 5 0
1 0 .6 0 0
LCL
1 0 .5 5 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S am p le
x-bar and R charts: Steps 5&6
Calculate R-chart and Plot Values
UCL = D 4 R ( 2.11)(0.2204) 0.46504
LCL = D3 R (0)(0.2204) 0
0 .8 0 0
0 .7 0 0
0 .6 0 0
0 .5 0 0
UCL
R 0 .4 0 0
0 .3 0 0
0 .2 0 0
0 .1 0 0
0 .0 0 0
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S a m p le
Basic Forms of Statistical Sampling for
Quality Control
Acceptance Sampling
sampling to accept or reject the immediate lot of
product at hand
Percentage of products conforming to specifications
Statistical Process Control
sampling to determine if the process is within acceptable
limits
Acceptance Sampling
Purposes
Determine quality level
Ensure quality is within predetermined level
Advantages
Economy
Less handling damage
Fewer inspectors
Upgrading of the inspection job
Applicability to destructive testing
Entire lot rejection (motivation for improvement)
Acceptance Sampling
Disadvantages
Risks of accepting “bad” lots and rejecting “good” lots
Added planning and documentation
Sample provides less information than 100-percent inspection
Acceptance Sampling:
Single Sampling Plan
Decision about lot from one sample of items selected
at random from a lot
Determine
1. how many units, n, to sample from a lot, and
2. the maximum number of defective items, c, that can be
found in the sample before the lot is rejected
Risk
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
Max. acceptable percentage of defectives defined by
producer
The α (Producer’s risk)
The probability of rejecting a good lot
Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)
Percentage of defectives that defines consumer’s
rejection point
The (Consumer’s risk)
The probability of accepting a bad lot
Operating Characteristic Curve
The OCC brings the concepts of producer’s risk, consumer’s risk, sample size,
and maximum defects allowed together
1 The shape or
0.9 a = .05 (producer’s risk) slope of the
0.8 curve is
dependent on
Probability of acceptance
0.7 n = 99 a particular
0.6 c=4 combination of
0.5 the four
0.4 parameters
0.3 =.10
0.2 (consumer’s risk)
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
AQL LTPD
Percent defective
Example: Acceptance Sampling Problem
Zypercom, a manufacturer of video interfaces, purchases
printed wiring boards from an outside vender, Procard.
Procard has set an acceptable quality level of 1% and
accepts a 5% risk of rejecting lots at or below this level.
Zypercom considers lots with 3% defectives to be
unacceptable and will assume a 10% risk of accepting a
defective lot.
Then find the value for “c” by selecting the value in the
TN8.10 “n(AQL)”column that is equal to or just greater than
the ratio above.
c = 6, from Table
n (AQL) = 3.286, from Table
AQL = .01, given in problem
Sampling Plan:
Take a random sample of 329 units from a lot.
Reject the lot if more than 6 units are defective.