Prepared By:-Shifa Goyal B.Arch 2016-21 Roll No. 22 Faculty of Architeture Urban Planner and Author
Prepared By:-Shifa Goyal B.Arch 2016-21 Roll No. 22 Faculty of Architeture Urban Planner and Author
Prepared By:-Shifa Goyal B.Arch 2016-21 Roll No. 22 Faculty of Architeture Urban Planner and Author
Environmental images are the result of a two-way process between the observer and his
environment. The environment suggests distinctions and relations, and the observer with
great adaptability and in the light of his own purposes selects, organizes, and endows with
meaning what he sees.
There may be little in the real object that is ordered or remarkable, and yet its mental picture
has gained identity and organization through long familiarity. One man may find objects easily
on what seems to anyone else to be a totally disordered work table.
As manipulators of the physical environment, city planners are primarily interested in the
external agent in the interaction which produces the environmental image. Different
environments resist or facilitate the process of image-making.
So the planners try to create an image to which the majority of people agree on.
3. STRUCTURE AND IDENTITY
An environmental image may be analyzed into three components: identity, structure, and
meaning.
A workable image requires first the identification of an object, which implies its distinction
from other things, its recognition as a separable entity. This is called identity.
Second, the image must include the spatial or pattern relation of the object to the observer
and to other objects i.e. the structure.
Finally, this object must have some meaning for the observer, whether practical or
emotional.
Thus an image useful for making an exit requires the recognition of a door as a distinct entity,
of its spatial relation to the observer, and its meaning as a hole for getting out. These are not
truly separable. The visual recognition of a door is matted together with its meaning as a
door.
If it is our purpose to build cities for the enjoyment of vast numbers of people of widely
diverse background—and cities which will also be adaptable to future purposes—we may
even be wise to concentrate on the physical clarity of the image and to allow meaning to
develop without our direct guidance.
4. IMAGEABILITY
That quality in a physical object which gives it a high probability of evoking a strong image in
any given observer.
It is that shape, color, or arrangement which facilitates the making of vividly identified,
powerfully structured, highly useful mental images of the environment.
A highly imageable city in this peculiar sense would seem well formed , distinct , remarkable ;
it would invite the eye and the ear to greater attention and participation .
In the United States , one is tempted to cite parts of Manhattan , San Francisco , Boston , or
perhaps the lake front of Chicago.
Since image development is a two-way process between observer and observed , it is possible
to strengthen the image either by symbolic devices , by the retraining o f the perceiver , or by
reshaping one' s surroundings . You ca n provide the viewer with a symbolic diagram o f how
the world fit s together : a map or a set of written instructions.
Kevin Lynch found that there are five basic elements which people use to construct
their mental image of a city:
1. Pathways
2. Edges
3. Districts
4. Nodes, and
5. Landmarks
1. PATHS
3. DISTRICTS
• Districts are the medium-to-large sections of the city
which the observer mentally enters "inside of," and which
are recognizable as having some common, identifying
character
• Always identifiable from the inside , they are also used
for exterior reference if visibe from the outside
4. NODES
Nodes are points, the strategic spots in a city into which
an observer can enter, and which are the intensive foci to
and from which he is traveling.
They may be primarily junctions or concentrations which
gain their importance from being the condensation of
some use or physical character, as a street-corner
hangout or an enclosed square.
Some of these concentration nodes are the focus and
epitome of a district , over which their influence radiates
and of which they stand as a symbol . They may be called
cores.
5. LANDMARKS
Landmarks are another type of point-reference, but in
this case the observer does not enter within them, they
are external.
They are usually a rather simply defined physical object:
building, sign, store, or mountain.
They are frequently used clues of identity and even of
structure, and seem to be increasingly relied upon as a
journey becomes more and more familiar.
VISUAL ELEMENTS OF BOSTON
VISUAL ELEMENTS OF NEW YORK CITY
https://www.slideshare.net/rajapukai/image-of-the-city-kevin-lynch-case-study
http://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1960_Kevin_Lynch_The_Image_of_
The_City_book.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_A._Lynch
http://architectureandurbanism.blogspot.com/2010/09/kevin-lynch-image-of-city-
1960.html