Human Resource Management Notes
Human Resource Management Notes
Human Resource Management Notes
Management
TWELFTH EDITION
GARY DESSLER
BIJU VARKKEY
Chapter 9
Comparing
Performance Appraisal
and
Performance Management
Total Quality
The
Performance
Appraisal Issues
Management
Approach
Strategic Focus
Guidelines for
Effective Goal Setting
Assign
Assign Assign
Challenging Encourage
Specific Measurable
but Doable Participation
Goals Goals
Goals
2 Appraising performance
3 Providing feedback
• How to Measure?
Generic dimensions
Actual job duties
Behavioral competencies
Reprinted by permission of
Society for Human
Resource
Management via Copyright
Clearance Center.
Copyright © 2011 Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd
Authorized adaptation from the United States edition of Human
Resource Management, 12/e
9–18
FIGURE 9–3
Sample
Performance
Rating Form
(continued)
Appraisal Methodologies
Note: + means “better than.” – means “worse than.” For each chart, add
Copyright © 2011 Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd up the number of +’s in each column to get the highest-ranked employee.
Authorized adaptation from the United States edition of Human
Resource Management, 12/e
9–23
TABLE 9–1 Examples of Critical Incidents for Assistant Plant Manager
Problems with
MBO
Conflict with
subordinates over
objectives
Copyright © 2011 Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd
Authorized adaptation from the United States edition of Human
Resource Management, 12/e
9–29
Appraising Performance:
Problems and Solutions
Potential Rating
Scale Appraisal
Problems
Quality of work
Quantity of work
Creativity
Integrity
Note: For example, what exactly is meant by “good,” “quantity of work,” and so forth?
How to Avoid
Appraisal Problems
Control
Know Use the Train Keep
Outside
Problems Right Tool Supervisors a Diary
Influences
Alternation ranking Simple to use (but not as simple as Can cause disagreements among
graphic rating scales). Avoids central employees and may be unfair if all
tendency and other problems of employees are, in fact, excellent.
rating scales.
Forced distribution End up with a predetermined number Employees’ appraisal results depend
method or % of people in each group. on your choice of cutoff points.
Critical incident Helps specify what is “right” and Difficult to rate or rank employees
method “wrong” about the employee’s relative to one another.
performance; forces supervisor to
evaluate subordinates on an ongoing
basis.
Immediate
Self-Rating
Supervisor
Peers
Potential Subordinates
Appraisers
Rating 360-Degree
Committee Feedback
Satisfactory—Promotable
Satisfactory—Not Promotable
Types of Appraisal
Interviews
Unsatisfactory—Correctable
Unsatisfactory—Uncorrectable
Guidelines for
Conducting an Interview
3 Postpone action.
1
Do it in a manner that lets the person maintain
his or her dignity and sense of worth.