Basic Concepts of Public Policy and Theories

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 36

Basic Concepts of Public Policy and Theories

Public policy definitions

“Course of action of a person, group, or a government to reach a goal or realize an


object or a purpose” (Friedrich, 1963)

“Set of interrelated decisions taken by a political actor or group of actors concerning


the selection of goals and the means of achieving them” (Jenkins, 1978)

“The actions of government and the intentions that determine those actions” (Cochran
et al.)

“The outcome of the struggle in government over who get what” (Cochran et al.)

What government chooses to do or not to do (Dye, 2002)

A statement by government of what it intends to do such as a law, regulation, ruling,


decision, order or a combination of these.
What is public policy

Daniel McCool (Political Science, University of Arizona . ... Professor)


argues that modern policy studies began in 1922 when Charles Merriam
(Charles Edward Merriam, Jr. was a professor of political science at the
University of Chicago,-1874-1953)sought to connect the theory and practice
of politics to understanding the actual activities of government.

“Discipline” of public policy did not sprung into existence in 1950s and
1960s.

Contemporary discipline – debate remains over whether there is one


coherent set of principles that can govern the study and understanding of
what we call the public policy process
Politics and Public Policy

 Public Policy – an important aspect of Political Science


But what is Politics?
A process by which societies help figure out how to
organize and regulate themselves (Harold Lasswell);
how to govern themselves.
What makes it “Political”?
 Its location, position, and setting in the public sphere.
 Whatever the scale, public policy address problems
that are public or more importantly, that some number
of people think that should be public, instead of
private.
Key attributes of Public Policy

Policy is made in response to some sort of problem that requires attention.

Policy is made on the “public’s” behalf.

Policy is oriented towards a goal or desired state.

Policy is ultimately made by the governments.

Policy is interpreted and implemented by public and private actors who have
different interpretations of problems, solutions and their own motivations

Policy is what the government chooses to do or not to do.


Public Policy Processes
Research on the formulation and implementation of public policy – issue emergence and policy agendas, the cultural
definition of policy problems, policy formulation, political feasibility and policy implementation.

Comparative Public policy


analysis to the substance of different policy problems – mostly cross-national and cross-regional. Mostly descriptive, rather
than theoretical

Public Policy Analysis


Logic of analysis and mix of techniques in support of public policy decision making. “Rational” analysis contains a central
focus on problem specification, generation of alternative policies and assessment of policy in support public policy decision
making.

Public Policy Research

Consists of applied social science research aimed at documenting policy problems and evaluating interventions.
1. Constituent.
2. Distributive
3. Regulatory
4. Redistributive
5. Material
6. Symbolic
7. Capitalization Public Policy
8. Technical Public Policy

The primary differentiates on the basis of their


effects in society and relationship among this
involved in their formation.
1. Constituent Public Policy

Policies for Govt Structures, with the


establishment of rules/ procedures for
the conduct of rules that distribute or
divert power and jurisdictions through
which present and future polices might
be made-regarded as state building.
(Development of New Depts,)
2. Distributive Public Policy

Using public funds to


assist particular groups/
communities/industries
and this seek benefits of
funds (Flood control,
highways).
3. Regulatory Public Policy

Imposes restriction or
limitations on the behaviors of
individuals or groups (banks,
business regulations, pollution
controls, competitive
regulatory polices etc).
4. Redistributed Public Policy

Deliberate efforts of Govt to shift


the allocation of wealth, income,
property or rights among broad
classes or groups of the
population, such as haves and have
not and bourgeoisie (higher tax to
low income group.
5- Material Policy

Provide tangible resources or


substantive power to their
beneficiaries or impose real
disadvantages on this that are
adversely affected. (Minimum
wage, Support Wheat Price etc)
6- Symbolic Policy

In contrast to material for


advantage/disadvantages to
people, Symbolic refer to
Cherished value such as
patriotism, social justice, UN
do lot of things
7. Capitalization Public Policy

These policies are related to financial


subsidies given by the Centre to state and
local governments and central and state
business undertakings, etc and is not directly
linked to public welfare as the others listed
above. it does contribute but indirectly. It is
basically infrastructural and development
policies for govt. business organizations to
keep functioning properly
8. Technical Public Policy

It relates to the policies framed


for arrangement of procedures,
rules and framework which a
system shall provide for
discharge of action by various
agencies on the field(S&TI)
Theories of Public Policy
Political system theory

Institutional Theory

Process Theory

Group Theory

Elite Theory

Rationalism Theory

Incrementalism Theory

Game Theory

Public Choice Theory

System Theory
Political System (P.S)Theory (David Easton 1917 –
2014, American political scientist, Univeristy of
Chicago)
Consist of Social System, economic system, biological setting.
 Demand arising from Environment.
 Social System
 Identifiable and interrelated institutions and activities in
society that make decision to be comply-with by society.
 Input = Demand + Support + Feedback->
Political System = Output -> Laws+ Decision-Feedback
 Output of P.S = laws, rules, judicial decisions,

Constraint: Highly general and abstract. Policy is


developed in bloc called political system.
Public policy as institutional output

Who: executive, legislative, and judicial branches

How: policy is authoritatively determined, implemented,


and enforced by these institutions (legitimacy, universality,
and coercion/compulsion)

Implications/assumptions: individuals have little


impact; structure/design affects outcomes
Critique on Institutional Model

It is possible when all institutions are


studied thoroughly and the relationships it
shares with other organizations and also in a
developing society where one organization
provides overlapping services with another
organization then it becomes difficult to
segregate and duplication occurs wasting
money and resources of the country people.
Process Theory

Public policy as political activity

Who: voters, interest groups, legislators, presidents,


bureaucrats, judges

How: ID problem, set agenda, formulate policy proposals,


legitimate policies, implement policies, evaluate policies

Implications/assumptions: who participates has a


critical or determinant impact on the process
Public policy as group equilibrium

Who: interest groups, their allies in


government

 How: struggle among interest groups with


legislature/executive as referee to manage group
conflict and establish rules of the game

 Implications/assumptions: groups will


always join to press for particular issues, all
interests will have an opportunity for
representation
Critique on Group Theory

It states that a few groups and


lobbies who have stronghold on
organized agitation and means to
influence bureaucracy and
legislature get their way in view of
lack of other organized opposition.
Elite Theory
Public policy as elite preference

 Who: elites that have power, ability to allocate


value

 How: implementation of the preferences and


values of the governing elite; public officials
merely carry out policies decided on by the
elites

 Implications/assumptions: public is
apathetic/indifferent, elites agree upon norms;
political action is merely symbolic; protects the
status quo
Critique on Elite Theory
Here it is stated that only a few people who are
referred to as elite, who are the public
administrators and politicians are the only ones
who possess the knowledge to make policies and
hence no need to interact with others who are not
equipped in this matter. It does not take into
account the importance of civil society
organizations and other non profit and voluntary
associations possessing grass root knowledge of
issues and solutions to the same.
Rationalism Theory

Public policy as maximum social gain

Who: decision makers (all social, political,


economic values sacrificed or achieved by a
policy choice) irrespective of dollar amount
(Bentham, Mills)
 How: select policy alternative(s) that allows
gains to society to exceed benefits by the
greatest amount
 Implications/assumptions: assumes that the
values preferences of the society as a whole can
be known and weighted
Critique on Rationalism

Problems arise when put into practice since


social and environmental values can be
difficult to quantify and gather a consensus on
the same . Not totally practical as it is based
on the principle that the decision maker is
aware of all facts and statistics that are to be
considered in the current situation and knows
the best way to deal and take a completely
rational decision.
Incrementalism Theory

Public policy as variations on the past

Who: policy makers, legislators, others with a stake in ongoing programs or


problems

How: continuation of past government activities with only incremental


modifications

Implications/assumptions: accepts the legitimacy of established


programs; fear of unintended consequences; sunk costs in other programs
may minimize the opportunities for radical change
Critique on Incrementalism

It only looks at immediate problems and short


term solutions by taking one step at a time
and leaves behind the overall issue for which
the root has to be pulled out otherwise
whatever little work is done will be undone
very soon. And also it gives way to steps that
enter quietly and were never thought of in the
first place which may or may not be useful.
Game Theory

Public policy as rational choice in competitive situations

Who: players/decision makers who have choices to make and the


outcome depends on the choice made by each (assumes rationality in
making choices)

How: each player has goals and resources, a strategy developed given
possible moves of opponent, and payoff values that constitute the
outcomes of the game

Implications/assumptions: repeated plays should lead to better


policy outcomes
Critique on Game Theory

It justifies selfishness in the name of


self interest and values are extremely
variable so you cannot say that
everyone will behave/respond in the
same manner as everybody is not
completely rational as claimed by the
concept of the Games Theory Model.
Public Choice

Public policy as collective decision making by self-


interested individuals

Who: rational self-interested individuals will in both politics


and economics cooperate to achieve their goals

How: individuals come together in politics for their own


mutual benefit; government must respond to market failures

Implications/assumptions: individuals have sufficient


information to know what is in their best interest
System Theory

Public policy as system output

Who: individuals, groups, or nations depending upon the scope of the problem

How: environment may stimulate inputs into political system, producing outputs and
feedback

Implications/assumptions: systems implies an identifiable set of institutions and


activities in society that functions to transforms demands into authoritative decisions
requiring the support of the whole society; implies that the elements of the system are
interrelated, that the system can respond to forces in its environment, and that it will do so
to preserve itself
Critique on systems Theory

Though considered useful still has various limitations. Thomas


Dye points out that in the Systems Model significant
characteristics of the political system, which plays a very important
role in the policy process of transforming decisions into policies
has been lacking. Furthermore, the environmental inputs that
influence the political systems have also not been clearly defined
and described. It is also seen as too simple an approach to explain
the complex cycle of policies. It employs value laden
techniques(Presupposing the acceptance of a particular set of
values) of welfare economics and other factors like rationality,
power, personnel and institutions,etc have been neglected and not
shown as integral ingredients in the policy cycle.

You might also like