Chapter 10: Risk-Return and Asset Pricing Models
Chapter 10: Risk-Return and Asset Pricing Models
Chapter 10: Risk-Return and Asset Pricing Models
Pricing Models
Return
Level of risk
Unique risk/Unsystematic
risk
No of asset
Markowitz Portfolio Theory:
Markowitz model assumes the followings:
Investors consider each investment alternative as being
represented by a probability distribution of expected returns
over some holding period.
Investors maximize one period expected utility and their utility
curves demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of wealth.
Investors estimate the risk of the portfolio on the basis of the
variability of expected returns.
Investors base decisions solely on expected return and risk, so
their utility curves are a function of expected return and
expected variance of returns.
For a given level of risk, investors prefer higher returns to lower
returns and for a given level of expected return investors prefer
less risk to more risk.
Portfolios of two risky assets:
The lower the correlation between assets, the greater the gain in
efficiency.
2 E Cov(rD , rE )
wmin ( D) 2
D 2 E 2Cov(rD , rE )
Example: Stock fund offers 12% return with 3.5% risk and debt fund offers 10% return
with 3% risk. Correlation coefficient between stock and debt is 0.40.
If the correlation coefficient between stock and debt is negative 0.40, then
optimal allocation will be as:
3.52 3.5 * 3 * (0.40)
Wmin ( D) 2
3 3.52 2 * 3.5 * 3 * (0.40)
0.55
and WMin (E) = 1 0.55 = 0.45
Calculate the portfolio return and risk for determined weights
and by assuming any other allocation than that of optimal
allocation.
Asset allocation with stocks, bonds and bills
(The optimal risky portfolio with two risky assets and a risk-
free asset):
The proportion of fund to be allocated in each specific risky asset and risk-
free asset for getting lowest level of portfolio risk can be determined by
applying the following formulae:
E (rp ) rF )
Wmin ( D)
0.01A 2 p
And
[E(rD ) - rF ] 2 E [E(rE ) rF ] Cov(rD , rE )
Wmin ( D ) [E(r ) - r ] 2E [E(r ) r ] 2D [E(r ) r E(r ) r ] Cov(r , r )
D F E F D F E F D E
E ( rp ) r f
Wmin ( M )
0.01A 2 p
It means 40% of fund allocated is to be invested in debt instrument and 60% fund is to be
invested in equity instrument out of fund allocation in two risky assets. Now proportion of
fund is to be allocated in risky and risk-free portfolio is:
E (rp ) rF ) 11 5
Wmin (M ) 0.7439
0.01A 2 p .01* 4 *14.2 2
WMin (Y) = 1.00 0.7439 = 25.61%
WMin (D) = 0.7439*0.40 = 29.76%
WMin (E) = 0.7439*0.60 = 44.63%
Global minimum-variance portfolio: The portfolio involves the lowest level of risk
out of all portfolios positioned on the frontier is known as global minimum-variance
portfolio.
Efficient frontier: The part of the frontier lies above the global minimum-variance
portfolio is considered as efficient frontier.
Capital asset pricing model (CAPM):
E(R) = Rf + (Rm Rf),
here
E(R) = Expected rate of return.
Rf = Risk-free rate,
Rm = Market rate,
= Beta coefficient
Assumptions of CAPM:
1. There are many investors, each with an endowment that is small compared
to the total endowment of all investors and they are price-takers.
2.All investors plan for one identical holding period.
3. Investments are limited to a universe of publicly traded financial assets.
4. Investors pay no taxes on returns and no transaction costs.
5.All investors are rational mean-variance optimizers.
6. All investors analyze securities in the same way and share the same
economic view of the world.
SML
SML
Return
SML
Rf
Systematic risk
Capital market line (CML): The line shows the positive
relationship between expected rate of return and level of total risk
for a financial asset is known as capital market line. The graphical
presentation is as follows:
Return
CML
Rf
Total risk
Characteristics line (CL): The line represents the relationship between
market rate of return and expected rate of return of a financial asset is
known as characteristics line. There may be positive, negative, vertical and
horizontal relationship between market rate of return and expected rate of
return of a financial asset.The graphical presentation is as follows:
Security Return
CL1
CL3
CL2
Market return
Risk Management in Islam
The broad perspective on risk and its management are embodied in the overall goals
of Islamic law or maqasid al-shariah. Chapra (2008a) quotes al-Ghazali in defining
maqasid as promotion of the well-being of the people, which lies in safeguarding their
faith (din), their self (nafs), their intellect (aql), their posterity (nasl), and their wealth
(mal). The principle of maqasid would imply taking all the precautions to safeguard
present and future wealth. As risk in economics represents the probable loss of wealth,
it is not desirable in itself from an Islamic perspective. While risks are not desirable on
their own, they must be undertaken to create wealth and value. From an Islamic
perspective, economic activities are not judged by their inherent risks, but by whether
they add value and/or create wealth.
In line with the above discussion, Hassan (2009) identifies three types of risks from the
Islamic perspective. First, is the essential risk that is inherent in all business transaction.
This business risk is necessary and must be undertaken to reap the associated reward
or profit. We find that two legal maxims are associated with returns to essential risks
from the basis of Islamic economic transactions. The first maxim states the
determinant is as a return for the benefit (al-gjorm bil ghunm) (Majalla Art 87). This
maxim attaches the entitlement of gain to the responsibility of loss. The second
maxim is derived from the Prophetic saying al-kharaj bil daman stating the benefit of
a thing is a return for the liability for loss from that thing (Majalla Art.85) The maxim
asserts that the party enjoying the full benefits of an asset or object should bear the
risks of ownership. By putting together these two legal maxims, we can say that for
every investment, the investor must have to take risk in order to get some return
from it. At the same time, with return there comes responsibility, specifically
responsibility to share the loss associated with the investment. So developing the
portfolio, an investor must have to remember these two legal maxims.
Risk Management in Islam
The second risk is the prohibited risk in the form of excessive gharar. Gharar is usually
translated as uncertainty, risk or hazard, but it also implies ignorance, gambling,
cheating and fraud. Generally, gharar related to ambiguity and/or ignorance, gambling,
cheating and fraud. Thus a sale can be void due to gharar due to risk existence and
taking possession of the object of sale on the one hand, and uncertainty about the
quantity, quality, price or time of payment on the other. While making investment, we
have to minimize this uncertainty factor at certain level so that it does make the
whole transaction prohibited.
The final form of risk identified by Hassan is the permissible risk that does not fall in
the above two categories. For example, operational risks, liquidity risks, etc. These risks
can either be accepted or avoided.
The principles of risk management from an Islamic perspective are to link risk and
causality. There is a need to distinguish between causes and uncertain outcomes. In
uncertain situations, individuals have control over the causal factors, but not the
outcome. There is a Prophetic saying of tie the camel and then entrust it to God, so
the Islamic approach to risk management would be to understand and control the
causes of risks and then leave the final outcome to the will of Allah (s.w.t.).