Change and Innovations
Change and Innovations
Change and Innovations
Organization Change
and Innovation
1
The Nature of Organization Change
Organization Change
Any substantive modification to some part of the
organization.
Change can involve any aspect of organization: work
schedules, machinery, organization design, span of
management, employees, etc.
It is important to keep in mind that any change in an
organization may have effects extending beyond the
actual area where the change is implemented.
2
The Nature of Organization Change
Forces for Change
External forces in the organizations general and task
environments that force the organization to alter the
way in which it competes.
Energy crisis, currency exchange rates, new rules of
production, new laws, technological development, inflation,
cost of living, socio-cultural dimension, etc.
Internal forces inside the organization that cause it to
change its structure and strategy; some internal forces
are responses to external pressures.
Revisions in organizations strategy, workers attitude towards
their job, change in working hours or working conditions.
3
The Nature of Organization Change
Planned Change
Change that is designed and implemented in an orderly
and timely fashion in anticipation of future events.
To develop a multistage change program intended to
educate workers about safety, improve safety
equipment in the organization, & eliminate firms bad
culture to achieve the best safety record.
Reactive Change
Change that is a piecemeal response to events and
circumstances as they develop.
Kodak had to cut 12,000 jobs in reaction to sluggish
sales and profits. 4
Managing Change in Organizations
Organization change is a complex phenomenon.
A manager cannot simply implement a planned
change like magic.
The manager needs to understand the steps of
effective change and how to counter employee
resistance to change.
In this section we will discuss
Steps in the Change Process
Understanding Resistance to Change
Overcoming Resistance to Change
5
Steps in the Change Process
Researchers have over the years developed a number of
models or frameworks outlining steps for change.
The Lewin model was one of the first
Also a more comprehensive approach is more useful in
today's complex business environment
Lewin Model
Kurt Lewin suggested that every change requires three
steps.
Unfreezing
Individuals who will be affected by the impending change must
be led to recognize why the change is necessary.
Implementing change
The change itself is implemented
Refreezing
Involves reinforcing and supporting the change so
6
that it becomes a part of the system.
Steps in the Change Process
A Comprehensive Approach to Change
The comprehensive approach to change takes a
systems view and delineates a series of specific
steps that often leads to successful change.
This expanded model is illustrated in Figure 18.1.
7
Figure 18.1
Recognition of the need for change
Steps in the Change Process
Actual implementation
10
A Comprehensive Approach to Change
Fifth and sixth, after the appropriate technique has
been chosen, its implementation must be planned.
Issues to consider include the costs of the change, its
effects on other areas of the organization, and the
degree of employee participation appropriate for the
situation.
Seventh, if the change is implemented as planned,
the results should then be evaluated.
If the change was intended to reduce turnover,
managers must check turnover after the change has
been in effect for a while.
If turnover is still too high, other changes may be
11
necessary
Understanding Resistance to Change
Managers need to know why people resist change and what
can be done about their resistance
People resist change because of:
Uncertainty: In the face of impending change, employees
may become anxious and nervous. They may worry about
their ability to meet new job demands, they may think that
their job security is threatened, or they may simply dislike
ambiguity.
Threats to self-interests: Many impending changes
threaten the self-interests of some managers within the
organization. A change might diminish their power or
influence within the company, so they fight it.
12
Understanding Resistance to Change
People resist change because of:
Different perceptions: A manager may make a decision
and recommend a plan for change on the basis of her
own assessment of a situation. Others in the
organization may resist the change because they do not
agree with the manager's assessment or perceive the
situation differently
Feelings of loss: Most people resist any change that
might adversely affect social relationships. Other
intangibles threatened by change include power, status,
security, familiarity with existing procedures, and self
confidence.
13
Overcoming Resistance to Change
Methods of handling resistance
Kotter and Schlesinger have suggested six major
methods to deal with the resistance to change
realizing the causes, sources, types and
implications of resistance to change:
14
Education and Where people lack information or have inaccurate
communication information and analysis of the situation
Participation and Where all the information needed to design the change is not
Involvement available, and where others have considerable power to resist
Facilitation and Support In situations where people are resisting because they
have adjustment problems
Manipulation and Co- Situations where other tactics will not work, or are too
optation expensive
Explicit and Implicit Where sped is essential and the change initiators
coercion possess considerable power
Areas of Organization Change
Change can involve virtually any part of an
organization.
In general, most change interventions involve
organization structure and design, technology and
operations, or people.
The most common areas of change within each of
these broad categories are listed in the Table 18.1.
In addition, many organizations have gone through
massive and comprehensive business process
change programs.
16
Table 18.1 Areas of Organization Change
18
Changing Business Process
Approaches to Reengineering:
Figure 9.3 shows general steps in changing business processes,
or reengineering.
Approaches to Reengineering:
Finally, business process change requires a careful
blend of top-down and bottom-up involvement.
On the one hand, strong leadership is necessary, but too
much involvement by top management can make the
changes seem autocratic.
Similarly, employee participation is also important, but
too little involvement by leaders can undermine the
program's importance and create a sense that top
managers do not care.
22
Organizational Innovation
Innovation
A final element of organization change is
innovation.
Innovation is the managed effort of an organization
to develop new products or services or new uses
for existing products or services.
Innovation is clearly important because, without
new products or services, any organization will fall
behind its competition.
23
Organizational Innovation
The Innovation Process: The organizational innovation process
consists of developing, applying, launching, growing, and managing
the maturity and decline of creative ideas. This process is depicted in
Figure 18.4.
25
Forms of Innovation
Technical innovation
A change in the physical appearance or performance of a product
or service, or the physical processes through which a product or
service is manufactured.
For example, the serial replacement of the vacuum tube with the
transistor, of the transistor with the integrated circuit, and of the
integrated circuit with the microchip has greatly enhanced the
power, ease of use, and speed of operation of a wide variety of
electronic products.
Managerial innovation
A change in the management process by which products and
services are conceived, built, and delivered to customers.
For instance, business process change or reengineering represents
a managerial innovation.
26
Forms of Innovation
Product innovation
A change in the physical characteristics or performance of
existing products or service or the creation of brand-new
products or services.
Sony produces digital camera
Process innovation
A change in the way a product or service is
manufactured, created, or distributed.
The implementation of robotics is a process innovation.
27
The Failure to Innovate
Reasons for Failing to Innovate
Lack of resources: If a firm does not have sufficient money
to fund a program of innovation or does not currently
employ the kinds of employees it needs to be innovative, it
may lag behind in innovation.
Failure to recognize opportunities: If organizations are not
skilled at recognizing and evaluating opportunities, they
may be overly cautious and fail to invest in innovations that
later turn out to be successful for other firms.
Resistance to change: Innovation means giving up old
products and old ways of doing things. These kinds of
changes can be personally difficult for managers and other
members of an organization. Thus, resistance to change28
can slow the innovation process.
Promoting Innovations in Organizations
Three specific ways for promoting innovation
The reward system: The idea is to provide financial and
nonfinancial rewards to people and groups who develop
innovative ideas. Once the members of an organization
understand that they will be rewarded for such activities,
they are more likely to work creatively.
Organizational culture: A well managed culture can
communicate a sense that innovation is valued and will be
rewarded and that occasional failure in the pursuit of new
ideas is not only acceptable but even expected. E.g., firms
such as Apple, Google, Nintendo, Nokia, Sony, Walt
Disney, have strong, innovation-oriented cultures
29
Promoting Innovations in Organizations
Intrapreneurship in larger organizations:
Intrapreneurs are similar to entrepreneurs except that
they develop a new business in the context of a large
organizations.
There are three intrapreneurial roles in large
organizations, such as, the inventor, the product
champion, and the sponsor.
To successfully use intrapreneurship to encourage
creativity and innovation, the organization must find one
or more individuals to perform these roles.
30