Design of Separation Equipment of Heterogeneous Mix
Design of Separation Equipment of Heterogeneous Mix
Design of Separation Equipment of Heterogeneous Mix
Heterogeneous Mixture
Liquid-Solid, and
These separation can be done by exploiting the differences in density between the
phases.
1. Cyclone separator
2. Gas-Liquid separator
3. Liquid-Liquid separator
4. Gravity separator
5. Centrifugal separator
7. Scrubbers
8. Electrostatic precipitator
9. Hydro cyclone
Table given in next slide shows the general field of application of each type in terms of the particle
size separated, the expected separation efficiency, and the throughput.
It can be used to make a preliminary selection of the type of equipment likely to be suitable for a
particular application.
CYCOLNE SEPARATOR :
Cyclone separators provide a method of removing particulate matter from air or other gas
streams at low cost and low maintenance.
Cyclones are basically centrifugal separators, consists of an upper cylindrical part referred
to as the barrel and a lower conical part referred to as cone.
They simply transform the inertia force of gas particle flows to a centrifugal force by means
of a vortex generated in the cyclone body.
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
The collection efficiency of cyclones varies as a function of density, particle size and
cyclone design.
1. gas viscosity
5. gas density
The efficiency of a cyclone collector is related to the pressure drop across the collector.
This is an indirect measure of the energy required to move the gas through the system.
The pressure drop is a function of the inlet velocity and cyclone diameter.
Fig. 3
Cyclone performance :
Particles are driven to the walls by centrifugal forces (an expression for this force is given
below), losing its momentum and falling down to the cyclone leg.
In the lower section, the gas begins to flow radially inwards to the axis and spins upwards to
the gas outlet duct.
(1)
The main variables describing the cyclone performance are pressure drop, efficiency
and cut diameter.
Cut diameter:
The cut diameter of the cyclone is defined as the size of the particles collected with
50% collection efficiency.
1
9 B 2
2Nv
c
d pc (2)
i p
1 Lc
N Lb
H 2
Where,
N = number of turns inside the device (no units)
H = height of inlet duct (m or ft)
Lb = length of cyclone body (m or ft)
Lc = length (vertical) of cyclone cone (m or ft).
Collection efficiency:
The collection or separation efficiency is most properly defined for a given particle
size.
The fractional efficiency equation of Leith and Licht (1973) is given as:
2 C
1
2 n 2
(3)
Ei 1 e
p d p2 vi
n 1 (4)
18Dc
In previous expression, C is a factor that is a function only of the cyclones dimensions. The
symbol expresses characteristics of the particles and gas and is known as inertia or impaction
parameter.
The value of n is dependent on the cyclone diameter and temperature of the gas stream.
A more popular and an older method of calculating cyclone fractional efficiency and overall
efficiency was developed by Lappel (1951).
And it is observed that cyclone efficiency correlates in a general way with this ratio.
1
E 2
d (5)
1 pc
dp
Pressure drop:
Pressure drop across the cyclone is of much importance in a cyclone separator.
The total pressure drop in a cyclone will be due to the entry and exit losses, and friction
and kinetic energy losses in the cyclone.
Normally most significant pressure drop occurs in the body due to swirl and energy
dissipation.
The idea is that having such an equation, one could work back and optimize the design of
new cyclones.
The empirical equation given by Stairmand (1949) can be used to estimate the pressure
drop.
g 2 2rt 2
P u1 1 2 1 2u2
2
203
re
(6)
P = cyclone pressure drop
g = gas density
As = surface area of cyclone exposed to the spinning fluid For design purposes
this can be taken as equal to the surface area of a cylinder with the
same diameter as the cyclone and length equal to the total height of
the cyclone.
A1 = area of inlet duct
Blue arrow indicates the radius rt
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Previous equation is for the gas flowing alone, containing no solids. The presence of solid
will increase the pressure drop over that calculated using following equation ,depending on
the solids loading.
(7)
kc = 1.0 for cyclone vanes that do not expand the entering gas or touch the outer wall
However,
kc = 2.0 for cyclone vanes that expand and touch the outlet all.
Design of Cyclone Separator:
Design procedures for cyclone separators are given by Stairmand (1951),
Stairmand developed two standard designs for gas-solid cyclones:
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Standard cyclone dimensions:
The performance curves for these designs, obtained experimentally under standard test
conditions are,
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Scaling equation, for a given separating efficiency,
1
D Q
3 2
d 2 d1 c 2 1 1 2
Dc1 Q2 2 1 (8)
Where,
2. Obtain an estimate of the particle size distribution of the solids in the stream to be
treated.
4. Calculate the cyclone diameter for an inlet velocity of 15 m/s (50 ft/s). Scale the other
cyclone dimensions from Figures
5. Calculate the scale-up factor for the transposition of Figures 10.45a or 1Q.45&.
7. Calculate the cyclone pressure drop and if required, select a suitable blower.
8. Cost the system and optimize to make the best use of the pressure drop available, or, if a
blower is required, to give the lowest operating cost.
Design a cyclone to recover solids from a process gas stream. The anticipated particle size
distribution in the inlet gas is given below. The density of the particles is 2500 kg/m3, and
the gas is essentially nitrogen at 150C. The stream volumetric flow-rate is 4000 m3/h, and
the operation is at atmospheric pressure. An 80 per cent recovery of the solids is required.
The performance calculations, using this scaling factor and Figure 7 a, are set out in the
table given next slide.
The collection efficiencies shown in column 4 of the table were read from Figure at the scaled
particle size, column 3. The overall collection efficiency satisfies the specified solids recovery.
The proposed design with dimension in the proportions given in Figure 6a is shown in Figure 8
Fig. 8
5