Data Exchange Design and A Textured

State Estimation Algorithm For

Distributed Multi-Utility Operations In
Electric Power Market

Jiansheng Lei

Advisor: Dr. Garng M. Huang

Department of Electrical Engineering

Texas A&M University
 Topics Today

Topic1: An expert system is proposed to search for most

beneficial and efficient data exchange schemes while avoid
harmful data exchange at the same time. In addition, the impact
of data exchange on new measurement design and the issues
on price of exchanged data are also discussed.
Topic2: Based on the data exchange design, a concurrent non-
recursive textured algorithm for distributed multi-utility state
estimation is formulated to avoid the disadvantages of both One
State Estimator (OSE) and existing distributed state estimation
(DSE) algorithms. The newly proposed algorithm is especially
useful for large-scale power systems with multiple independent
existing distributed estimators, such as Mega Regional
Transmission Organizations (Mega-RTOs).

2
 Background (1)

State estimation (SE) is essential for

monitoring, control and optimization of
a power system.
Regardless of the different estimation
algorithms, the locations and types of
measurements are always decisive
factors for successful state estimation.

3
 Background (2)
In the regulated environment, the whole power system is owned
by a limited number of locally monopolistic organizations. There
is almost no need to exchange data with other organizations,
Note: Data mainly refers to both raw instrumentation data and
estimation results.
In a deregulated environment, there are multiple member
companies who must cooperate to run the system and to
achieve their own economic goals. Power companies are
releasing their transmission grids to Whole System
form ISOs/RTOs while their own local Company A
RTO A
state estimators are already in use. ISO A for
Company A&B
RTO B
Company B

4
 Background (3)

A recent trend for these ISOs/RTOs is to further cooperate and

to run the power market on even a bigger grid as a Mega-RTO
for a better market efficiency. The grid of an ISO/RTO could be
large. The size of Mega-RTO is even bigger, as concluded
recently by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FREC) [2]
that only four Mega-RTOs should cover the entire nation beside
Texas.
Whole System
RTO A RTO B
Mega-RTO
RTO C RTO D

5
 Topic1 Data Exchange

How to exchange instrumentation or estimated

data with neighboring entities?
New issues under power market environment
Selected data exchange improves the quality of estimators in
individual entities, on both estimation reliability and accuracy.
Traditional measurement placement methodology need to be
modified to fully utilize the benefit of data exchange.
Not necessarily all data exchanges are beneficial.
Critical to the newly proposed textured distributed state
estimation algorithm in Topic2.

6
Bus Credibility Index BCI(b,S)

Estimation Reliability: bad data detection and identification

capability and probability to maintain observability under
measurement loss
BCI is a probability measure that quantifies the estimation
reliability on bus b with respect to a specified system S.
A more accurate criterion compared with local or global
bus redundancy level
data exchanges modify the original system S to S, and the
incremental difference of BCI from (b,S) to (b,S) stands for
the benefit of such a data exchange on bus b.

7
 Knowledge Base

Raw facts
The configuration, parameters and ownership of current
power system network and measurement system;
The failure probability and accuracy of measurements;
The cost of instrumentation and estimated data exchange;
BCI(b, S)
Variance of State Estimation Errors
Accuracy on bus b with respect to a specific system S

8
 A Reasoning Machine (1)
The distributed state estimation algorithm is
discussed in Topic2. Here the design of data
exchange scheme is the focus. RTO A

An IEEE-14 Bus system is

RTO B
used to illustrate how the
reasoning machine works
Note that the algorithm and
rules are applicable to any
system.
Two RTOs merge into one Mega-RTO

9
 A Reasoning Machine (2)

Step1: Determine maximum possible

benefit on SE reliability performance
BCI (b A ,Whole) BCI (b A , A)
BCI (bB , Whole) BCI (bB , B)

Remark: Only boundary buses are concerned because in most

cases BCI of internal buses also improves with a much smaller
rate when BCI of boundary buses improve.
Step2: Ignore the boundary bus whose
maximum possible benefit is small
10
 A Reasoning Machine (3)

Step3.1: Rules to search for beneficial

Instrumentation data exchange:
For boundary bus bA in A, instrumentation data exchange
should extend to boundary bus bB in B under the condition:
BCI (bB , Whole) BCI (b A , A)
For example, it is reasonable for b2 and b4 in B to extends to
include b1 and b5 in A. But it does not follow the rule that b9 in
B extends to include b10 or b14 in A.
Avoid forming a radial structure; instead, a loop is preferred.
For example, b9 in B extend only to b10 in A will form a new
radial branch b9-b10, which violates this principle.
11
 A Reasoning Machine (4)

Step3.2: Rule to search for beneficial

estimation data exchange:
If BCI(b,A)>BCI(b,B)
where bus b is in the common part of A and B
Then estimation result exchange from A to B on this
bus will improve BCI(b,B) to the magnitude of BCI(b,A)
.

12
 A Reasoning Machine (5)
Step4.1 System A or B are modified accordingly
based on the data exchange newly found.
BCI, estimation accuracy and the economic cost are
evaluated on the new system S to verify the benefit.
If BCI(b,S) are already close to BCI(b,Whole), then
there is no need to search for new data exchange for
bus b.
Step4.2 Searching process is iterated on all
boundary buses.

13
 Economic Factor (1)
Hardware/software cost on data exchange
implementation should be minimized given
the condition that performance is satisfied.
Even if scheme D1 is slightly better than scheme D2 in
performance, but it is still possible for industry to select D1
when D1 is much more economical than D2.
The benefit of different data exchange schemes may differ
greatly. The benefit may saturate after some data exchange,
which implies no major benefit can be obtained for further data
exchange.

14
 Economic Factor (2)
Price tag reflects not only installation
cost but also market value.
It is possible for system A to attach a rather high price tag to a
measurement that is especially useful to system B.

The proposed expert system is critical

for the companies to determine the
market price based on the benefit of
data exchange.
15
 Economic Factor (3)
New measurements can be sold to other
companies
Data exchange will have some impact on
measurement placement decision.
Proposed expert system is useful for the
new measurement placement decision

16
Case1:Harmful Data Exchange (1)
Average BCI on the buses of B
Original B Modified B Whole System
0.9647 0.9643 0.9662
Average Estimation Error on the buses of B
B before data exchange Original B Modified B Whole System
7.7314e-007 8.1738e-007 2.6326e-007

Not following our principles

Data
Exchange SE reliability decreases
SE accuracy decreases
Wasted investment
B after harmful data exchange

17
Case1:Harmful Data Exchange (2)
Normalized Residues For Local Estimator B
Iteration B before data exchange B after harmful data exchange
No. Meas. Max. Residue Meas. Max. Residue
1st 9 164.72 9-4 89.41
2nd 9-7 108.05 7-4 56.78
3rd No bad data detected 4 34.68
4th N/A No bad data detected
Assumption:
9 and 9-7 are bad data, where the sign of measurements are reversed.
No bad data on the exchanged data.
Facts:
Before data exchange these two bad data are identified correctly.
After harmful data exchange these bad data cannot be detected at all.
Estimation result on local estimator area is harmed.

18
Case2: Efficiency of Beneficial
Data Exchange
Average BCI on the buses of B
Estimator A
Original B Modified B Whole
Estimator 0.9647 0.9662 0.9662
B
Average Estimation Error on the buses of B
Overlapping Original B Modified B Whole
Areas 7.7314e-007 2.6471e-007 2.6326e-007

BCI is as good as the whole system

Estimation Accuracy is almost as
good as the whole system
Following our rules lead to high
Local estimators after beneficial data efficient data exchange
exchange

19
 Case3: Impact on New
Measurement Placement (1)
Suppose the probability of accidents in the SCADA
on station of b1 is extremely high
System becomes unobservable and traditionally at
least one new measurement has to be installed.
With data exchange, such a new measurement is
not necessarily needed.
When we follow the data exchange scheme suggested in Case 2,
state estimation in A can be run normally because the estimation
result on b1 and b5 is exchanged from B to A (B is still observable
even under such an accident).

20
 Case4: Impact on New
Measurement Placement (2)
Suppose A wants to improve the estimation
accuracy on b5.
From a traditional measurement placement
viewpoint, there are basically two alternatives:
improve the accuracy on measurement 5-1 or 5-6.
With data exchange, it is better for A to invest on
measurement 5-1 instead of on measurement 5-6.
If the accuracy of 5-1 improves, the accuracy of B also
improves with data exchange in Case2.
It makes sense for B to share part of the cost with A.

21
 Conclusions on Topic1 (1)

Selected data exchange improves the estimator quality of

individual entities on both estimation reliability and accuracy.

Benefit of different data exchange can be quite different:

Properly selected data exchanges will enable the local
distributed estimator perform as well as the one estimator for the
whole system in both SE reliability and accuracy.
Poorly designed data exchanges, which does not follow our
design principles, may be harmful to local estimators.

Data exchange has an impact on new measurement design

22
 Conclusions on Topic1 (2)

Proposed expert system is useful in:

Design of the data exchange scheme
New measurement placement decision
Determination of the market price for date
exchange
Newly proposed distributed SE algorithm

23
 Topic2 State estimation on Mega-RTO

How to avoid the disadvantages of One State Estimator

(OSE) in Mega-RTO?
Huge investment and maintenance cost
Poor performance because of the size of system
Waste of existing local state estimators
How to avoid the disadvantages of existing distributed
state estimation (DSE) algorithm?
Low bad data detection ability
Low estimation accuracy on Whole System
boundary buses RTO A RTO B
Bottleneck issues on central Mega-RTO
controlling node RTO C RTO D

24
 Concurrent Textured DSE Algorithm

Step1. Select a set of real time instrumentation data to be exchanged

between neighboring entities.
Step2. Select a set of estimated data to be exchanged between
neighboring entities.
Step3. Taking the exchanged instrumentation data into account,
multiple local estimators distributed in different entities are executed
simultaneously and asynchronously until they converge individually to
the desired tolerance.
Step4. In view of the exchanged estimated data, modify the
estimation result of local estimators accordingly and re-run bad data
analysis.
Step5. Based on the modified results of local estimators, finally
determine the state of whole system according to the different
accuracy and reliability of estimators.
25
 Advantages Of New Algorithm

Higher bad data detection ability

Higher estimation accuracy on boundary buses
Avoid central controlling node
Faster speed after removal of recursive process from
original textured algorithm
More flexible and economic where current existing
estimators can be fully utilized
The performance of individual existing estimators
improves as well. Accordingly, they are more willing to
share the information for their own benefits even
without the estimation on whole system.
26
 Textured Decomposition
For Step1 and Step 2

Two main rules in Topic1 are proposed to search for

the estimated data/instrumentation exchange.
Poorly designed data exchanges, which did not follow
our design principles, may be harmful to local
estimators.
Properly selected data exchanges will enable the local
distributed estimator performance almost as good as
one estimator on the whole system in both estimation
reliability and estimation accuracy.
Refer to Topic1 for details
27
 Sparse Technique In Step4

Sparse Technique
( A MaN T ) 1 A 1 A1M (a 1 N T A1M ) 1 N T A1
Application
z
h( x) e
z h ( x) e
new new new

xi G T 1

H new Rnew H new ( H T R 1z
1 T
H new 1
Rnew z new )

where the dimension of Rnew is much lower than that of G

( H T R 1 z ) G 1
and are known already
Step 4 is no longer time-consuming
28
 Determination of State Over
The Whole Grid in Step5
Determine the angle difference of reference buses between any
two local estimators:
AB ( i , A i , B )(ci, 1A ci, B1 ) i, A i,B )
( c 1
c 1

iI iI
Select a reference bus of one estimator as global reference bus
Determine the angle difference between this global reference
bus and reference bus of any local estimator:
AC AB BC

Estimated angle of local estimator C is subtracted with AC

For overlapping bus i belonging to multiple local estimators:
m m
xi ( xi ,K j ci,1K j ) ci,1K j
j 1 i 1

29
 Estimation Accuracy and
Boundary Discrepancy
Derivation 0.01 p.u. on meas. 5-2
Estimator A
Estimation accuracy increases
compared with existing DSE while
Data Exchange Area boundary discrepancy decreases
from 0.004 in existing DSE to
0.002 in textured DSE

Table 1. Estimation Result Derivation

Algorithm OSE Existing Textured
Estimator B
DSE DSE
Fig.1 Local estimators 0.003 0.007 0.004
after raw data exchange 2 derivation

30
 Bad Data Detection Ability
Table 2. Normalized Residues For Local Estimator A and B
Or- A in Fig.1 B in Fig.1 A in Fig.1 after estimated
de- data exchange
r
Meas. Max. Meas Max. Meas. Max. Residue
Residue Residue
1 68.95 5-1 87 5-1 84
1
5 59.4 1-5 84 1-5 94
2

Step1. A in Fig.1 is executed and 1 and 5 are identified incorrectly as bad data.
Step2. Simultaneously, B in Fig.1 is executed and 1-5 and 5-1 are both
identified as bad data successfully one by one.
Step3. The corrected values on 1-5 and 5-1 are exchanged from B to A, And
these values are treated in A as pseudo measurements with particular high
accuracy and reliability.
Step4. Taking the new pseudo measurements into account, A modifies its own
estimation result and re-run bad data analysis. This time 1-5 and 5-1 are both
identified successfully as bad data.
31
 Conclusion on Topic2

The determination of state over Mega-RTO becomes very

challenging due to its size. Instead of starting a totally new estimator
over the whole grid, a distributed concurrent textured algorithm is
proposed, where the currently existing state estimators distributed in
different companies/ISOs/RTOs are fully utilized.
The new algorithm is based on some extra communication for some
instrumentation and estimated data exchange, and such an algorithm
is non-recursive, asynchronous and avoids central controlling node.
Therefore, it is fast, flexible and practical.
Performance of each estimator improves greatly via data exchange
when some principles are applied carefully. And the state of whole
system can be determined directly based on the result of current
distributed estimators almost without any loss of accuracy and
reliability compared with integrated SE.
32
 References
[1] Garng M. Huang and S.-C. Hsieh, Fast Textured Algorithms for Optimal
Power Delivery Problems in Deregulated Environments, IEEE Trans. on
Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 493-500, May 1998.
[2] Garng M. Huang and Jiansheng Lei, Measurement Design and State
Estimation for Distributed Multi-Utility Operation, North American Power
Symposium 2001, pp. 504-509, October 2001.
[3] Garng M. Huang and Jiansheng Lei, Measurement Design of Data Exchange
for Distributed Multi-Utility Operation, IEEE PES WM2002, January 2002.
[4] Garng M. Huang and Jiansheng Lei, A Knowledge Based Data Exchange
Design for Distributed Mega-RTO Operations, Probabilistic Methods
Applied to Power Systems 2002, September 2002.
[5] Garng M. Huang and Jiansheng Lei, A Concurrent Non-Recursive Textured
Algorithm for Distributed Multi-Utility State Estimation, IEEE PES SM2002,
July 2002.

33
 Thanks!

Any comments are highly appreciated.

Contact Email: [email protected]

34