RADIOLOGI JURNAL Campur
RADIOLOGI JURNAL Campur
RADIOLOGI JURNAL Campur
Yessa Mandra Y
150070200111024
115070107111058
ABSTRACT
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common clinical syndrome for
which effective treatment depends on a rapid and accurate
diagnosis.
SBO is often diagnosed late or misdiagnosed, resulting in
significant morbidity and mortality.
When an SBO is accompanied by signs of strangulation,
emergent surgical treatment is advised.
If a complete or high-grade obstruction is suspected,
crosssectional studies such as ultrasonography or multidetector
CT are used to exclude strangulation. An algorithmic approach to
imaging is proposed for the management of SBO to achieve
accurate diagnosis of the obstruction; determine its severity,
site, and cause; and assess the presence of strangulation.
Radiologists have a pivotal role in clinical decision making in
cases of SBO by providing answers to specific questions that
significantly affect management.
INTRODUCTION
Common condition secondary to
mechanical or functional obstruction of
small bowel
Preventing normal transit of contents
In Diagnostics
Is the small bowel obstructed?
How severe is the obstruction?
Where is it located?
What is its cause?
Is strangulation present?
Plain Radiography
50-60% accurate
Only sensitive in high obstruction
USG
Rarely used because of air
Adhesion cant be detected with USG
Useful if obstructed segment dilated with
fluid
Contrast Imaging
demonstrate the presence of obstruction in
100% of cases
the level (proximal vs distal) of obstruction in
89% of cases
cause of the obstruction in 86% of surgically
treated patients
CT Scan
Preoperative evaluation of SBO
sensitivity of 90%96%
specificity of 96%
accuracy of 95%.
CT scan
Condition not urgent
Assess severity & cause of obstruction
Sensitivity of 82%100% for high-grade and
complete SBO
Substitute: sonography
CT criteria for
SBO
Plain Abdominal
Radiography
diagnostic in 50%60% of cases
equivocal in about 20%30%
normal,nonspecific, or misleading in 10%20%
Determine need of immediate surgery
Plain Radiography
Differentiate high and small grade SBO
presence of small bowel distention
maximal dilated loops averaging 36 mm in diameter
exceeding 50% of the caliber of the largest visible colon
loop
2.5 times increase in the number of distended loops in
the abdomen compared with the normal number
Finding at Sonography
Bowel obstruction is present when
Lumen of the fluid filled small bowel loops is
dilated to more than 3 cm
Length of the segment is more than 10 cm
Peristalsis of the dilated segment is increased,
as shown by the to-and-fro or whirling motion
of the bowel contents
Finding in Multidetector CT
1. Is the Small Bowel Obstructed?
2. How Severe Is the Obstruction?
3. Where Is the Transition Point?
4. What Is the Cause of the Obstruction?
5. Is the SBO Simple or Complicated?
Intrinsic cause
Bowel lesions are seen at the transition point
and manifest as localized mural thickening.
Extrinsic causes
Adjacent to the transition point and usually
have associated extraintestinal manifestations.
Intraluminal causes
Manifest as endoluminal foreign objects with
imaging characteristics different from those of
the remaining enteric content.
Etiology
Intrinsic Causes of
SBO
Crohn Disease
Neoplasia
Intussusception
Radiation Enteritis
Hematomas
Vascular causes
Adhesions
Hernias
Endometriosis
Gallstone Ileus
Bezoar
Distal Intestinal
Obstruction Syndrome
Other Intraluminal
Causes
Neoplasia
Primary neoplastic rare Fig.12
Metastatic cancer - common
Peritoneal carcinomatosis frequent
Isolated metastases extremely rare
Cecum and colon Fig.13
Intusseption
Rare in adults
Appears in neoplasm, adhesion, foreign
bodies
At CT: bowel-within-bowel with or without
mesenteric fat and vessels pathognomonic
Radiation enteritis
Cause obstruction in the late phase 1 year
after radiation therapy
Because adhesive producing and fibrotic
changes in mesentery
Radiation serositis luminal narrowing and
dysmotility
Hematoma
Secondary causes:
Anticoagulant therapy
Iatrogenic intervention
Trauma
Vascular causes
Occlusion or stenosis bowel ischemia
wall thickening SBO
CT shows thrombosis or occlusion on
messenteric vessel and thickening of the
bowel wall in the affected loop with
noncircumferential or asymmetric wall
enhancement
Adhesion
Main cause SBO
Adhesive bands not
seen at conventional
CT, only an abrupt
change in the caliber
bowel
Hernia
Second most common
cause SBO
Classified according to
the anatomic location
Broadly classified as:
Internal hernia :
diagnosed most always by
radiologic
External hernia : mostly
according to clinical
examination
Endometriosis
typically located on the
antimesenteric edge of
the bowel
Typical appearance: solid
nodule with positive
enhancement contiguous
with or penetrating the
thickened bowel wall
When infiltrates to
submucosa: a
hypoattenuating layer
between the muscularis
and the mucosa
Intraluminar cause of
SBO
A. Gallstone illeus
Rare complication
of recurrent
cholecystitis.
Findings
radiographic triad
of pneumobilia,
ectopic gallstone,
and SBO.
Gallstone
http:// www.eurorad.org/eurorad
2. Bezoar
SBO secondary to a bezoar is rare
At CT, a bezoar appears as an
intraluminal mass with an ovoid
shape and a mottled gas pattern.
radiopaedia.org/articles/be
zoar
3. Distal Intestinal
Obstruction Syndrome
Cause of SBO that usually
occurs in older children and
adults with cystic fibrosis.
The obstruction is secondary to
impaction of thick stool, which
is probably related to
inadequately controlled
intestinal absorption secondary
to pancreatic insufficiency.
Because this condition
responds to medical treatment,
it is important to recognize it.
Findings consist of SBO with
feculent filling defects in the
small bowel.
4. Other Intraluminal
Causes
Intestinal obstruction
caused by a foreign
body usually occurs in
children or in
emotionally disturbed
or mentally disabled
patients.
Findings consist of SBO
with evidence of a
foreign body at the
transition point.
5. SBO
Simple or Complicated?
SBO
Simple
obstuctio
n
Closeloop
obstructi
on
Strangulation
Strangulation: associated with intestinal ischemia.
Seen in approximately 10% patients
mainly when there is a delay in establishing the correct
diagnosis and subsequent surgical treatment.
Spesific finding
lack of wall enhancement
asymmetric enhancement or even
delayed enhancement may also be found.
Conclusions
Historically, Acute SBO was surgically treated
relatively early owing to the difficulty of
confidently excluding -on clinical and imaging
grounds complicated SBO.
Today, with increased evidence that some
obstructions resolve with conservative
management and that the latest modalities of
abdominal imaging allow confident diagnosis,
early surgery is now performed more selectively.
The role of the radiologist as a consultant to the
surgeon is a critical one. Therefore, a full
understanding of which imaging modalities to use,
when to use them, and what imaging findings to
look for to allow an individualized treatment.
THANKYOU