Ray Chapter8 Poverty

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 46

Chapter 8

What

is poverty?

Measuring
Empirical

poverty

facts on poverty

Functional

impact of poverty

Poverty Line

A critical threshold of income, consumption, or access to

goods and services below which individuals are declared


to be poor.

A minimum level of acceptable economic participation

in a society

Consumption or Nutrition-based poverty line

Minimum nutrient levels for an adequate diet (price of food or


consumption of calories)
Cost of shelter (rent) and clothing

Income-based poverty line

Legally declared minimum wage


Arbitrary threshold: say, 60% of mean income in a society

Overall expenditure versus item-by-item


consumption
Should we compare the characteristics of a

consumption basket with a benchmark basket?

Or, should we compare consumption expenditures with a

minimum threshold?

Nutrition levels may not rise with income (demand for canned
foods or fast foods)
Income simply represents the capacity to consume, not
consumption itself

However, income or expenditure-based poverty lines are

easier to use, given constraints imposed by available


data

Absolute

versus Relative Poverty

What is an acceptable level of participation in

a society?

Owning a TV may be deemed socially necessary in one


country, but not another
Similar examples can be motivated for cars, higher
education, leisure, etc
Constituents of a poverty line may vary widely across
countries, making comparisons difficult

Poverty should be evaluated relative to

prevailing socio-economic standards in a


society

Temporary

or Chronic Poverty?

We must be careful to distinguish between

structural or chronic poverty and


temporary poverty
Unanticipated shocks can push people
temporarily below the poverty line (natural
disasters, disease, poor rainfall, etc)
Policies to deal with temporary poverty can be

very different from those required for chronic


poverty

Households or Individuals?
Available expenditure data is often at the household level
Should we divide total household consumption

expenditures by number of individuals in the household?


This gives an idea of average or per-capita expenses

Problems:
Allocation of expenditures within the household are skewed
Discrimination against females and elderly (gender and age
bias)
Large households typically have more children, who consume
less than adults
Fixed costs of setting up or running a household

Poverty

lines are always an


approximation to a very fuzzy
threshold

Sustained

deprivation can be insidious:


effects are often felt at a later point of
time

However,

the poverty line gives us a


starting point to study poverty

Some

notation:

y denotes income or expenditure


Subscripts i, j,, refer to individuals
p denotes the poverty line, converted to

a common currency
For nutrition-based poverty lines, p represents
the money required to attain the minimum
calorie threshold

the mean income in the economy is m

Headcount

(HC): number of people


below the poverty line, i.e., number of
individuals
that
y i such
p
i

Headcount

Ratio (HCR): gives an


idea of the relative incidence of the
poor

HC
HCR
n

where n is the size of the population

Fails

to capture the extent to which


income falls below the poverty line
People near the poverty line are less

poor than those far below it

Can lead to problematic policy decisions:


Policies are systematically biased in favor of
individuals very close to the poverty line,
because they offer the biggest bang for the
buck (politically)

The

PGR is a measure of the average


shortfall of income from the poverty line
How much extra income or consumption, on

average, is required to get ALL poor people


to the poverty line?

PGR

yi p

p y
i

nm

Division by mean income: an idea of how

large the poverty gap is relative to the


resources that must be used to close the
gap

One problem with the PGR:


In societies with high inequality (where
average income is high), the PGR looks
very small even though there may be a lot
of poverty

IGR

yi p

p y
i

An alternative :

Income shortfall is divided by the total


income required to bring all poor people to
the poverty line

pHC

Size of households below the poverty line typically


tend to be larger than the average family size for
the economy

Number of children per family is highly correlated


with poverty
Burden of poverty falls disproportionately on the young
Affects childhood nutrition and education: long-term

consequences for the economy

Women are disproportionately represented as heads


of poor households
Absence of a principal male earner is closely related to

poverty
This trend is widespread in Africa, Latin America, and
South and East Asia

Poverty

in rural areas is significantly


higher than that in urban areas (even after
adjusting for cost of living)

Poverty

is highly correlated with the lack


of ownership of productive assets
Lack of assets leads to poverty
Poverty leads to the sale of assets

Poverty

and small-scale agriculture are


strongly correlated
Bulk of the poor are either landless or near

landless

Most poor reside in the informal sector


Mix of self-employment and low-wage labor

Self employment: Vendors, petty traders, teastall owners, beggars, shoe-shine boys,
garbage-sifters, load carriers, rickshaw pullers,
roadside hawkers, etc.

Wage Labor: often seasonal or casual, not


subject to minimum wage laws

Low levels of human capital


High levels of illiteracy
Lack of access to credit to acquire human capital

Poverty

and undernutrition are closely


correlated, especially among children
Muscle wastage, stunting, illness & infection
Low cognitive skills and capacity to do

productive work in adults

One

issue: increases in income may or


may not have a significant impact on
nutrition
Direct nutrition supplements may have a

greater impact than an increase in income

Why is the relationship between income and


nutrition ambiguous?
Good nourishment is desirable, because of health

and productivity benefits


By contrast, individuals may have preferences for
foods that taste good (meat)
foods that are well advertised (fast foods)
foods that are indicators of social and economic
attainment (canned food, expensive varieties)
These types of food may have little nutritional value

Nutritional elasticity: What is the percentage change


in the consumption of calories when household
budgets change by one percentage point?

Poverty

affects the access that poor


people have to markets
Credit
Labor
Education
Land (for cultivation)

Lack

of access to these markets can


have fundamental consequences for an
economy

The

poor have little or no access to


credit markets
Lack of collateral that can be put up for

loan repayment

In

societies where labor mobility is low,


one form of informal collateral is labor
Can lead to permanent indebtedness

The

poor have limited incentives to


repay loans

Why

do people insure?

What

is needed for successful insurance?

Incident against which insurance is sought must

be
Verifiable
Must not be subject to Moral Hazard

This

is why perfect insurance is never


available
Example: deductibles, contingencies, etc.

Formal

insurance markets often


dont exist in developing countries
because of problems with verifiability
and moral hazard
Example: think of crop failure:
What is the exact degree of crop failure?
Was it due to bad weather or lack of hard
work?

However,

moral hazard problems are


actually small for the poor
Opportunity cost of labor for the poor is low
Poor are unemployed or underemployed to

begin with, so cost of time is low


This permits them to credibly supply more effort
Therefore,

where formal insurance is not


available, informal schemes of insurance
can work (example: shared labor or
resources)

very large proportion of the poor


around the world are also significantly
below adequate standards of nutrition

Effects of undernutrition:
Muscle wastage, retardation, vulnerability

to illness & infection


Lower work capacity
Psychological effects: metal apathy,
depression, lower intellectual capacity, lack
of motivation
Low life expectancy

Energy

food

Input: periodic consumption of

Nutrition meets economics:


Access to food = access to income
For poor, access to income = returns to labor supply
(poor dont have much capital assets)

Resting

Metabolism: energy required to

Maintain body temperature


Sustain heart and respiratory action
Supply minimum energy requirements of

resting tissues

How

much energy is required for


adequate resting metabolism?
FAOs reference man
European male with a weight of 65 kg (143 lbs)
Energy requirement: 1700 Kcal per day

Energy Required for Work:


FAOs reference man requires 400 Kcal per

day for moderate activity.


For the poor who have to work hard in the
fields all day, this is a very conservative
estimate

Some

estimates of energy requirements:

West African agriculture:


213 kcal per hour for carrying a 20 kg log
372 kcal per hour for bush clearing
502 kcal per hour for felling a tree

The

FAOs reference man, a European


male weighing 65 kg, therefore spends
most of his day rather ambiguously
defined, but apparently not working very
hard.

Storage

and Borrowing

Over the short/medium term, energy

deficits/surpluses can be
absorbed/cushioned by the human body
A sustained, long-term deficit in the
bodys energy requirements can have
disastrous consequences
Illness
Incapacitating debility
death

Labor

markets create income and


access to nutrition and good health

Good

nutrition, in turn, affects the


capacity of the body to perform tasks
that generate income

This

circular argument points to the


existence of poverty traps in
developing countries

Low nutrition is capable of creating low incomes reduces


possibilities for good nutrition in the future
This leads to a vicious cycle of poverty

Several questions can be raised in this regard:


Why is the vicious cycle of low nutrition-low income not possible

for the poor in rich countries?

Cant people simply borrow their way out of the vicious cycle?
If work capacity affects future work output, why dont employers

take advantage of this and offer long-term contracts?

If long-term contracts indeed exist for other reasons, then does

this affect nutritional status?

In rich countries, labor markets are tight

Low supply relative to demand


Attractive opportunities in other markets
Labor markets in rich countries are very diversified

In tight labor markets, the returns to labor are,


on average, quite high, even for people with
low work capacity
Example: hourly income for barbers or janitors

This breaks the vicious cycle, as high wages


permit adequate nutrition (even for the poor in
rich countries)

Poor

simply do not have access to


credit markets

There

may not be a way to improve


nutrition for the poor without
redistribution of income from the rich
We have seen before that redistributing

wealth can be both economically and


politically contentious

It

is unlikely that an employer would offer


a long-term contract, just to extract
future gains from work capacity
There is no guarantee that the employee will

keep working for a given employer (he/she


may choose to work for another employer, or
might migrate to another village)
If an employer makes a nutrition-enhancing
investment, the market may bid up the wage
for the employee employee will reap the
entire benefits of the employers investment!

When

nutrition is used by the employer


to build up work capacity of the
employee, there must be separate set
of factors that sustains this contract
Slave economy
Slaves were a valuable commodity, due to intense
competition for their services in the labor market
Slave diets on plantations in the US South
exceeded that for all non-indentured labor in the
19th century

Industry
Positive relationship between nutrition and productivity
Feeding low-paid workers well forces them to consume
a greater proportion of their wages as food

Domestic Servants
Servants are associated with characteristics acquired
on the job that make them costly to replace
The quality of food given to domestic
servants..is..greatly superior to that obtainable by
members of working-class families from which
servants are drawn. (Booth, 1903)

In

poor households, if scarce resources


are equally allocated, then per-capita
resources are very small

This

may limit total household work


capacity

This

fact can cause an unequal sharing


of poverty within the household
Systematic discrimination against some

members of the household


Lifeboat ethic

What types of household members are


discriminated against?
Females (both adults and children)
Old and infirm

Social institutions often form perceptions about


future earning capacities
Female children are seen as a financial burden,

where the institution of dowry exists


Household work of adult females may be nonmonetized and hence not internalized
Wage-earning females who earn less than males
Medical expenses for the old and infirm who have
no future earning potential

You might also like