Chapter Fourteen: Analyzing Strategic Management Cases
Chapter Fourteen: Analyzing Strategic Management Cases
Chapter Fourteen: Analyzing Strategic Management Cases
Analyzing Strategic
Management Cases
Topics
Why?
Steps involved in conducting a case
analysis.
Better decisions from conflict-inducing
discussion techniques
How to get the most out of case
analysis.
Speculate
Speculate
Integrate
Step One
Two
Step
StepThree
Two
Five-forces analysis
Value chain analysis
Contingency frameworks
Financial analysis
What It Measures
Short-term
solvency, or
liquidity, ratios:
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Cash ratio
What It Measures
Long-term
solvency, or
financial
leverage, ratios:
What It Measures
Asset
utilization, or
turnover,
ratios:
Inventory turnover How many times each year a company sells its entire
inventory.
Days sales in
How many days on average inventory is on hand before it
inventory
is sold.
Receivables
How frequently each year a company collects on its credit
turnover
sales.
Days sales in
How many days on average it takes to collect on credit
receivables
sales (average collection period).
Total asset
How much of sales is generated for every dollar in assets.
turnover
Capital intensity
The dollar investment in assets needed to generate $1 in
sales.
What It Measures
Profitability
ratios:
Profit margin
Return on assets
(ROA)
Return on equity
(ROE)
Market value
ratios:
Price-earnings
ratio
Market-to-book
ratio
Step
Step Three
Four
without judging
Evaluate alternatives
Step
Step Four
Five
Description
Emphasize
strategic analysis
Description
Be logical and Rambling presentations are hard to follow, may confuse the
listener, and fail to evoke a good discussion. Present
consistent
Defend your
position
Share presentation
responsibilities
Dialectical
Inquiry
Groupthink
Use conflict-inducing decision-making techniques to
help prevent groupthink and lead to better decisions.
Groupthink
Symptoms
Illusion of invulnerability
Belief in the inherent morality of
the group
Stereotyped views of members of
opposing groups
Application of pressure to
members who express doubts
about the groups shared allusions
or question the validity of
arguments proposed
Practice of self-censorship
Appointment of mindguards
Groupthink
Preventing groupthink
Leaders must encourage group
members to address concerns and
objectives
Leaders should adopt impartial stance
Leader should encourage members to
discuss deliberations with trusted
associates and report perspectives back
to group
Invite outside experts, challenge
groups viewpoints and positions
Divide into subgroups, meet at different
times, reconvene to resolve differences
Hold a second chance meeting
Devils
Advocacy
Devils advocacy
One of the groups (or members)
acts as a critic to the plan
Devils advocate comes up with
problems of the proposed
alternative and suggests reasons
for not adopting it
Forces the group to take a hard
look at its proposed solution
Can be demoralizing
May not lead to better suggestions
Devils
Advocacy
Dialectical
Inquiry
Dialectical inquiry
Identify proposal and
information used to derive it
State underlying assumptions
Identify counter plan (antithesis)
Engage in debate
Identify a synthesis (best
components of each alternative)
Can be very time consuming
May result in undesirable
compromises (original solution
was better)