Pricing in Fashion
Pricing in Fashion
Pricing in Fashion
Customers
The framework
To explain the concept behind pricing and how fashion businesses use it as both a strategic
tool and a tactical element within the marketing mix.
The principal aims of fashion retail pricing are to optimize sales revenues, maximize profits,
provide value to consumers and reflect the brand positioning of the fashion business.
Price refers to the amount of money that a customer (B2B, B2C or C2C) is willing to pay for
a product or service. In this sense price is directly linked to value. The price paid by an enduser consumer for a product is known as the Retail Selling Price (RSP).
Fashion products are normally full-price during the season and then gradually marked down
or reduced if they do not sell.
Fast-fashion encourages fashion retailers to clear stock as they go, to make way for new
product ranges. Consequently, the pressure to achieve sales targets quickly means that
stock can be sold or marked down during mid-season or, failing that, cleared as terminal
stock in the seasonal sales.
Some online and catalogue retailers adjust their RSP according to demand. This results in a
smoother and less dramatic use of mark-down when clearing slower-selling products.
An exception to stock entering the retail business at anything other than full price is special
purchase stock, normally slow-selling brands or manufacturers lines. This normally refers
to products or lines that are bought by fashion retailers specifically for the annual sales. It is
common for such stock to supplement the current seasons ranges to boost the amount of
stock trading in the sale period.
The framework
The word price and cost are sometimes interchangeable in business, as companies
negotiate prices among themselves.
For example a fashion retail buyer from a brand such as Top Shop will pay a cost price (CP)
for fashion products that they have ordered from suppliers. The price will obviously be a
selling price from the perspective of the supplier. The CP paid by Top Shop will have a
mark-up (or profit) added to achieve its RSP. The notion of the RSP value as perceived by
Top Shops consumers will be influenced by the benefits that are built into the product by
both the supplier (e.g. product quality and design) and Top Shop (e.g. the status of the
brand).
In 2006, Stuart Rose, the CEO of M&S, explained his success in improving the fortunes of
the company by quoting a formula: price x quality = value. Price is a clear and tangible
criterion for consumers to evaluate. Quality is also tangible but many consumers are willing
to trade quality for a lower price so long as the product achieves a minimum performance
and standard of manufacture.
Consumers have different priorities, experiences and reference points, and each perceives
value very differently. Understanding why some consumers are prepared to spend several
thousand rupees for top-end, branded jeans, whilst others make do with a pair for Rs. 200
from a mass market, is an essential element of all fashion organisations ongoing consumer
research. Aldo Gucci, the son of the founder Guccio Gucci, observed, Quality is
remembered long after price is forgotten and this is the ultimate truism of all good fashionmarketing management.
The breadth and depth of product lines and the price relationships between items in
those lines are factors that must be considered when setting prices. A warm lining for a
raincoat sold separately will need to be assessed not only in terms of individual cost,
but also for the impact it has upon the total demand and profitability of the raincoat and
lining together for export/demand for the cold countries.
2.
3.
4.
Discounts
5.
Break-even calculations
wedding gowns, or where there are many small independent retailers supplying
the market.
Cost-plus pricing is also used with tender proposals, for instance, when a clothing
price. If the retailer is determined to clear stock, but not to sell below the cost of
any item, then the lowest sale price will be 6.70 plus VAT. If the retailer sells at
VAT exclusive prices of between 6.70 and below 11.06 then the technique of
contribution analysis is being applied.
Contribution analysis is a variant of cost-plus pricing and works on the idea that
any excess of price over cost enables a contribution to be made to the cost of
capital to run the business simply put, some profit is better than no profit.
Clearly, the whole of a companys pricing cannot be based on covering costs
alone, as fashion companies need to do more in order to survive and grow. More
sophisticated variants of contribution analysis can be used to link price setting to
several financial ratios.
awareness levels.
For example, market research may indicate that buyers in a certain target
market may respond very favourably to a hooded top made of cotton jersey,
if the item is priced at 12.99 (including VAT).
If the retailer enjoys considerable purchasing power then the retail price of
12.99 can be used as a base to determine target buying prices for the
retailer. The example in Table 7.2 shows how with a starting price of 12.99
the target retailer buying price or manufacturer selling price is determined.
Similarly, the manufacturer may then use the selling price of 3.87 as a
3. A comparison
markdowns
of
markups
and
Here a markup on cost of 25% is the same as a markdown on selling price of 20%.
Similarly a markdown on selling price of 66.7% is equivalent to a markup on cost of 200%.
Sometimes fashion retailers use a simple formula to calculate a retail selling price, including
VAT, given a particular quotation from a manufacturer. The retailer wanting a markup of
120% and knowing that VAT is charged at 17.5% may simply multiply the quoted cost price,
excluding VAT, by 1.375 to arrive at a tax inclusive retail selling price.
4. Discounts
For the manufacturer, selling large quantities to fewer buyers means lower
wholesalers and will press within negotiations for the largest quantity
discounts possible.
Variations on the simple quantity discount are the cumulative and non-
should the buyer purchase certain minimum quantities over a fixed period,
say one year.
This extra discount may then become available as a rebate or credit
5. Break-even calculations
A central concern of marketing personnel in the fashion industry is balancing the
relationship between price and volume. For example, a clothing manufacturer may
manufacture 20,000 skirts and wish to know how many must be sold to cover
costs. In other words, at what point will the manufacturer break even and begin to
earn profits?
The first example assumes the manufacturer is in a relationship where prices are
fixed by fierce competitive pressures and tough negotiating from retail buyers.
Alternatively, a designer who owns a retail outlet may have considerable discretion
over price levels, but wonder about the profitability of the different volumes that
could be sold at different prices.
Break-even analysis can show the relationship between fixed costs, variable or
for manufacturing.
If these variations can be set aside, then a simple technique that can give a fairly
some examples are the amount of material used, the direct labour costs in pattern
cutting, making up and tailoring, and packaging costs.
Total costs are the sum of fixed costs plus variable cost per unit multiplied by the
output or volume.
Sales revenue is simply price multiplied by volume sold.
In practice, the price taken for the calculations is one that is exclusive of VAT.
When revenue is less than total costs, a loss (or negative profit) will result while
At the break-even point, no profit is earned and all costs are covered by sales
revenue. Hence
or
equations where
FC = Fixed costs
VC = Variable cost per unit
V = Volume
P = Price
(P x
Or,
Or,
Or,
V) = FC + (VC x V)
(P x V) - (VC x V) = FC
V x (P - VC) = FC
V = FC / (P - VC)
If we wished to know the minimum price at which all the output was sold
and covered all costs, i.e. the break-even price point, the formula is
calculated as follows:
(P x V) = FC + (VC x V)
Or, P = (FC / V) + VC
The value given here for price is the minimum that must be charged if the
entire volume is sold and no profit is earned. In practice, a seller would
wish to charge higher prices and earn some profit. The formula does at
This strategy is to charge high initial prices and then only reduce them gradually, if at all. A
skimming price policy is a form of price discrimination over time and several conditions must be
met for it to be effective .
First, the demand for the garments must be relatively inelastic. Inelastic demand only really exists
for essential items that are in short supply or items that have a degree of exclusivity and a
significant number of buyers who are relatively unconcerned about price. A limited edition luxury
handbag by Furla would be an example of such an item. For the supplier the unit costs of
producing a small volume must not be too high.
Finally, the high-profit margins on each item in a skimming policy will attract competitors unless the
seller can protect the garments from being copied. Such a situation usually applies to haute
couture and to a lesser degree to designer ready-to-wear ranges.
Market penetration
This strategy is the opposite of market skimming and aims to try to capture a large market share
by charging low prices.
The low prices charged stimulate purchases and can discourage competitors from entering the
market as the profit margins per item are low.
To be effective this policy relies upon considerable economies of scale in either manufacture or
retailing or both. It also depends upon potential customers being price sensitive about the
particular item and perhaps not perceiving much difference between brands.
maintaining the loyalty of other parts of the distribution chain. Aiming for stable
prices while recognizing the traditional margins in the channels of distribution are
the characteristics of the marketing activities of many fashion marketing
companies.
Price leaders and followers
In the case of the follower, the firm identifies a target market and sets prices in line with
competitors who are serving the same market. A firm with limited marketing resources may simply
shadow a competitor.
Within fashion retailing it is quite common for sales assistants to visit other stores to monitor the
price points for garments and accessories. Monitoring the competition is an essential part of any
market research, but copying ones rivals actions without a clear long-term goal is another matter.
The leader in such a situation is usually the firm with the lowest costs and best profit margins.
Followers hope to avoid a price war by stressing non-price aspects of competition such as a
higher customer service level.
Overt or covert price fixing by sellers is illegal in most of the countries unless a defence can be
made that such action is not against the public interest.
Manufacturers are sometimes able to use pressure relating to the supply or withholding of
products or financial incentives to exert influence over retail prices and effectively inhibit
competition.
The EU has an aim of free movement of goods within and between the member states and the
intense competition within the fashion market works strongly against price fixing tendencies.
However, in 1993, the French perfume industry was able to claim a victory in the European Court
by winning the right to exclusive distribution of perfumes, thereby protecting the margins of outlets
against the so-called grey imports.
In 2001, the battle over exclusivity and free competition in the setting of prices continued with a
legal case between Tesco, the supermarket group, and Levis Strauss over the distribution and
pricing of jeans in the UK with Levi Strauss winning the case for exclusive distribution.
However, there are strong pressures with the EU to review legislation in line with WTO principles
of free trade.
The role of online purchasing in international trade is another factor that is undermining the ability
of retailers to control prices via exclusive distribution.
Price changes
Much damage to customer goodwill can be done by lack of care in announcing price
changes. Given the practices of a minority of unscrupulous retailers, many consumers
approach sales with a healthy degree of scepticism.
Thus care is needed to avoid a small oversight being construed as a deliberate
attempt to mislead.
Summary