Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 56 views

    Alt Proj Delivery 4-10

    Uploaded by

    aialosangeles
    This document discusses alternative project delivery methods for construction projects. It provides a history of construction practices from the early 20th century to present day, including a shift from adversarial approaches to more collaborative methods. New technologies like BIM have also changed the industry. The document analyzes the pros and cons of different delivery methods like Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build. It shows how Design-Build has provided benefits for the Los Angeles Community College District, including lower costs. An emerging integrated project delivery method is also introduced. Current Design-Build projects within the LACCD are highlighted.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Alt Proj Delivery 4-10

    Uploaded by

    aialosangeles
    56 views25 pages
    This document discusses alternative project delivery methods for construction projects. It provides a history of construction practices from the early 20th century to present day, including a shift from adversarial approaches to more collaborative methods. New technologies like BIM have also changed the industry. The document analyzes the pros and cons of different delivery methods like Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build. It shows how Design-Build has provided benefits for the Los Angeles Community College District, including lower costs. An emerging integrated project delivery method is also introduced. Current Design-Build projects within the LACCD are highlighted.

    Original Description:

    Larry Eisenberg's Presentation.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses alternative project delivery methods for construction projects. It provides a history of construction practices from the early 20th century to present day, including a shift from adversarial approaches to more collaborative methods. New technologies like BIM have also changed the industry. The document analyzes the pros and cons of different delivery methods like Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build. It shows how Design-Build has provided benefits for the Los Angeles Community College District, including lower costs. An emerging integrated project delivery method is also introduced. Current Design-Build projects within the LACCD are highlighted.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    56 views25 pages

    Alt Proj Delivery 4-10

    Uploaded by

    aialosangeles
    This document discusses alternative project delivery methods for construction projects. It provides a history of construction practices from the early 20th century to present day, including a shift from adversarial approaches to more collaborative methods. New technologies like BIM have also changed the industry. The document analyzes the pros and cons of different delivery methods like Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build. It shows how Design-Build has provided benefits for the Los Angeles Community College District, including lower costs. An emerging integrated project delivery method is also introduced. Current Design-Build projects within the LACCD are highlighted.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 25

    Alternate Project

    Delivery
    Opportunities

    April 21, 2010


    Master Builder

    2
    Early 20th Century
     Craft Talent
     Collaboration
     General Contractor

    LACC Life Sciences Building LACC NE Van De Kamps

    3
    The 60s

     Time and the


    Handshake

    Aerial views of East Los Angeles College


    4
    70s and 80s
     Adversarial
     Regulation
     Craft Talent
     Building Systems
     User’s Requirements

    Edison Center for the Arts /ELAC auditorium (left) Mural by Roberto Chavez in 1970’s (right)
    5
    The 90s and Present

     Stop the Conflicts


     Design-Build
     Construction
    Management

    6
    Technological Revolution

     Communication
     Design
     Construction

    7
    Technological Revolution:
    Construction
    Sustainability
    Materials and Techniques
    Code Requirements

    8
    Technological Revolution:
    Building Information
     3D Models Modeling (BIM)
     Lines vs. Objects

     Material Lists
     Cost Estimating
     Personnel Scheduling
     Funding Schedules
     Clash Detection

    9
    BIM Storm

     BIM
     Brain Storming
     Design Charrettes

    10
    Back to the Master Builder

     Eliminate Conflicts
     Changes in Design
    and Construction
    Technology
     Fluid Changes in
    Owners Needs

    11
    Project Delivery Methods
    Design Bid Build Design Build

    O O
    CPM
    CPM DB
    A/E B A/E B

    CPM-At Risk CPM-Advisor

    O
    O

    A/E CPM
    A/E CM

    Sub-contractors
    Sub-contractors
    12
    LACCD Project Delivery Methods

    Design Bid Build Design Build

    Owner Owner

    CPM
    DB
    CPM

    A/E Builder A/E Builder

    13
    Owner
    Design Bid Build Delivery Process
    O

    CPM
    A/E B

    A/E Team Schematic Design


    Need Programming
    Selection Design Development

    Construction DSA
    Bidding Construction Occupancy
    Documents Approval

    14
    Design Bid Build
    O

    PROS: CPM
    B
     Independent A/E A/E

     Low Bid Focus


     Owner: Maximum Design Control

    CONS:
     Lengthy Linear Process
     No Pre-Qualification of Builder
     Extensive finger pointing
     No constructability input by Builders
     Owner: Maximum Design Risk

    15
    Design Build Delivery Process
    O
    Design Build Delivery Process
    CPM
    DB
    A/E B

    Programming
    Programming Design Build
    Need & RFP
    A/E Team Competition
    Criteria
    Selection

    Design/
    Design Build
    Construction DSA
    Team Construction Occupancy
    Document Approval
    Selection
    Completion

    16
    Design Build
    O
    CPM
    DB
    A/E B
    PROS:
     Single Sources of Responsibility
     Pre-Qualification of ENTIRE Team
     Constructability Input by Builders

    CONS:
     Independence of A/E Team

    17
    Current Design Build Process Results

     Schematic Design/ Design Development


     Fixed Price
    –Design Fees
    –Construction Costs
    –Builder’s Fees
     RFP Issuance to Award: 100 – 120 Days

    18
    Construction Cost Comparison

    WLAC Parking Structure #8 9/6/07 DBB $83.14/sq.ft.


    Harbor Parking Structure 1/14/09 DB $81.50/sq.ft.

    Harbor FMO 4/20/06 DBB $342.51/sq.ft.


    Pierce FMO 8/6/09 DB $269.27/sq.ft.

    Trade Tech South Campus 3/22/07 DBB $658.01/sq.ft.


    Mission East Campus 1/14/09 DB $646.71/sq.ft.

    19
    Back to the Master Builder Team

    20
    Integrated Project Delivery

     Partnered process
     All participants
    –A / E
    – Contractor
    – Subcontractor
    – Suppliers
    – Owners
     Open book
     Shared savings

    21
    LACC Student Union

    22
    Current Design Build Projects

    LASC Student Services Center WLAC Athletic Campus

    LAHC Science Complex

    23
    LAPC Facilities Maintenance & Operations
    Current Design Build Projects

    LASC Student Services Center LACC Student Union

    LAMC East Campus

    WLAC Watson Center 24


    Questions ?

    25

    You might also like