Die Material
Die Material
Die Material
Presented by
Pragati sharma
Guided By :
Dr Ashistaru Saha
Dr Tushar Tanwani
Dr Pranay Mahaseth
Dr Anupam Purwar
Dr Ankita Piplani
1
CONTENTS
Introduction
Definitions
Ideal
References
GYPSUM-
TYPE IV AND
TYPE V
Auto-polymerizing acrylic
2.
3.
CEMENT SILICOPHOSPHATE
FLEXIBLE DIE MATERIAL
4.
5.
CERAMIC DIES
ELECTROPLATED DIES
6.
SILVER PLATED
COPPER PLATED
AMALGAM
7
NONMETALLIC
1. ELECTROPLATED DIES
SILVER PLATED
COPPER PLATED
2. AMALGAM
10
DIE STONE
11
12
13
Commercial
available
gypsum
investment
material
Colloidal
silica
Entire
assembly = die
+pattern
invested in
divestment
Die is
made
Wax
pattern is
fabricated
14
15
RESINS
16
COMPOSITION:
2 component system
RESIN
HARDENER (Polyamine)
Working time 15mins
Setting time is 1-12 hours
17
Advantage:
1. abrasion resistance >>gypsum.
2. High strength
Disadvantage:
1.More expensive
2.Undergoes some shrinkage during
polymerization.
3. time consuming complex procedure.
4. not compatible with polysulfide or
hydrocolloid.
18
PROPERTY
GYPSUM
EPOXY
Good
Ease of use
Easy
Moderately difficult
Time required
Minimal
Several hours
Minimal
Harmful chemicals
Some (allergy)
None
Compatibility with
Excellent
impression materials
Limited
contraction
Accuracy
Good
Good
19
Auto-polymerising acrylic
heat of reaction.
20
Powder ZnO
MgO-10%
b)
21
Advantages :
Harder than die stone
Disadvantage
Shrinkage on setting
brittle material
22
Application
provisional restorations
Advantages
23
24
25
CERAMIC DIES:
Two
ceramic
available :
die
materials
are
Properties:
* Extremely abrasion resistant;
* Some shrinkage on firing.
Application :
The production of dies for porcelain
inlays, onlays and veneers.
27
AMALGAM :
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
29
ELECTROPLATED DIES
Jacobe in 1934 first used it and
Wajna in 1937 applied it in dentistry.
copper-plated compound dies began
followed by the
Silver-plated dies
30
High strength
Hardness and
Abrasion resistance
31
CU PLATED DIES
- 200gms
- 30ml
- 2ml
- 1000ml
32
Ag PLATED DIES
- 36gm
- 60gm
- 45gm
-1000ml
33
ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS
C
B
A
A
B
C
Impression (cathode)
Silver bar (anode)
DC power supply
34
METALLIZING
Cathod wire is inserted in
the
metallized area of the
impression
35
Impression is connected to
electrical source and submerged
in plating solution
36
Electroplated impression
Silverplated cast
37
Impression material
Gypsum product
Compound
Zinc oxide eugenol
hydrocolloids,
Polysulfide rubber base
Silicone (all types) rubber base
Polyether rubber base.
Electroplated copper
Compound
Silicone (addition) rubber base.
Electroplated silver
Epoxy resin
All except
materials.
polyether,
aqueous
impression
38
All
gypsum
products
expanded,
whereas the epoxy resin material
contracted during setting.
The epoxy resin exhibited much better
detail reproduction, abrasion resistance
and transverse strength than the gypsum
materials.
40
Conclusion
Advantages
Disadvantage Recommended
s
use
Precautions
ADA
1)Dimensional
type IV accuracy
stone
2)Straight forward
technique
3)Low cost
1)Will be
Most situations
damaged if not
handled
carefully
2)Lower
abrasion
resistance
1)Accurate
proportioning
essential
2) Vacuum
mix
recommended
ADA
type V
stone
1) Increased
expansion
1)Accurate
proportioning
essential
2)Vacuum mix
recommended
1) Straight forward
technique
2) Low cost
3)Harder than type IV
Most situations
41
Advantages
Epoxy
resin
1) High strength
2) Good
abrasion
resistance
Disadvantages
Recommende
d use
Precaution
s
1) Polymerization
shrinkage
Complete
ceramic
2) Time consuming crowns
complex procedure
Not
compatible
with
polysulfide
and
hydrocolloi
d
Silver uses
toxic
cyanide.
Incompatibl
e with many
impression
materials.
42
43
REFERENCES
1.Restorative dental materials Robert, G. Craig and John H.
Powers, 12th Edition.
2.Anusavice - Phillips Sciences of Dental materials, 11th Edition.
3.Contemporary fixed prosthodontics Stephen F. Rosenstiel
3rd Edition.
4.JPD 1998 Oct; Vol 80 No. 4 pp: 485-9.
5.JPD 2000 Mar; Vol 83 No. 3 pp: 301-5.
6. Compatibility of Type IV Dental Stones with polysulfide
Impression Materials Journal of Prosthodontics,Vol I, No 1
(September),1992:pp 32-36
44