AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design
AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design
AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design
Pavement performance
Traffic
Roadbed soils (subgrade material)
Materials of construction
Environment
Drainage
Reliability
Pavement performance
Structural Cracking, faulting, raveling, etc.
Functional Riding comfort (measured in terms of
roughness of pavement.)
Serviceability Performance: Measured by PSI Present
Serviceability Index with scale 0 to 5.
5 Just constructed
PSI
0 Road closed
Traffic
In the AASHTO flexible pavement design, traffic is considered in terms of
ESAL for the terminal PSI (Table 20.13 for pt = 2.5.)
You must assume the structural number of the pavement. So, you must
check if the final SN3 is similar to the assumed SN. Higher SN means stronger
pavement, thus the impact of traffic on pavement deteriorations is less.
Structural number of
the subbase, a3
Structural number of
the base course, a2
0.44
Structural number of
the AC surface, a1
= Resilient modulus, Mr
Step 1
Environment
Temperature and rainfall
affect the level of strength of the
subgrade, reflected on the value
of resilient modulus. AASHTO
developed a chart that helps you
to estimate the effective roadbed
soil resilient modulus using the
serviceability criteria (in terms
of relative damage, uf.)
Step 2
Step 3
Drainage
The effect of drainage on the performance of flexible pavements
is considered with respect to the effect water has on the strength of
the base material and roadbed soil.
This effect is expressed by the drainage coefficient, mi. This
value is dependent on the drainage quality and the percent of time
pavement structure is exposed to moisture levels approaching
saturation.
Step 1
Time required to
drain the
base/subbase layer to
50% saturation.
If Fair and 30%
exposure, then mi
is 0.80.
Step 2
Reliability
The reliability factor (FR) is computed using:
The Reliability design level (R%), which determine assurance levels that
the pavement section designed using the procedure will survive for its
design period (it is a z-score from the standard normal distribution
the standard deviation (So) that accounts for the chance variation in the
traffic forecast and the chance variation in actual pavement performance
for a given design period traffic, W18.
log10 FR Z R S o
Survive
pavements
Rigid
pavements
0.30-0.40
Structural design
The object of the design using the AASHTO method is to determine a flexible
pavement SN adequate to carry the projected design ESAL.
The method discussed in the text (Example 20-8) applies to ESALs greater
than 50,000 for the performance period. The design for ESALs less than this is
usually considered under low-volume roads.
log10 W18 Z R S o 9.36 log10 SN 1 0.20
log10 PSI /( 4.2 1.5)
0.40 1094 /( SN 1)5.19
2.32 log10 M r 8.07
Where,
SN a1 D1 a2 D2 m2 a3 D3 m3
ESAL is an estimated value. It may actually more or less. In the design formula,
however, the ESAL value is set to a constant. Then to make sure the pavement survive,
you have to have a thicker one than the thickness that the estimated ESAL requires. To
make that happen in the design formula, we need to subtract a value from the RHS.
Hence, the reliability factor must be negative. The only way to make ZRSo smaller is to
have a negative value of Z because S is always positive.
SN1= 2.6
SN3= 4.4
This line has nothing to do
with Example 20-8.
SN2= 3.8
SN1 a1 D1
Proceed in
this direction
SN 2 a1 D1 a2 D2 m2
SN 3 a1 D1 a2 D2 m2 a3 D3 m3
Use Fig.20.15 for a3, Fig.20.16 for a2, Fig.20.17 for a3, and Tab. 20.14 and
20.15 m2 and m3. Find the depth that results in a SN value close to the SN
value obtained from Fig. 20.20.
Example 20-8
Given:
Parameter values:
ESAL = 2 x 106