Lipsey PPT Ch01
Lipsey PPT Ch01
Lipsey PPT Ch01
Chapter 1
LIPSEY & CHRYSTAL
ECONOMICS 12e
Learning Outcomes
Modern market economy uses price signals to
solve the complex problems involved in using
resources to produce goods and services that
people want.
The choice between competing demands for
scarce resources.
Learning Outcomes
Interaction between production, employment, and
consumption decisions.
Market economy generally delivers outcomes
desired by consumers.
Governments step in when markets fail to
produce results that are regarded as successful.
A Production-Possibility Boundary
Unattainable combinations
Production possibility
boundary
Attainable
combinations
A Production-Possibility Boundary
c0
Unattainable combinations
Production possibility
boundary
Attainable
combinations
g0
Quantity of public sector goods
A Production-Possibility Boundary
c0
Unattainable combinations
d
Production possibility
boundary
Attainable
combinations
b
c1
c
g0
g1
A Production-Possibility Boundary
c0
Unattainable combinations
Production possibility
boundary
C
Attainable
combinations
b
c1
c
g0
g1
A production-possibility boundary
The quantity of public sector goods produced is measured along the
horizontal axis.
The quantity of private sector goods is measured along the vertical
axis.
Any point on the diagram indicates some amount of each kind of
good produced.
The production-possibility boundary separates the attainable
combinations, such as a, b, and c, from unattainable combinations,
such as d.
Points a and b represent efficient uses of societys resources.
Point c represents either an inefficient use of resources or a failure
to use all the resources that are available.
A production-possibility boundary
The boundary is negatively sloped because in a fully employed
economy more of one good can be produced only if resources are
freed by producing less of other goods.
Moving from point a (with coordinates c0 and g0) to point b (with
coordinates c1 and g1) implies producing an additional amount of
public sector goods, indicated by G in the figure
The opportunity cost of this increase in G is a reduction in private
sector goods by the amount indicated by C.
Production possibility
boundary before growth
a
d
Production possibility
boundary before growth
0
Quantity of public sector goods
Production possibility
boundary after growth
Goods Market
sa
oo d
nd
ser
vic
es
Individuals
(consumers)
Fa
ct
Firms
(producers)
or
serv
Factor Market
ices
n
me
y
a
P
or
ts f
d
G oo
Goods Market
d
s an
go o
ds a
nd
Ser
v
ser
vic
es
Individuals
(consumers)
Fa
ct
Pay
me
nt
i ces
Firms
(producers)
or
s fo
ic
serv
Factor
Market
es
Serv
r
o
t
fac
ices
Absolute Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
10
Peter
Jane
Total
Absolute Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
10
Suits
Peter
50
20
200
250
25
Jane
Total
Absolute Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
10
Suits
Full Specialization
Sweaters
Suits
Peter
50
20
40
200
400
250
25
400
40
Jane
Total
Absolute advantage
The first columns show that, working full time on his own,
Peter can produce either 100 sweaters or 40 suits per year,
whereas Jane can produce 400 sweaters or 10 suits.
Thus Jane has an absolute advantage in producing sweaters
and Jacob has an absolute advantage in producing suits.
The second columns show the outputs if they both spend
half their time producing each commodity.
The third columns show the results when Peter specializes in
suits, producing 40 of them, and Jane specializes in
sweaters, producing 400.
Sweaters production rises from 250 to 400, while suits
production goes from 25 to 40.
Comparative Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
48
Peter
Jane
Total
Comparative Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
48
Suits
Peter
50
20
200
24
250
44
Jane
Total
Comparative Advantage
Time spent fully
producing one
or the other
Sweaters
Suits
either
or
100
40
either
or
400
48
Suits
Full Specialization
Sweaters
Suits
Peter
50
20
40
200
24
300
12
250
44
300
52
Jane
Total
Comparative advantage
The first columns in the table show that Jane is more productive than
Peter in both suits and sweaters.
Compared with Peter, Jane is 400 per cent more efficient at producing
sweaters and 20 per cent more efficient at producing suits.
The second columns give the outputs when Peter and Jane each
divide their time equally between the two products.
It is possible to increase the combined production of both
commodities by having Jane increase her production of sweaters and
Peter increase his production of suits.
The third column gives an example in which Peter specializes fully in
suits production and Jane spends 25 per cent of her time on suits and
75 per cent on sweaters.
Total production of sweaters rises from 250 to 300, while total
production of suits goes from 44 to 52.
Comparative advantage
This example is only an illustration. The principles
can be generalized in the following way.
Absolute efficiencies are not necessary for there to be
gains from specialization.
Gains from specialization occur whenever there are
differences in the margin of advantage one producer
enjoys over another in various lines of production.