Quantum Search Algorithms For Multiple Solution Problems: EECS 598 Class Presentation Manoj Rajagopalan

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Quantum Search Algorithms for

Multiple Solution Problems

EECS 598 Class Presentation


Manoj Rajagopalan

Outline
1. Recap of Grovers algorithm for the unique solution case

2. Grovers algorithm for multiple solutions: multiplicity


known
3. Quantum search algorithm for multiple solutions:
multiplicity unknown
4. Quantum counting to determine multiplicity

References
1. Quantum Computing and Quantum Information textbook

2. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database


search, LK Grover, 1996
3. Tight bounds on quantum searching, M Boyer, G
Brassard, P Hoyer, 1996
4. Quantum counting, G Brassard, P Hoyer, A Tapp, 1998

Notation
1. n = # qubits in the system

2. N = # of possible values of n qubits = 2n


3. M = multiplicity of solution
4. k = probability amplitude of system in solution state

5. l = probability amplitude of system in non-solution state


6. A = set of indices that denote solutions (good states)
7. B = set of indices denoting bad states
8. = rotation angle corresponding to Grover operator

Grovers Algorithm for Unique Solution Case


Given F:{0,1}n {0,1}, find i0 F(i0)=1 and i i0 F(i)=0
1. Set up initial state |0 n

2. Apply the Hadamard transform


Hn |0 | =

1
N 1/ 2

Let i0 be the solution:

i
i 0

| = k |i0 +

l
j i 0

3. Grover operator made of 4 steps

Apply the oracle

Apply Hn

Conditional phase shift:

Apply Hn

x
(1) x 0 x

Unique Solution Case Recap (contd)


4. Apply the Grover operator. After j iterations,

(k , l ) (k j , l j )
Gj

N 2
2( N 1)
kj
k j 1
l j 1
k0 1
N
N
N
N 2
2
lj
l j 1 k j 1
l0 1
N
N
N
Need bound on the number of iterations

Unique Solution Case Recap (contd)


Let sin2 = 1

0< 2

1
lj
cos((2 j 1) )
N 1
1
~

=> m
4 2

k j sin(( 2 j 1) )

For km = 1,

(2m+1) = /2

For large N, sin =

1
N

m N
4

Multiple Solutions: Multiplicity known


Given F:{0,1}n {0,1}, find all i{0,1}n F(i)=1
M = number of solutions > 1

Define good states A = {i | F(i) = 1}|A| = M


bad states B = {j | F(j) = 0 }

|B| = N - M

Suffices to tackle good and bad states as groups


k = probability amplitude of each solution (element of set A)
l = probability amplitude of each element of set B
Mk2 + (N-M)l2 = 1

Multiple Solutions: Multiplicity known


Grovers algorithm for the multiple solution case

Structurally the same as that in the case of unique solution

1. Set up initial state |0 n


2. Apply the Hadamard transform
3. Apply Grover operator repeatedly

Apply the oracle

Apply Hn

Conditional phase shift

Apply Hn

Differs in the oracle implementation: Oracle lends a


relative phase shift of 1 to all solutions

Multiple Solutions: Multiplicity known


Define

(k , l ) k i l i
i A

iB

After j iterations:

(k , l ) (k j , l j )
Gj

1
kj
sin((2 j 1) )
M
sin 2 M

lj
2

1
cos((2 j 1) )
N M

Multiple Solutions: Multiplicity known


Let m = upper bound on number of iterations
We want lm = 0
cos ((2m+1)) = 2


m
4

~
mm

=>
1

1
~
m

4 2

| cos(2m+1) | | sin |
Probability of failure after exactly m iterations
(N-M) lm2 = cos2((2m+1)) sin2 = M N
Negligible for M << N

Multiple Solutions: Multiplicity known


For M << N, sin

4 4 sin 4

Knowing M, we can predetermine the upper bound on the


number of iterations, m.
Unique solution problem is a special case of this for M=1.

Multiple Solutions: unknown Multiplicity


Number of iterations required to obtain a solution with
significant confidence depends on the solutions multiplicity.

If M is not known, then there is no way of telling how many


iterations will suffice.

Take m =

N to be on the safe side? (max # iterations)

No! Probability of success minuscule when M = 4a2 where a


is a small integer.

Multiple Solutions: unknown Multiplicity


Modified procedure for unknown M:
1. Initialize m = 1 and = 8/7 (actually 1 < < 4/3)

2. Choose integer j such that 0 j m


3. Apply j iterations of Grovers algorithm
4. Measure and let outcome be i
5. If F(i) == 1 then solution found: exit program
6. Else m = min(m, N ): goto step #2

Theorem: This algorithm finds a solution in O( N / M )

Multiple Solutions: unknown Multiplicity


For M > 3N/4 constant expected time by classical sampling
For 0 < M 3N/4, runtime = O( N / M )
For M << N, runtime < 6 times runtime_if_M_were_known
Knowing the number of solutions helps in reducing runtime.
This motivates quantum counting

Quantum Counting
Aim: To determine the number of solutions M to an N item
unstructured search problem

Classical computing consults the oracle (N) times to


determine M
Quantum computing can combine Grovers algorithm and
phase estimation to determine M much faster!
Why count?
Fast estimation of M => rapid solution detection

Is there a solution at all? NP-Complete problems

Quantum Counting
Recall: The computational bases can be partitioned into two
subsets, the good states set A containing all the solutions, and

(k , l ) k i l i
i A

Letting

cos
we get

in the ,

iB

N M
,
N
cos 2
G
sin 2

basis.

N M
M

N
N

sin
sin 2
,

cos 2

M
,
N

Quantum Counting
Eigenvalues of G are ei2 and ei(2-2)
The value of can be determined by phase estimation
From , the value of M can be calculated

PHASE ESTIMATION
Given a unitary operator U and one of its eigenvectors, the
phase of its corresponding eigenvalue ei2 is determined

Quantum Counting
Complexity of phase estimation algorithms

Probability

Error in M

Runtime, P

of success

Absolute, max

Evaluations of F

2
2
MN 2 N
P
P
2
2
M 2
c
c

P4

8
8

c N
((c log log N ) N M )

You might also like